journal article·2021-02-01Open access

Experimental study on the structural stability of zeolite imidazolate framework-8 in the alkaline solution

Zixuan Huang, Hai Li, Bei Liu, Chongzhi Jia, Wan Chen, Lanying Yang, Guangjin Chen

AIP Advances· Volume 11· Issue 2

Abstract

In our previous work, we observed that the structure of zeolite imidazolate framework-8 (ZIF-8) decomposed in the presence of water during the CO2 capture process. However, the structure of ZIF-8 was perfectly retained after adding 5 wt. % or more 2-methylimidazole (HMeim) into the solution. In this work, we investigated the pore structural stability of ZIF-8 when it was suspended in five other alkaline solutions. The results show that the ZIF-8 suspended in monoethanolamine (MEA), methyldiethanolamine (MDEA), and HMeim can still maintain the topological structure whereas the ZIF-8 converted to ZIF-61 and Zn2(Bim)4, respectively, when it came into contact with imidazole (Him) and benzimidazole (HBim). In addition, MEA, MDEA, and HMeim solutions could protect the porous structure of ZIF-8 when ZIF-8 slurry was used for CO2 capture. Nevertheless, the structure of ZIF-8 also collapsed when the concentration of alkaline was lower than 10 wt. %.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Metal-Organic Frameworks: Synthesis and Applications · Covalent Organic Framework Applications · Membrane Separation and Gas Transport

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

State Key Laboratory of Heavy Oil Processing, China University of Petroleum 1 , Beijing 102249, China

Key Laboratory of Green Process and Engineering, Institute of Process Engineering, Chinese Academy of Sciences 2 , Beijing 100190, China

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China · Science Foundation of China University of Petroleum, Beijing

References (28)

Show source-provided references
1. Science · 2008 · 319 · 93910.1126/science.1152516 ↗
2. Chem. Rev. · 2012 · 112 · 86910.1021/cr200190s ↗
3. Energies · 2015 · 8 · 1153110.3390/en81011531 ↗
4. Chem. Soc. Rev. · 2008 · 37 · 19110.1039/b618320b ↗
5. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. · 2006 · 103 · 1018610.1073/pnas.0602439103 ↗
6. ACS Catal. · 2011 · 1 · 12010.1021/cs1000625 ↗
7. J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2010 · 132 · 783210.1021/ja101415b ↗
8. Nat. Commun. · 2014 · 5 · 514710.1038/ncomms6147 ↗
9. J. Membr. Sci. · 2011 · 369 · 28410.1016/j.memsci.2010.12.001 ↗
10. Energies · 2018 · 11 · 189010.3390/en11071890 ↗
11. Chem. Eng. Sci. · 2015 · 137 · 50410.1016/j.ces.2015.06.069 ↗
12. Chem. Rev. · 2007 · 107 · 407810.1021/cr0501792 ↗
13. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. · 2013 · 173 · 2910.1016/j.micromeso.2013.01.031 ↗
14. Dalton Trans. · 2012 · 41 · 545810.1039/c2dt30174a ↗
15. Chem. Commun. · 2011 · 47 · 207110.1039/c0cc05002d ↗
16. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. · 2014 · 184 · 5510.1016/j.micromeso.2013.10.003 ↗
17. Sci. Rep. · 2016 · 6 · 2111410.1038/srep21114 ↗
18. J. Phys. Chem. C · 2016 · 120 · 1328710.1021/acs.jpcc.6b03772 ↗
19. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. · 2017 · 5 · 946710.1021/acssuschemeng.7b02604 ↗
20. Chem. Mater. · 2016 · 28 · 696010.1021/acs.chemmater.6b02643 ↗
21. Chem. Eng. Sci. · 2018 · 182 · 18910.1016/j.ces.2018.02.022 ↗
22. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. · 2018 · 57 · 1249410.1021/acs.iecr.8b02170 ↗
23. Acc. Chem. Res. · 2010 · 43 · 5810.1021/ar900116g ↗
24. Science · 2014 · 346 · 135610.1126/science.1254227 ↗
25. Chem. Sci. · 2018 · 9 · 413210.1039/c7sc04815g ↗
26. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. · 2006 · 45 · 155710.1002/anie.200503778 ↗
27. Chem. Mater. · 2015 · 27 · 308810.1021/acs.chemmater.5b00614 ↗
28. J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 1999 · 121 · 766510.1021/ja984470t ↗