Theoretical and experimental study on coupling characteristics of double-sided immersion cylindrical shells with arbitrary boundary
Source abstract
Abstract
Based on the wave propagation method and improved Fourier series, the coupled vibration model of double-sided immersion (DI) cylindrical shell under arbitrary boundary conditions is established, and its coupled vibration characteristics are solved. The coupling vibration characteristic experiment of a cylindrical shell under the DI condition is carried out for the first time. The calculated natural frequency and vibration acceleration are compared with the model experimental results, which not only verifies the reliability of the theoretical method but also proves the effectiveness of the experimental results. Finally, the coupled vibration characteristics of DI cylindrical shells with arbitrary boundary conditions are analyzed. The results show that the natural frequency and acceleration of underwater immersed cylindrical shells are consistent with those of liquid filling cylindrical shells. The natural frequency and peak acceleration of the single-sided submerged cylindrical shell are greater than that of the DI cylindrical shell. The spring stiffness at both ends of the DI cylindrical shell can be divided into three sections: free boundary, elastic boundary, and rigid boundary.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Vibration and Dynamic Analysis · Fluid Dynamics and Vibration Analysis · Composite Structure Analysis and Optimization
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Institute of Noise & Vibration, Naval University of Engineering 1 , Wuhan 430033, China
National Key Laboratory on Ship Vibration and Noise, Naval University of Engineering 2 , Wuhan 430033, China
3Yantai Research Institute of Harbin Engineering University, Yantai 264000, China
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China
References (17)
Show source-provided references
1. Electr. Mach. Control · 2014 · 18 · 10210.3969/j.issn.1007-449X.2014.06.017 ↗
2. J. Vib. Shock · 2021 · 40 · 8110.13465/j.cnki.jvs.2021.03.011 ↗
3. Shipbuild. China · 2017 · 58 · 10110.3969/j.issn.1000-4882.2017.01.012 ↗
4. Acta Acust. · 1999 · 4 · 39110.1088/0256-307X/16/12/001 ↗
5. J. Ship. Mech. · 2011 · 15 · 301
6. J. Vib. Shock · 2014 · 33 · 14210.13465/j.cnki.jvs.2014.21.024 ↗
7. Appl. Acoust. · 2019 · 149 · 14310.1016/j.apacoust.2019.01.009 ↗
8. Comput. Struct. · 1997 · 65 · 30710.1016/s0045-7949(96)00252-0 ↗
9. Ocean Eng. · 2016 · 127 · 22610.1016/j.oceaneng.2016.10.008 ↗
10. Int. J. Mech. Sci. · 2013 · 68 · 18010.1016/j.ijmecsci.2013.01.013 ↗
11. J. Sound Vib. · 2012 · 331 · 417010.1016/j.jsv.2012.04.018 ↗
12. Compos. Struct. · 2015 · 133 · 110110.1016/j.compstruct.2015.08.015 ↗
13. Compos. Struct. · 2013 · 106 · 11410.1016/j.compstruct.2013.06.002 ↗
14. J. Ship Mech. · 2017 · 21 · 88010.3969/j.issn.1007-7294.2017.07.010 ↗
15. Ocean Eng. · 2015 · 108 · 24110.1016/j.oceaneng.2015.07.065 ↗
16. 1973
17. Shipbuild. China · 2016 · 57 · 7210.3969/j.issn.1000-4882.2016.03.009 ↗