journal article·2023-05-01Open access

Low specific contact resistance between InAs/Ni–InAs evaluated by multi-sidewall TLM

Kei Sumita, Jun Takeyasu, Kasidit Toprasertpong, Mitsuru Takenaka, Shinichi Takagi

AIP Advances· Volume 13· Issue 5

Abstract

The specific contact resistance ρint of the InAs/Ni–InAs interface was evaluated by the multi-sidewall transmission line method (MSTLM), where Ni–InAs was formed by alloying Ni and InAs-on-insulator substrates. The revised test structure for MSTLM has been proposed, which can be easily fabricated. By evaluating each component of the parasitic resistance separately, the specific contact resistance of the InAs/Ni–InAs was accurately extracted. As a result, the record low ρint of (4.3 ± 2.5) × 10−9 Ω cm2 among metal/III-V contacts was obtained for the 30-nm-thick InAs/Ni–InAs interface with the average electron concentration of 9.1 × 1018 cm−3 for InAs, which is close to the Landauer limit. The comparison of the experimental and theoretical ρint indicates that there is no potential barrier at the InAs/Ni–InAs interface, which is attributable to the negative Schottky barrier height for electrons of InAs.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Semiconductor materials and devices · Semiconductor materials and interfaces · Integrated Circuits and Semiconductor Failure Analysis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Electrical Engineering and Information Systems, The University of Tokyo , 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan

Funding

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science London

References (32)

Show source-provided references
1. Nature · 2011 · 479 · 31710.1038/nature10677 ↗
2. Nat. Electron. · 2021 · 4 · 16210.1038/s41928-020-00531-3 ↗
3. 2018 · 899
4. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices · 2022 · 69 · 211510.1109/ted.2022.3143484 ↗
5. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices · 2008 · 55 · 2110.1109/ted.2007.911034 ↗
6. Kim, in IEDM Tech. Dig. (IEEE · 2022 · 8610.1109/IEDM45625.2022.10019363 ↗
7. Zota, in IEDM Tech. Dig. (IEEE · 2022 · 9010.1109/IEDM45625.2022.10019536 ↗
8. Kim, in IEDM Tech. Dig. (IEEE · 2022 · 25810.1109/IEDM45625.2022.10019567 ↗
9. Nat. Photonics · 2017 · 11 · 48610.1038/nphoton.2017.122 ↗
10. J. Appl. Phys. · 2020 · 127 · 03110110.1063/1.5128444 ↗
11. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. · 2019 · 25 · 820121010.1109/jstqe.2019.2904445 ↗
12. J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A · 2008 · 26 · 69710.1116/1.2905246 ↗
13. J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B: Microelectron. Nanometer Struct. Process., Meas., Phenom. · 2003 · 21 · 191510.1116/1.1588646 ↗
14. IEDM Tech. Dig. (IEEE · 2010 · 59610.1109/IEDM.2010.5703429 ↗
15. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices · 2013 · 60 · 334210.1109/ted.2013.2279363 ↗
16. IEEE Electron Device Lett. · 2012 · 33 · 50110.1109/led.2012.2185919 ↗
17. 2013 · 417
18. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. · 2020 · 59 · SGGA0810.35848/1347-4065/ab6cb3 ↗
19. Solid-State Electron. · 1972 · 15 · 14510.1016/0038-1101(72)90048-2 ↗
20. Solid-State Electron. · 1983 · 26 · 106510.1016/0038-1101(83)90003-5 ↗
21. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices · 1986 · 33 · 1910.1109/t-ed.1986.22430 ↗
22. IEEE Electron Device Lett. · 2013 · 34 · 108210.1109/led.2013.2271032 ↗
23. J. Appl. Phys. · 2013 · 114 · 15451610.1063/1.4826205 ↗
24. J. Appl. Phys. · 2020 · 128 · 01570510.1063/5.0007978 ↗
25. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2021 · 119 · 10350110.1063/5.0057182 ↗
26. J. Appl. Phys. · 1969 · 40 · 370210.1063/1.1658260 ↗
27. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. · 2019 · 58 · SBBA0310.7567/1347-4065/aafa68 ↗
28. IEEE Electron Device Lett. · 2014 · 35 · 44010.1109/led.2014.2305668 ↗
29. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices · 2021 · 68 · 200310.1109/ted.2021.3049455 ↗
30. J. Appl. Phys. · 2006 · 100 · 01411110.1063/1.2213170 ↗
31. IEEE J. Electron Devices Soc. · 2019 · 7 · 86910.1109/jeds.2019.2907957 ↗
32. 2014 · 776