journal article·2017-05-01Open access

Self-biased microwave ferromagnetic performance of patterned Ni80Fe20 thin films

Ru Yang, Xiaomin Liu, Honglei Du, Nian X. Sun, Hwaider Lin, Shandong Li

AIP Advances· Volume 7· Issue 5

Abstract

Patterned Ni80Fe20 permalloy films with strip length of 5 mm, strip distance of 40μm and various ferromagnetic (FM) strip widths from 20 to 40μm were prepared by pulse laser deposition and photolithography for study the microwave performance of permalloy films. Comparing with the continuous magnetically isotropic permalloy film, the anisotropy fields HK increase with the decrease of the FM strips’ width. As a result, the ferromagnetic resonance frequency fr is enhanced from 1.71 GHz of continuous film to 2.1 GHz of patterned film with FM strip width of 20μm. The comparison between fr and HK demonstrates that the enhancement of fr can be attributed to the increase of HK due to the shape anisotropy of permalloy strips.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Magnetic properties of thin films · Magnetic Properties and Applications · Metallic Glasses and Amorphous Alloys

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Qingdao University 1 College of Physics, , Qingdao 266071, China

Shandong University 2 School of Physics, , Jian 250100, China

Northeastern University 3 Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, , Boston, MA 02115, USA

Nanjing University 4 National Laboratory of Solid State Microstructures, , Nanjing 210093, China

Funding

Key Project of Natrual Science Foundation of Shandong Province · National Natural Science Foundation of China

References (26)

Show source-provided references
1. Microw. Symp. Dig. · 1999 · 4 · 1897
2. Anal. Chem. · 2009 · 81 · 518810.1021/ac802681r ↗
3. J. Appl. Phys. · 1999 · 85 · 791910.1063/1.370608 ↗
4. IEEE Trans. Microw. Theo. Tech. · 2009 · 57 · 166910.1109/TMTT.2009.2022588 ↗
5. J. Appl. Phys. · 2015 · 117 · 7919
6. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. · 2006 · 304 · 20810.1016/j.jmmm.2006.02.143 ↗
7. Nanotech. · 2007 · 18 · 15570510.1088/0957-4484/18/15/155705 ↗
8. J. App. Phys. · 2013 · 113 · 20391610.1063/1.4807927 ↗
9. Eur. Ceram. Soc. · 2010 · 30 · 117110.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2009.06.025 ↗
10. IEEE Trans. Magn. · 1989 · 25 · 332410.1109/20.42291 ↗
11. J. App. Phys. · 2006 · 99 · 08F11410.1063/1.2169503 ↗
12. IEEE Trans. Magn. · 2005 · 41 · 325910.1109/TMAG.2005.854667 ↗
13. Sci. Rep. · 2015 · 5 · 1702310.1038/srep17023 ↗
14. J. Appl. Phys. · 1998 · 83 · 666110.1063/1.367704 ↗
15. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2008 · 92 · 09250110.1063/1.2889447 ↗
16. Adv. Funct. Mater. · 2016 · 26 · 373810.1002/adfm.201600122 ↗
17. J. Appl. Phys. · 2005 · 97 · 10F91010.1063/1.1855171 ↗
18. J. Alloy. & Compd. · 2010 · 506 · 50410.1016/j.jallcom.2010.07.064 ↗
19. Adv. Mater. · 2009 · 21 · 471110.1002/adma.200901131 ↗
20. Adv. Funct. Mater. · 2009 · 19 · 182610.1002/adfm.200801907 ↗
21. J. Appl. Phys. · 2010 · 108 · 09392710.1063/1.3506538 ↗
22. J. Appl. Phys. · 2009 · 106 · 12391210.1063/1.3272718 ↗
23. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2015 · 106 · 21240410.1063/1.4921784 ↗
24. J. Optoelectron. Adv. Mat. · 2008 · 10 · 978
25. Phys. Rev. · 1948 · 73 · 15510.1103/PhysRev.73.155 ↗
26. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. · 2013 · 46 · 843