Study on the detonation reliability of explosive trains with a micro-sized air gap
Source abstract
Abstract
Air gap thickness significantly affects the detonation reliability of explosive trains. This paper mainly studies the detonation reliability of explosive trains with a micro-sized air gap. First, the detonation process of the JO-9C mild detonation cord initiating the 1.7 g/cm3 JO-11C booster is simulated by the AUTODYN software, and the critical air gap thickness is obtained between 0.32 and 0.40 mm. Second, a test device for explosive trains with adjustable air gap thickness is designed based on the numerical simulation results, and the adjustable step length of the air gap thickness is 0.0625 mm. Finally, a small sample evaluation method that does not depend on the standard deviation of the sensitivity distribution is proposed, and only 86 test samples are needed to verify the detonation reliability of 0.9999 at 0.1 mm air gap thickness. The test device designed and the small sample evaluation method proposed can be referred to for the detonation reliability evaluation of explosive trains with a micro-sized air gap.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Combustion and Detonation Processes · Risk and Safety Analysis · Energetic Materials and Combustion
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
State Key Laboratory of Explosion Science and Technology, Beijing Institute of Technology , Beijing 100081, China
References (33)
Show source-provided references
1. Air gaps, size effect, and corner-turning in ambient LX-1710.1002/prep.200700232 ↗
2. Varicomp, a method for determining detonation transfer probabilities
3. The VariDrive technique: A case study10.1002/(sici)1521-4087(200004)25:2<99::aid-prep99>3.0.co;2-2 ↗
4. On the shock sensitivity of explosive compounds with small-scale gap test10.1021/jp204814f ↗
5. Evaluation of the energy fluence in the small scale gap test10.1002/prep.201000007 ↗
6. Numerical simulation study of composite solid propellant small scale gap test10.1063/5.0039853 ↗
7. Critical energy for shock initiation of heterogeneous explosives
8. M. L. Schimmel, “Quantitative understanding of explosive stimulus transfer,” in Technical Report NASA CR-2341 (1973).
9. Study of explosive propagation across air gaps
10. Stress/strength models to estimate systems reliability R(t) = P(x < y)
11. A reliability demonstration test plan derivation method based on subsystem test data10.1016/j.cie.2022.108325 ↗
12. Optimal binomial reliability demonstration tests design under acceptance decision uncertainty10.1080/08982112.2020.1757703 ↗
13. The up-and-down method for small samples10.1080/01621459.1965.10480843 ↗
14. H. J. Langlie, “A reliability test method for one-shot items,” in Technical Report U-1792, Third edition (Aeronutronic Division of Ford Motor Company, CA, 1962), pp. 146–165.
15. Assessment of current methodologies to establish detonation transfer margins
16. Three-phase optimal design of sensitivity experiments10.1016/j.jspi.2013.10.007 ↗
17. Numerical analysis of the blast wave propagation due to various explosive charges10.1155/2020/8871412 ↗
18. Research on the influence of charge diameter upon the output pressure of small-sized explosives
19. Confinement effect and diameter effect on the non-ideal detonation parameters of small charge
20. Diameter effect on the propagation of curved detonation waves in micro-channel charges within a strong confinement10.1002/prep.201800052 ↗
21. Simulation analysis of influencing factors of flyer driven by small-size JO-9C booster explosive10.3969/j.issn.1000-1093.2020.02.005 ↗
22. Detonation wave propagation in micro-scale groove charges10.1063/1.5120085 ↗
23. Numerical simulation and experiment study of the energy transfer in micro-channel charge with air interlayer
24. Determination of Lee-Tarver model parameters of JO-11C explosive10.1002/prep.201800038 ↗
25. 2016
26. ANSYS · 2013
27. Multiphase improved Steinberg–Guinan model for vanadium10.1063/1.3013429 ↗
28. A Steinberg-Guinan model for high-pressure carbon: Diamond phase10.1063/1.2833022 ↗
29. Erosion criteria for frictional materials under blast load
30. Finite element analysis of spherical fragments penetrating LY-12 aluminum alloy target
31. Shock compression and initiation of LX-1010.1002/prep.19930180302 ↗
32. A small sample assessment method for firing reliability of explosive initiator based on the mean of sensitivity distribution
33. Chi-square goodness of fit test for bivariate distributions in polygonal area