Inferring interaction domains of collectively moving agents with varying radius of influence
Source abstract
Abstract
Transfer entropy (TE) has proven to be an effective tool for determining the causal connection between two processes. For example, TE has been used to classify leader and follower agents in collective dynamics in the Vicsek model (VM). However, previous results have limited interaction radii, which are precisely the same among all agents, which is not realistic in practice. Here, we propose a modified version of the VM where the domains in which an agent can be influenced by others vary from agent-to-agent, which matches more closely with a real-life setting where not all agents have the same physical traits. We demonstrate that the TE vs cut-off technique is robust and efficacious in determining the maximum distance at which two interacting agents can transfer information in the system. We find that for two agents with different interaction domains, the derivative of the average inward TE can determine the individual agent’s interaction domain. In a system with numerous agents, the TE vs cut-off technique is shown to be effective in predicting the average interaction domain of all agents, where the interaction domain of each agent was randomly selected from a Gaussian distribution.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Neural dynamics and brain function · Ecosystem dynamics and resilience · Opinion Dynamics and Social Influence
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Pabna University of Science and Technology 1 , Pabna 6600, Bangladesh
Research Center of Mathematics for Social Creativity, Research Institute for Electronic Science, Hokkaido University 2 , Kita 20, Nishi 10, Kita-ku, Sapporo 001-0020, Japan
Funding
Pabna University of Science and Technology
References (36)
Show source-provided references
1. Modes of information flow in collective cohesion10.1126/sciadv.abj1720 ↗
2. Hypoxia, partial EMT and collective migration: Emerging culprits in metastasis10.1016/j.tranon.2020.100845 ↗
3. An emerging tumor invasion mechanism about the collective cell migration
4. Directional collective migration in wound healing assays
5. Spatiotemporal dynamics of PIEZO1 localization controls keratinocyte migration during wound healing10.7554/eLife.65415 ↗
6. The ecology of collective behavior in ants10.1146/annurev-ento-011118-111923 ↗
7. Decoding collective communications using information theory tools10.1098/rsif.2019.0563 ↗
8. Quantifying interactions among car drivers using information theory10.1063/5.0023243 ↗
9. Extracting interactions between flying bat pairs using model-free methods10.3390/e21010042 ↗
10. What are leaders made of? The role of individual experience in determining leader–follower relations in homing pigeons10.1016/j.anbehav.2011.12.018 ↗
11. Experience and motivation shape leader–follower interactions in fish shoals10.1093/beheco/arw133 ↗
12. Leader-follower consensus and synchronization in numerosity-constrained networks with dynamic leadership10.1063/1.4967385 ↗
13. Social vigilance behaviour of the chacma baboon, Papio ursinus10.1163/156853960x00188 ↗
14. An improved elephant herding optimization for global optimization problems10.1007/s00366-021-01471-y ↗
15. The origins and evolution of leadership10.1016/j.cub.2009.07.027 ↗
16. Decoding leader cells in collective cancer invasion10.1038/s41568-021-00376-8 ↗
17. Rho-dependent formation of epithelial ‘leader’ cells during wound healing10.1073/pnas.1834401100 ↗
18. Leader cells regulate collective cell migration via Rac activation in the downstream signaling of integrin β1 and PI3K10.1038/srep07656 ↗
19. Quantitative cell polarity imaging defines leader-to-follower transitions during collective migration and the key role of microtubule-dependent adherens junction formation10.1242/dev.101675 ↗
20. Leaders in collective migration: Are front cells really endowed with a particular set of skills?10.12688/f1000research.11889.1 ↗
21. Model-free information-theoretic approach to infer leadership in pairs of zebrafish10.1103/PhysRevE.93.042411 ↗
22. Detecting undeclared-leader-follower structure in pedestrian evacuation using transfer entropy10.1109/tits.2022.3161813 ↗
23. Transfer entropy for synchronized behavior estimation of interpersonal relationships in human communication: Identifying leaders or followers10.1038/s41598-019-47525-6 ↗
24. Inferring domain of interactions among particles from ensemble of trajectories10.1103/PhysRevE.102.012404 ↗
25. Hierarchical group dynamics in pigeon flocks10.1038/nature08891 ↗
26. Novel type of phase transition in a system of self-driven particles10.1103/physrevlett.75.1226 ↗
27. Identifying interaction neighbours in animal groups10.1016/j.anbehav.2021.01.019 ↗
28. Transfer entropy dependent on distance among agents in quantifying leader-follower relationships10.2142/biophysico.bppb-v18.015 ↗
29. An information-theoretic approach to infer the underlying interaction domain among elements from finite length trajectories in a noisy environment10.1063/5.0034467 ↗
30. An autoregulatory circuit for long-range self-organization in Dictyostelium cell populations10.1038/nature03228 ↗
31. Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross-spectral methods10.2307/1912791 ↗
32. Analysis of pairwise interactions in a maximum likelihood sense to identify leaders in a group10.3389/frobt.2017.00035 ↗
33. Causal inference in nonlinear systems: Granger causality versus time-delayed mutual information10.1103/PhysRevE.97.052216 ↗
34. Transfer entropy10.1007/978-3-319-43222-9_4 ↗
35. Measuring information transfer10.1103/physrevlett.85.461 ↗
36. Information flow in finite flocks10.1038/s41598-020-59080-6 ↗