journal article·2022-02-01Open access

Sensitivity of SQUID-on-tip (SOT) to a magnetic nano-particle

Abul Hasnat Rubel

AIP Advances· Volume 12· Issue 2

Abstract

Within the state-of-the-art 3D Ginzburg–Landau (GL) formalism, we investigate the static features of the most sensitive SQUID-on-tip (SOT) device placed on the top of a nano-particle. The SOT sensor’s free energy, Cooper pair density, and screening current density in the loop are investigated for the nano-particle’s various placements and sizes. The dynamic aspects of the device, such as its voltage–current characteristics, are evaluated in the presence of transport current using the two-dimensional (2D) time-dependent GL formalism. The sensitivity of the SOT is examined using quantum oscillations of the device’s depairing current as a function of the nano-particle’s size and location. The location of the nano-particle at the device’s center and closer to the device’s loop is required for optimal SOT sensitivity.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Quantum and electron transport phenomena · Mechanical and Optical Resonators · Atomic and Subatomic Physics Research

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Physics, Jagannath University , Dhaka, Bangladesh

References (31)

Show source-provided references
1. Nature · 2004 · 430 · 32910.1038/nature02658 ↗
2. Nat. Phys. · 2011 · 7 · 68710.1038/nphys1999 ↗
3. Rev. Sci. Instrum. · 2016 · 87 · 09370210.1063/1.4961982 ↗
4. Rep. Prog. Phys. · 2010 · 73 · 12650110.1088/0034-4885/73/12/126501 ↗
5. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2008 · 93 · 24310110.1063/1.3046098 ↗
6. Nanotechnology · 2011 · 22 · 45550110.1088/0957-4484/22/45/455501 ↗
7. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2011 · 99 · 03250610.1063/1.3614437 ↗
8. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2011 · 98 · 02111010.1063/1.3540688 ↗
9. Phys. Rep. · 2016 · 614 · 110.1016/j.physrep.2015.12.001 ↗
10. Supercond. Sci. Technol. · 2019 · 32 · 07300110.1088/1361-6668/ab1814 ↗
11. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2015 · 106 · 25260110.1063/1.4922640 ↗
12. ACS Nano · 2016 · 10 · 830810.1021/acsnano.6b02218 ↗
13. J. Appl. Phys. · 2016 · 119 · 17450110.1063/1.4948477 ↗
14. Supercond. Sci. Technol. · 2016 · 30 · 02400310.1088/0953-2048/30/2/024003 ↗
15. Nano Lett. · 2019 · 19 · 190210.1021/acs.nanolett.8b04991 ↗
16. IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond. · 2019 · 29 · 110.1109/tasc.2019.2904479 ↗
17. Nano Lett. · 2010 · 10 · 104610.1021/nl100009r ↗
18. Nat. Nanotechnol · 2013 · 8 · 63910.1038/nnano.2013.169 ↗
19. Rev. Sci. Instrum. · 2012 · 83 · 07370210.1063/1.4731656 ↗
20. Supercond. Sci. Technol. · 2009 · 22 · 06400210.1088/0953-2048/22/6/064002 ↗
21. Supercond. Sci. Technol. · 2010 · 24 · 01501510.1088/0953-2048/24/1/015015 ↗
22. Phys. Rev. B · 1993 · 47 · 801610.1103/physrevb.47.8016 ↗
23. Phys. Rev. B · 1998 · 57 · 1381710.1103/physrevb.57.13817 ↗
24. 2004
25. Phys. Rev. B · 2009 · 80 · 21450910.1103/physrevb.80.214509 ↗
26. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1978 · 40 · 104110.1103/physrevlett.40.1041 ↗
27. J. Low Temp. Phys. · 1981 · 42 · 45910.1007/bf00117427 ↗
28. Phys. Rev. B · 2011 · 84 · 09452710.1103/physrevb.84.094527 ↗
29. Phys. Rev. B · 2011 · 84 · 17451010.1103/physrevb.84.174510 ↗
30. Physica C · 2020 · 575 · 135368610.1016/j.physc.2020.1353686 ↗
31. Physica C · 2021 · 583 · 135385210.1016/j.physc.2021.1353852 ↗