journal article·2024-09-01Open access

Does the full configuration interaction method based on quantum phase estimation with Trotter decomposition satisfy the size consistency condition?

Kenji Sugisaki

AIP Advances· Volume 14· Issue 9

Abstract

Electronic structure calculations of atoms and molecules are considered to be a promising application for quantum computers. Two key algorithms, the quantum phase estimation (QPE) and the variational quantum eigensolver (VQE), have been extensively studied. The condition that the energy of a dimer consisting of two monomers separated by a large distance should be equal to twice the energy of a monomer, known as size consistency, is essential in quantum chemical calculations. Recently, we reported that the size consistency condition can be violated by Trotterization in the unitary coupled cluster singles and doubles ansatz in the VQE when employing molecular orbitals delocalized to the dimer [Sugisaki et al., J. Comput. Chem. 45, 2204 (2024)]. It is well known that the full configuration interaction (full-CI) energy is invariant to arbitrary rotations of molecular orbitals, and therefore, the QPE-based full-CI should theoretically satisfy the size consistency. However, Trotterization of the time evolution operator can break the size consistency conditions. In this work, we investigated whether size consistency can be maintained with Trotterization of the time evolution operator in QPE-based full-CI calculations. Our numerical simulations revealed that size consistency in the QPE-based full-CI is not automatically violated by using molecular orbitals delocalized to the dimer, but employing an appropriate Trotter decomposition condition is crucial to maintain size consistency. We also report on the acceleration of QPE simulations through the sequential addition of ancillary qubits.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture · Quantum Information and Cryptography · Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Graduate School of Science and Technology, Keio University , 7-1 Shinkawasaki, Saiwai-ku, Kawasaki, Kanagawa 212-0032, Japan ; , 3-14-1 Hiyoshi, Kohoku-ku, Yokohama, Kanagawa 223-8522, Japan ; and , Sector V, Salt Lake, Kolkata 700091, India

Quantum Computing Center, Keio University , 7-1 Shinkawasaki, Saiwai-ku, Kawasaki, Kanagawa 212-0032, Japan ; , 3-14-1 Hiyoshi, Kohoku-ku, Yokohama, Kanagawa 223-8522, Japan ; and , Sector V, Salt Lake, Kolkata 700091, India

Centre for Quantum Engineering, Research and Education, TCG Centres for Research and Education in Science and Technology , 7-1 Shinkawasaki, Saiwai-ku, Kawasaki, Kanagawa 212-0032, Japan ; , 3-14-1 Hiyoshi, Kohoku-ku, Yokohama, Kanagawa 223-8522, Japan ; and , Sector V, Salt Lake, Kolkata 700091, India

Funding

Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology · Japan Science and Technology Agency · Japan Society for the Promotion of Science

References (51)

Show source-provided references
1. Simulated quantum computation of molecular energies10.1126/science.1113479 ↗
2. Quantum computing applied to calculations of molecular energies: CH2 benchmark10.1063/1.3503767 ↗
3. Elucidating reaction mechanisms on quantum computers10.1073/pnas.1619152114 ↗
4. Encoding electronic spectra in quantum circuits with linear T complexity10.1103/physrevx.8.041015 ↗
5. Even more efficient quantum computations of chemistry through tensor hypercontraction10.1103/prxquantum.2.030305 ↗
6. Toward quantum computing for high-energy excited states in molecular systems: Quantum phase estimations of core-level states10.1021/acs.jctc.0c00909 ↗
7. Fault-tolerant resource estimate for quantum chemical simulations: Case study on Li-ion battery electrolyte molecules10.1103/physrevresearch.4.023019 ↗
8. Quantum computing in pharma: A multilayer embedding approach for near future applications10.1002/jcc.26958 ↗
9. Optimized quantum phase estimation for simulating electronic states in various energy regimes10.1021/acs.jctc.2c00577 ↗
10. Iterative quantum phase estimation with variationally prepared reference state10.1002/qua.27021 ↗
11. TFermion: A non-Clifford gate cost assessment library of quantum phase estimation algorithms for quantum chemistry10.22331/q-2022-07-20-768 ↗
12. Y. Ino , M.Yonekawa, H.Yuzawa, Y.Minato, and K.Sugisaki, “Quantum phase estimations of benzene and its derivatives on GPGPU quantum simulators,” arXiv:2312.16375 (2023).
13. QREChem: Quantum resource estimation software for chemistry applications10.3389/frqst.2023.1232624 ↗
14. Dynamic linear response quantum algorithm10.1103/physrevc.100.034610 ↗
15. Bayesian phase difference estimation: A general quantum algorithm for the direct calculation of energy gaps10.1039/d1cp03156b ↗
16. Projective measurement-based quantum phase difference estimation algorithm for the direct computation of eigenenergy differences on a quantum computer10.1021/acs.jctc.3c00784 ↗
17. K. Kowalski , N. P.Bauman, G. H.Low, M.Roetteler, J. J.Rehr, and F. D.Vila, “Capturing many-body correlation effects with quantum and classical computing,” arXiv:2402.11418 (2024).
18. Entanglement-assisted phase estimation algorithm for calculating dynamical response functions10.1103/PhysRevA.110.022618 ↗
19. Towards quantum chemistry on a quantum computer10.1038/nchem.483 ↗
20. NMR implementation of a molecular hydrogen quantum simulation with adiabatic state preparation10.1103/physrevlett.104.030502 ↗
21. Scalable quantum simulation of molecular energies10.1103/physrevx.6.031007 ↗
22. Demonstrating Bayesian quantum phase estimation with quantum error detection10.1103/physrevresearch.6.013221 ↗
23. Quantum simulation of helium hydride cation in a solid-state spin register10.1021/acsnano.5b01651 ↗
24. Statistical phase estimation and error mitigation on a superconducting quantum processor10.1103/prxquantum.4.040341 ↗
25. A variational eigenvalue solver on a photonic quantum processor10.1038/ncomms5213 ↗
26. The variational quantum eigensolver: A review of methods and best practices10.1016/j.physrep.2022.08.003 ↗
27. A quantum computing view on unitary coupled cluster theory10.1039/d1cs00932j ↗
28. 1996
29. Size-consistency and orbital-invariance issues revealed by VQE-UCCSD calculations with the FMO scheme10.1002/jcc.27438 ↗
30. A. Y. Kitaev , “Quantum measurements and the Abelian stabilizer problem,” arXiv:quant-ph/9511026 (1995).
31. Quantum algorithm providing exponential speed increase for finding eigenvalues and eigenvectors10.1103/physrevlett.83.5162 ↗
32. Zur quantentheorie der molekeln10.1002/andp.19273892002 ↗
33. 2010
34. Über das paulische äquivalenzverbot10.1007/bf01331938 ↗
35. The Bravyi–Kitaev transformation for quantum computation of electronic structure10.1063/1.4768229 ↗
36. Simulating Hamiltonian dynamics with a truncated Taylor series10.1103/physrevlett.114.090502 ↗
37. A generalized circuit for the Hamiltonian dynamics through the truncated series10.1007/s11128-018-2099-z ↗
38. Hamiltonian simulation by qubitization10.22331/q-2019-07-12-163 ↗
39. Qubitization of arbitrary basis quantum chemistry leveraging sparsity and low rank factorization10.22331/q-2019-12-02-208 ↗
40. Application of Hilbert-space coupled-cluster theory to simple (H2)2 model systems: Planar models10.1103/physreva.47.2738 ↗
41. Recent developments in the general atomic and molecular electronic structure system10.1063/5.0005188 ↗
42. S. Bravyi , J. M.Gambetta, A.Mezzacapo, and K.Temme, “Tapering off qubits to simulate fermionic Hamiltonians,” arXiv:1701.08213 (2017).
43. A comparison of the Bravyi–Kitaev and Jordan–Wigner transformations for the quantum simulation of quantum chemistry10.1021/acs.jctc.8b00450 ↗
44. OpenFermion: The electronic structure package for quantum computers10.1088/2058-9565/ab8ebc ↗
45. 2022
46. cuQuantum SDK: A high-performance library for accelerating quantum science10.1109/QCE57702.2023.00119 ↗
47. SciPy 1.0: Fundamental algorithms for scientific computing in Python10.1038/s41592-019-0686-2 ↗
48. Dual-frequency quantum phase estimation mitigates the spectral leakage of quantum algorithms10.1109/lsp.2022.3170005 ↗
49. A density-matrix divide-and-conquer approach for electronic structure calculations of large molecules10.1063/1.470549 ↗
50. Density matrix embedding: A simple alternative to dynamical mean-field theory10.1103/physrevlett.109.186404 ↗
51. Fragment molecular orbital method: An approximate computational method for large molecules10.1016/s0009-2614(99)00874-x ↗