A numerical study of the natural transition in a gas–liquid two-phase boundary layer over a flat plate taking account of interphase slip
Source abstract
Abstract
The natural transition in a gas–liquid two-phase boundary layer over an underwater flat plate is studied, taking into account the interphase slip between gas and liquid. An interphase slip model is proposed to determine the dynamic viscosity of the two-phase flow based on the physical origins of fluid viscosity. The model is then applied to laminar flow calculation, instability analysis, transition prediction, and prediction of the spectrum of wall fluctuating pressure in the laminar region. Numerical calculations are conducted for boundary layers for different void fractions, including liquid single-phase flow at a zero void fraction. The results reveal the differences between two-phase and single-phase flows and show that these differences become more obvious as the void fraction increases: (i) the thickness of the two-phase laminar boundary layer becomes less; (ii) the unstable zone becomes larger; (iii) the transition location moves upstream, and the transition advance distance caused by the microbubbles becomes longer and is proportional to the void fraction; (iv) the dangerous frequency becomes higher, and the frequency bandwidth becomes wider; and (v) the wall fluctuating pressure in the laminar region becomes stronger, and its peak frequency becomes slightly higher. As the oncoming flow velocity increases, the transition advance coefficient becomes smaller, and the dangerous frequency becomes higher. The comparison of the results of the interphase slip model and those of the conventional homogeneous flow model implies that the above differences between two-phase and single-phase flows are caused by the interphase slip between gas and liquid.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Fluid Dynamics and Heat Transfer · Fluid Dynamics and Mixing · Particle Dynamics in Fluid Flows
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (47)
Show source-provided references
1. Transition prediction in industrial applications10.1007/978-94-011-4515-2 ↗
2. FLAIR: Flux line-segment model for advection and interface reconstruction10.1016/0021-9991(91)90194-p ↗
3. Numerical prediction of two-phase flow in bubble columns10.1002/(sici)1097-0363(19961230)23:12<1289::aid-fld473>3.0.co;2-q ↗
4. Friction drag reduction of external flows with bubble and gas injection10.1146/annurev-fluid-121108-145504 ↗
5. Bubble-induced skin-friction drag reduction and the abrupt transition to air-layer drag reduction10.1017/s0022112008003029 ↗
6. Volume of fluid method for the dynamics of free boundaries10.1016/0021-9991(81)90145-5 ↗
7. Numerical investigation of flow structure and air entrainment of breaking bow wave generated by a rectangular plate10.1063/5.0077348 ↗
8. Drag reduction by microbubbles in a turbulent boundary layer10.1063/1.3492463 ↗
9. The measurement of bubble size distribution in the lab10.3404/j.issn.1672-7649.2008.02.014 ↗
10. Development of microbubble generation method10.1007/978-4-431-54067-0_34 ↗
11. Full-scale two-phase flow measurements on Athena research vessel10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2010.05.002 ↗
12. Scale-wise analysis of upward turbulent bubbly flows: An experimental study10.1063/5.0048199 ↗
13. Multiscale modeling of tip-leakage cavitating flows by a combined volume of fluid and discrete bubble model10.1063/5.0054795 ↗
14. A numerical study on the natural transition locations in the flat-plate boundary layers on superhydrophobic surfaces10.1063/5.0030713 ↗
15. Numerical investigation of the natural transition in flat-plate boundary layers on superhydrophobic surfaces considering the influence of the leading edge region10.1063/5.0087752 ↗
16. Numerical investigation of natural transitions of bow boundary layers over underwater axisymmetric bodies10.1063/5.0052072 ↗
17. Morphological bubble evolution induced by air diffusion on submerged hydrophobic structures10.1063/1.4977052 ↗
18. Reduction of turbulent skin friction by microbubbles10.1063/1.864620 ↗
19. Flow induced structural noise on a sonar dome of a ship
20. Drag reduction of a submersible hull by electrolysis10.1111/j.1559-3584.1973.tb04788.x ↗
21. Microbubble drag reduction in liquid turbulent boundary layers10.1115/1.3119751 ↗
22. Application of the exact regularized point particle method (ERPP) to bubble laden turbulent shear flows in the two-way coupling regime10.1063/5.0024004 ↗
23. Frictional drag reduction by bubble injection10.1007/s00348-014-1773-x ↗
24. Experimental investigation of bubbly flow by air injection on an inclined hydrofoil10.1063/5.0043221 ↗
25. SLIC (simple line interface calculation)
26. Bubble characteristics and trajectories in a microbubble boundary layer10.1063/1.866810 ↗
27. Wall pressure fluctuation spectra due to boundary-layer transition10.1016/j.jsv.2008.06.030 ↗
28. Bubble–wall interaction and two-phase flow parameters on a full-scale boat boundary layer10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2015.03.013 ↗
29. Stream-wise distribution of skin-friction drag reduction on a flat plate with bubble injection10.1063/1.4977800 ↗
30. 2009 · 221
31. Bubble friction drag reduction in a high-Reynolds-number flat-plate turbulent boundary layer10.1017/s0022112006008688 ↗
32. 2001 · 55
33. Influence of bubble size on micro-bubble drag reduction10.1007/s00348-006-0169-y ↗
34. Smith, A. and Gamberoni, N., “Transition, pressure gradient and stability theory,” Report No. ES 26388, Douglas Aircraft Company, CA, 1956.
35. The characteristics and mechanism of microbubble drag reduction on the axisymmetric body10.1142/s0217984918502068 ↗
36. A Level set approach for computing solutions to incompressible two-phase flow10.1006/jcph.1994.1155 ↗
37. Uniform flow injection into a turbulent boundary layer for trailing edge noise reduction10.1063/5.0013461 ↗
38. A method for capturing sharp fluid interfaces on arbitrary meshes10.1006/jcph.1999.6276 ↗
39. Van Ingen, J., “A suggested semi-empirical method for the calculation of boundary layer transition region,” Report No. VTH-74, Department of Aeronautical Engineering, University of Technology, Delft, 1956.
40. Euler–Lagrange study of cavitating turbulent flow around a hydrofoil10.1063/5.0070312 ↗
41. Experimental and numerical investigation of ventilated cavitating flow with special emphasis on gas leakage behavior and re-entrant jet dynamics10.1016/j.oceaneng.2015.07.063 ↗
42. Numerical investigation on the gas entrainment of ventilated partial cavity based on a multiscale modelling approach10.1016/j.apor.2016.08.003 ↗
43. Research progress in sonar dome turbulent boundary layer wall fluctuating pressure10.19693/j.issn.1673-3185.01084 ↗
44. Micro-bubble drag reduction with triangle bow and stern configuration using porous media on self propelled barge model10.1088/1755-1315/105/1/012094 ↗
45. Zhang, N.-M., “Research on multiphase hydrodynamic and attitude of submarine launched vehicle with boundary layer ventilation,” Ph.D. thesis, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin, 2017 (in Chinese).
46. Euler–Lagrange study of bubble breakup and coalescence in a turbulent boundary layer for bubble drag reduction10.1063/5.0037962 ↗
47. 2004