journal article·2022-06-01Open access

The detection of buried nanopillar based on electrostatic force microscopy simulation

Yongzhen Luo, Guocong Lin, Xidong Ding, Tao Su

AIP Advances· Volume 12· Issue 6

Abstract

Based on electrostatic force microscopy (EFM), the image of nano-objects buried below the surface was numerically simulated by using COMSOL Multiphysics® software. The shape and the approximate size of the buried pillar could be obtained from the simulated EFM images. It was demonstrated that the detection of the buried nanopillar based on EFM was feasible. When the image data measured by EFM were used as the input data for comparison with the simulated data, the three unknowns (relative dielectric constant εr,p, buried depth d, and side length l) of the buried pillar could be obtained. In this paper, the simulated EFM image data were used as the input data. The accurate values of εr,p, d, and l of the buried nanopillar could be obtained by comparing the input data with the data simulated with other known parameters. The results showed that EFM was a good candidate as a kind of three dimensional nanoscale tomographic technique. It could map the physical properties of buried nanomaterials, which are relevant to modern integrated circuits.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Force Microscopy Techniques and Applications · Integrated Circuits and Semiconductor Failure Analysis · Near-Field Optical Microscopy

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

School of Electronics and Information Technology, Sun Yat-Sen University 1 , Guangzhou 510275, Guangdong, People’s Republic of China

School of Physics, Sun Yat-Sen University 2 , Guangzhou 510275, Guangdong, People’s Republic of China

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China

References (21)

Show source-provided references
1. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter · 2017 · 29 · 17300110.1088/1361-648x/aa5b4a ↗
2. J. Appl. Phys. · 2020 · 127 · 02430110.1063/1.5122984 ↗
3. Mater. Today · 2007 · 10 · 1810.1016/s1369-7021(07)70304-8 ↗
4. Mater. Today · 2007 · 10 · 2610.1016/s1369-7021(07)70305-x ↗
5. Nat. Mater. · 2009 · 8 · 27110.1038/nmat2406 ↗
6. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2000 · 85 · 274910.1103/physrevlett.85.2749 ↗
7. ACS Nano · 2010 · 4 · 560910.1021/nn1010683 ↗
8. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2007 · 90 · 18310810.1063/1.2734920 ↗
9. Langmuir · 2000 · 16 · 523110.1021/la0002334 ↗
10. J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2001 · 123 · 841210.1021/ja016353v ↗
11. Nanotechnology · 2010 · 21 · 22570210.1088/0957-4484/21/22/225702 ↗
12. Nanotechnology · 2013 · 24 · 13570110.1088/0957-4484/24/13/135701 ↗
13. Nanotechnology · 2016 · 27 · 41570510.1088/0957-4484/27/41/415705 ↗
14. Science · 2018 · 360 · 133910.1126/science.aat4191 ↗
15. Nanoscale · 2021 · 13 · 1011610.1039/d1nr01058a ↗
16. AIP Adv. · 2019 · 9 · 12521210.1063/1.5133095 ↗
17. AIP Adv. · 2020 · 10 · 11511810.1063/5.0028132 ↗
18. COMSOL, Inc., The COMSOL® Software Product Suite, https://www.comsol.com/products.
19. Nanotechnology · 2014 · 25 · 25570210.1088/0957-4484/25/25/255702 ↗
20. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2007 · 91 · 24311010.1063/1.2821119 ↗
21. Eur. Phys. J. B · 1998 · 2 · 510.1007/s100510050219 ↗