journal article·2025-02-01Open access

Numerical study of the effect of stenosis on the hemodynamics of a popliteal artery

Liuliu Shi, Xinru Xiang, Jinlong Liu, Wei Zhu

AIP Advances· Volume 15· Issue 2

Abstract

The investigation of flow characteristics within the popliteal artery is fundamental to understanding the progression of lower limb arterial disease, given its high susceptibility to atherosclerosis and its frequent manifestation of stenosis. Research on the hemodynamics associated with popliteal artery stenosis remains limited, particularly in cardiovascular diseases. This study comprehensively examines how Newtonian and non-Newtonian fluid models influence the hemodynamic simulations of popliteal artery stenosis. Key hemodynamic parameters, such as velocity, time-averaged wall shear stress (TAWSS), oscillatory shear index (OSI), and relative residence time (RRT), were systematically examined through numerical simulations to assess their influence and variability in arteries exhibiting different degrees of stenosis compared to healthy arteries. The findings indicate that both models’ velocity and wall shear stress (WSS) distributions are largely comparable during the systolic phase (0.04–0.07 s), characterized by elevated velocities. However, during the countercurrent diastolic phase (0.21–0.40 s), the viscosity of the non-Newtonian fluid model experiences an increase, leading to reduced velocity distributions relative to the Newtonian fluid model. In particular, a 12% disparity in velocities is observed between the two models, indicating that the non-Newtonian model is better suited for comprehensive hemodynamic analysis in simulations involving stenotic popliteal arteries. Furthermore, a distinct flow separation occurs at the stenosis site, with blood flow velocity and WSS exhibiting significant increases as the stenosis severity escalates. For instances where hemodynamic parameters demonstrate minimal variations at stenosis levels below 60%, OSI and RRT are elevated. In contrast, TAWSS remains low, potentially fostering plaque formation. In contrast, when hemodynamic parameters undergo substantial changes at stenosis levels exceeding 60%, TAWSS rises, which may facilitate plaque rupture. This simulation provides a comprehensive analysis of hemodynamic parameter variations across different degrees of stenosis, offering clinicians a valuable instrument for enhancing their understanding of the pathogenic mechanisms associated with popliteal artery atherosclerosis and stenosis.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Peripheral Artery Disease Management · Vascular Procedures and Complications · Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

School of Energy and Power Engineering, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology 1 , Shanghai 200093,

Shanghai Key Laboratory of Multiphase Flow and Heat Transfer in Power Engineering 2 , Shanghai 200093,

Institute of Pediatric Translational Medicine, Shanghai Children’s Medical Center, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University 3 , Shanghai 200127,

Shanghai Engineering Research Center of Virtual Reality of Structural Heart Disease, Shanghai Children’s Medical Center, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University 4 , Shanghai 200127,

Shanghai Institute for Pediatric Congenital Heart Disease, Shanghai Children’s Medical Center, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University 5 , Shanghai 200127,

Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine 6 , Guangzhou 510006,

The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine 7 , Guangzhou 510405,

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China

References (35)

Show source-provided references
1. Lancet · 2013 · 382 · 132910.1016/s0140-6736(13)61249-0 ↗
2. Am. J. Epidemiol. · 1992 · 135 · 33110.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a116294 ↗
3. Angiol. J. Vasc. Surg. · 2007 · 13 · 95
4. Bull. Math. Biol. · 2014 · 76 · 111710.1007/s11538-014-9948-4 ↗
5. Arterioscler. Thromb.: J. Vasc. Biol. · 1993 · 13 · 31010.1161/01.atv.13.2.310 ↗
6. Circulation · 2006 · 113 · 274410.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.590018 ↗
7. J. Biomed. Eng. Med. Devices · 2017 · 2 · 13010.4172/2475-7586.1000130 ↗
8. Curr. Gene Ther. · 2024 · 24 · 2910.2174/1566523223666230330091241 ↗
9. J. Biomech. Eng. · 2012 · 134 · 05100110.1115/1.4006681 ↗
10. J. Therm. Biol. · 2020 · 91 · 10262210.1016/j.jtherbio.2020.102622 ↗
11. Comput. Methods Programs Biomed. · 2020 · 195 · 10555610.1016/j.cmpb.2020.105556 ↗
12. Appl. Bionics Biomech. · 2023 · 143483210.1155/2023/1434832 ↗
13. Comput. Math. Appl. · 2010 · 60 · 57210.1016/j.camwa.2010.05.004 ↗
14. Clin. Neurol. Neurosurg. · 2024 · 237 · 10815310.1016/j.clineuro.2024.108153 ↗
15. J. Biomech. · 2016 · 49 · 241310.1016/j.jbiomech.2016.02.010 ↗
16. Adv. Med. Sci. · 2016 · 61 · 3210.1016/j.advms.2015.07.009 ↗
17. J. Vasc. Surg. · 2018 · 67 · 88710.1016/j.jvs.2017.08.094 ↗
18. Biomech. Model. Mechanobiol. · 2018 · 17 · 18110.1007/s10237-017-0953-z ↗
19. Biomech. Model. Mechanobiol. · 2019 · 18 · 188310.1007/s10237-019-01183-9 ↗
20. Biomech. Model. Mechanobiol. · 2019 · 18 · 88310.1007/s10237-019-01118-4 ↗
21. Sci. Rep. · 2016 · 6 · 3922510.1038/srep39225 ↗
22. Comput. Methods Biomech. Biomed. Eng. · 2016 · 19 · 114310.1080/10255842.2015.1113406 ↗
23. Comput. Methods Programs Biomed. · 2021 · 208 · 10625310.1016/j.cmpb.2021.106253 ↗
24. J. Biomech. · 2006 · 39 · 145410.1016/j.jbiomech.2005.04.005 ↗
25. PLoS One · 2013 · 8 · e5814710.1371/journal.pone.0058147 ↗
26. Med. Eng. Phys. · 2020 · 81 · 10510.1016/j.medengphy.2020.05.004 ↗
27. Rheol. Acta · 1978 · 17 · 64310.1007/bf01522037 ↗
28. Bioengineering · 2023 · 10 · 94410.3390/bioengineering10080944 ↗
29. Comput. Methods Biomech. Biomed. Eng. · 2015 · 18 · 150010.1080/10255842.2014.921682 ↗
30. J. Mech. Med. Biol. · 2018 · 18 · 185004310.1142/s0219519418500434 ↗
31. Cardiovasc. Pathol. · 2013 · 22 · 910.1016/j.carpath.2012.06.006 ↗
32. J. Surg. Res. · 2007 · 142 · 20210.1016/j.jss.2006.11.001 ↗
33. Int. J. Numer. Methods Biomed. Eng. · 2019 · 35 · e320710.1002/cnm.3207 ↗
34. J. Appl. Physiol. · 2006 · 101 · 141210.1152/japplphysiol.00051.2006 ↗
35. Atherosclerosis · 2011 · 214 · 24910.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2010.09.008 ↗