journal article·2024-04-01Open access

Broadband spin-filtered minimalistic magnetic tunnel junction

Sabarna Chakraborti, Korra Vamshi Krishna, Virendra Singh, Abhishek Sharma

AIP Advances· Volume 14· Issue 4

Abstract

The tri-layer magnetic tunnel junction (MTJ) has surfaced as a building block for engineering next-generation integrated circuits while combining the attributes of non-volatility and meager energy consumption. Nevertheless, the perceptible switching energy (≈20–50 fJ/bit) and sub-optimal tunnelmagnetoresistance (TMR) (≈200%–300%) have acted as major hindrances, concealing its potential to supersede the capabilities of static and dynamic random access memories. In this work, we introduce a novel device that features a minimalistic non-uniform heterostructure/superlattice instead of the oxide layer in a conventional MTJ and analyze it in the premise of the self-consistent coupling of the Non-Equilibrium-Green’s Function (NEGF) and the Landau-Liftshitz-Gilbert-Slonczewski (LLGS) equation. We ascertain that the coupling of the electrodes to the proposed heterostructure renders a highly spin-selective broadband transmittance, thereby enabling a towering TMR (%) of 3.7 × 104% along with a significant reduction in the spin transfer torque (STT) switching energy (≈1.96 fJ). Furthermore, the sizable slonczewski term (Is‖) originating from the heterostructure facilitates a swift STT-switching within the scale of a few hundred picoseconds (≈400 ps).
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Magnetic properties of thin films · Advanced Memory and Neural Computing · Ferroelectric and Negative Capacitance Devices

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Electrical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Ropar , Rupnagar, Punjab 140001, India

Funding

Science and Engineering Research Board

References (25)

Show source-provided references
1. J. Appl. Phys. · 2021 · 129 · 23390110.1063/5.0052693 ↗
2. Sens. Actuators, A · 2006 · 129 · 8610.1016/j.sna.2005.11.023 ↗
3. Phys. Rev. Appl. · 2017 · 8 · 06401410.1103/physrevapplied.8.064014 ↗
4. Proc. IEEE · 2016 · 104 · 191910.1109/jproc.2016.2554518 ↗
5. Sensors · 2021 · 21 · 66810.3390/s21020668 ↗
6. Sci. Rep. · 2022 · 12 · 338010.1038/s41598-022-07277-2 ↗
7. 2016 · 21
8. 2021 · 1
9. 2016 · 1010
10. IEEE Electron Device Lett. · 2019 · 40 · 56210.1109/led.2019.2902334 ↗
11. Nanoscale · 2021 · 13 · 86210.1039/d0nr07290g ↗
12. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces · 2018 · 11 · 360910.1021/acsami.8b20202 ↗
13. Nanotechnology · 2023 · 34 · 18520610.1088/1361-6528/acb69b ↗
14. 1997
15. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. · 1996 · 159 · L110.1016/0304-8853(96)00062-5 ↗
16. Philos. Trans. R. Soc., A · 2011 · 369 · 361710.1098/rsta.2011.0169 ↗
17. Vacuum · 2017 · 146 · 32910.1016/j.vacuum.2017.01.031 ↗
18. J. Alloys Compd. · 2017 · 726 · 69310.1016/j.jallcom.2017.07.184 ↗
19. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2018 · 112 · 19240410.1063/1.5023159 ↗
20. IEEE Trans. Nanotechnol. · 2012 · 11 · 26110.1109/tnano.2011.2163147 ↗
21. Nano Lett. · 2019 · 19 · 301910.1021/acs.nanolett.9b00205 ↗
22. Nat. Phys. · 2008 · 4 · 80310.1038/nphys1036 ↗
23. Nat. Mater. · 2010 · 9 · 72110.1038/nmat2804 ↗
24. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2014 · 105 · 06240310.1063/1.4892924 ↗
25. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2012 · 100 · 13240810.1063/1.3694270 ↗