Precession coupled spin current in spin torque driven magnetic tunnel junctions
Source abstract
Abstract
A spin-torque switchable magnetic tunnel junction contains two ferromagnetic electrodes across a barrier that supports spin-polarized tunnel current. The spin-torque induced magnetic switching of its more agile, or “free” layer provides the “write” mechanism. Often the dynamics of the non-switching “reference” layer is also important. Here, we illustrate such dynamics involving both the free and the reference layers by using an exchange-coupled two-macrospin-moment numerical model, described by a set of Landau–Lifshitz–Gilbert (LLG) equations, together with a stochastic Langevin-field for finite temperature. Damping-like spin-transfer torque is included for both moments. In steady-state, the coupled precession is shown to reduce effective spin-current delivered to the free layer due to a precessional resonant spin-current back flow. This back-flow of spin current preferentially affects the parallel state dynamics. It is not directly related to the reference layer’s thermal stability, nor its spin-torque switching threshold, as determined by the total anisotropy energy and magnetic volume. Rather, the spin-current reduction relates primarily to the matching of precession frequency between the free- and the reference-layer. Therefore, a desirable materials choice is to avoid anisotropy fields giving the free and the reference layer similar dynamic frequencies, so as to prevent such resonance-related spin-current loss.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Magnetic properties of thin films · Quantum and electron transport phenomena · Theoretical and Computational Physics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
IBM T. J. Watson Research Center , Yorktown Heights, New York 10598, USA
References (26)
Show source-provided references
1. Phys. Rev. · 1948 · 73 · 15510.1103/physrev.73.155 ↗
2. Phys. Rev. B · 2017 · 96 · 06443710.1103/physrevb.96.064437 ↗
3. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2004 · 84 · 311810.1063/1.1707228 ↗
4. Phys. Rev. B · 1989 · 39 · 699510.1103/physrevb.39.6995 ↗
5. Nature Nanotechnology · 2015 · 10 · 18710.1038/nnano.2015.24 ↗
6. 2014
7. SPIE Conference · 2016 · 9931 · 37
8. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2002 · 89 · 10720610.1103/physrevlett.89.107206 ↗
9. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2006 · 89 · 11250310.1063/1.2349321 ↗
10. Phys. Rev. B · 2017 · 96 · 13441610.1103/physrevb.96.134416 ↗
11. Philos. Mag. Ser. · 1945 · 36 · 80310.1080/14786444508521510 ↗
12. Phys. Rev. · 1945 · 67 · 35110.1103/physrev.67.351 ↗
13. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. · 2005 · 38 · 333310.1088/0022-3727/38/18/001 ↗
14. J. Appl. Phys. · 1965 · 36 · 157910.1063/1.1703091 ↗
15. Phys. Rev. B · 2015 · 91 · 17442910.1103/PhysRevB.77.174429 ↗
16. Phys. Rev. · 1963 · 130 · 167710.1103/physrev.130.1677 ↗
17. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 1999 · 75 · 386210.1063/1.125481 ↗
18. J. Stat. Mech · 2014 · P0900810.1088/1742-5468/2014/09/p09008 ↗
19. Phys. Rev. B · 2005 · 71 · 02441110.1103/physrevb.71.024411 ↗
20. Phys. Rev. B · 2013 · 88 · 10440510.1103/physrevb.88.104405 ↗
21. IEEE Magn. Lett. · 2011 · 2 · 300030410.1109/lmag.2011.2159484 ↗
22. AIP Advances · 2016 · 6 · 07501710.1063/1.4959905 ↗
23. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2017 · 111 · 07240310.1063/1.4999312 ↗
24. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2016 · 109 · 13240810.1063/1.4963354 ↗
25. Phys. Rev. B · 2013 · 88 · 10442610.1103/physrevb.88.104426 ↗
26. Sci. Adv. · 2019 · 5 · eaav694310.1126/sciadv.aav6943 ↗