journal article·2021-12-01Open access

Particle induced visible light absorption enhancement on Al–Cu–Mg alloy fatigue fracture surfaces

Junfeng Zhao, Wencheng Song, Dandan Shi, Xianli Shi, Xiaoyan Dong, Wenwen Liu, Caiqiong Li, Xinxiang Yu, Han Dai

AIP Advances· Volume 11· Issue 12

Abstract

Particle induced visible light absorption enhancement on Al–Cu–Mg alloy fatigue fracture surfaces has been studied. By the calculations of three possible structures in optical dark areas (ODAs) in Al–Cu–Mg alloys, the light absorption abilities of Cu nanoparticles and Cu/Al2O3 particles are clearly revealed. Based on the calculations, the formation mechanism of ODA can be mainly attributed to the formation of Cu nanoparticles and Cu/Al2O3 particles, which lead to strong light absorption enhancement in the visible spectrum. In detail, Cu nanoparticles with larger radii exhibit higher light absorption. In addition, the formation of Cu/Al2O3 particles can further enhance the light absorption of Cu nanoparticles in ODA, which coincide well with the experimental results. The cathodic protection method is proved as an efficient way for avoiding the formation of ODA, and thus, the fatigue life of Al–Cu–Mg alloys is also greatly improved. This work should provide deeper insights into the formation mechanism of ODA in Al–Cu–Mg and other Cu contained Al alloys with high-cycle loadings.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Aluminum Alloy Microstructure Properties · Aluminum Alloys Composites Properties · Microstructure and mechanical properties

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Laboratory of Advanced Light Alloy Materials and Devices, Postdoctoral Workstation of Nanshan Group Co., Ltd., Yantai Nanshan University 1 , Longkou 265713, China

Hang Xin Material Technology Co., Ltd. 2 , Longkou 264006, China

Funding

China Postdoctoral Science Foundation

References (21)

Show source-provided references
1. Mater. Des. · 2014 · 56 · 86210.1016/j.matdes.2013.12.002 ↗
2. Mater. Sci. Eng., A · 2007 · 454–455 · 9910.1016/j.msea.2006.11.012 ↗
3. Int. J. Fatigue · 2006 · 28 · 152110.1016/j.ijfatigue.2005.08.015 ↗
4. Fatigue Fract. Eng. Mater. Struct. · 2000 · 23 · 89310.1046/j.1460-2695.2000.00328.x ↗
5. Fatigue Fract. Eng. Mater. Struct. · 2015 · 38 · 130510.1111/ffe.12344 ↗
6. J. Mater. Res. Technol. · 2021 · 11 · 21110.1016/j.jmrt.2021.01.014 ↗
7. Fatigue Fract. Eng. Mater. Struct. · 2020 · 43 · 237610.1111/ffe.13307 ↗
8. Sol. Energy · 2016 · 132 · 26710.1016/j.solener.2016.03.004 ↗
9. Electrochim. Acta · 2017 · 249 · 8910.1016/j.electacta.2017.07.187 ↗
10. J. Phys. Chem. B · 2005 · 109 · 2033110.1021/jp054385p ↗
11. Plasmonics · 2011 · 6 · 31110.1007/s11468-011-9206-7 ↗
12. J. Phys. Chem. B · 2006 · 110 · 1922010.1021/jp062536y ↗
13. Opt. Express · 2005 · 13 · 481810.1364/opex.13.004818 ↗
14. J. Nanomater. · 2021 · 665715310.1155/2021/6657153 ↗
15. Mater. Des. · 2014 · 59 · 1010.1016/j.matdes.2014.02.012 ↗
16. Int. J. Fatigue · 2001 · 23 · 23110.1016/s0142-1123(01)00167-0 ↗
17. Wear · 1964 · 7 · 14410.1016/0043-1648(64)90050-x ↗
18. J. Opt. Soc. Am · 1972 · 62 · 1405
19. Physica B · 2007 · 394 · 18410.1016/j.physb.2006.12.011 ↗
20. Ceram. Int. · 2016 · 42 · 117710.1016/j.ceramint.2015.09.048 ↗
21. J. Soc. Mater. Sci., Jpn. · 1975 · 24 · 114010.2472/jsms.24.1140 ↗