journal article·2020-09-01Open access

Proton beam position measurement in air using a BPM

Prabir K. Roy, John W. Lewellen, Levi P. Neukirch, Heath A. Watkins

AIP Advances· Volume 10· Issue 9

Abstract

A Beam Position Monitor (BPM) is potentially useful to measure the position and phase of the beam in air in a non-destructive way. An air-gap BPM in experiments, such as beam-induced radioactive waste management and dynamic radiography applications, where a so-called air gap is needed, can be utilized to measure the beam position and phase. In this study, a stripline BPM was used in the air-gap of an 800 MeV proton beam transport line. The downstream end of the primary beamline exit window was made of a thin aluminum plate and allowed the beam to travel 1.2 m in ambient air before re-entering into a vacuum drift section. Such a configuration was arranged to examine the BPM effectiveness in atmospheric temperature and pressure where ionization of air occurs. In this study, a high energy (800 MeV), high current (0.6 A beam peak current/pulse) proton beam of 5 mm radius was transported in the air. The beam position relative to the axis was measured by detecting the signature of the beam in a nanosecond scale. This nanosecond scale detection ability was useful to identify other signals such as plasma effects. The BPM signals were processed at a frequency of 201 MHz; thus, one gets a stronger response in a stripline pattern as it was used in this study instead of a dot-type BPM. Experimental data show that the BPM works well in air, but ionization of air or plasma formation could not be measured over the BPM signal. The design, construction, and performance of a BPM in air environment are presented.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Particle accelerators and beam dynamics · Magnetic confinement fusion research · Radiation Detection and Scintillator Technologies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Los Alamos National Laboratory, LANSCE, Accelerator Operations and Technology Division (AOT) , Los Alamos, New Mexico 87545, USA

Funding

Los Alamos National Laboratory

References (30)

Show source-provided references
1. 2013
2. Nucl. Phys. A · 1999 · 654 · 417C10.1016/s0375-9474(99)00267-5 ↗
3. Nucl. Phys. A · 1999 · 654 · 436C10.1016/s0375-9474(99)00269-9 ↗
4. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. · 2003 · 36 · L7910.1088/0022-3727/36/18/l01 ↗
5. 2004 · 685
6. 2001 · 101
7. 1998 · 187
8. J. Chem. Eng. · 2013 · 219 · 37110.1016/j.cej.2012.12.069 ↗
9. Phys. Rev. Spec. Top.–Accel. Beams · 2011 · 14 · 12040110.1103/PhysRevSTAB.14.120401 ↗
10. Phys. Rev. Spec. Top.–Accel. Beams · 2014 · 17 · 03010110.1103/PhysRevSTAB.17.030101 ↗
11. IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. · 2017 · 45 · 296210.1109/tps.2017.2755861 ↗
12. AIP Conf. Proc. · 1990 · 212 · 2610.1063/1.39710 ↗
13. AIP Conf. Proc. · 1994 · 319 · 30310.1063/1.46975 ↗
14. AIP Conf. Proc. · 1997 · 390 · 5010.1063/1.52306 ↗
15. 2005 · 3616
16. 2008 · 187
17. 2009 · 89
18. 2011 · 1416
19. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A · 2016 · 837 · 3410.1016/j.nima.2016.08.042 ↗
20. 2003 · 138
21. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A · 2006 · 562 · 91010.1016/j.nima.2006.02.178 ↗
22. EM analysis of wide-lobe BPMs for the IPF
23. Phys. Procedia · 2017 · 90 · 37410.1016/j.phpro.2017.09.035 ↗
24. AIP Conf. Proc. · 1992 · 249 · 60110.1063/1.41980 ↗
25. Science · 2018 · 360 · 62710.1126/science.aan8895 ↗
26. Phys. Rev. C · 2018 · 97 · 03550510.1103/PhysRevC.97.035505 ↗
27. Phys. Rev. C · 2018 · 97 · 012501(R)10.1103/PhysRevC.97.012501 ↗
28. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2018 · 121 · 02250510.1103/PhysRevLett.121.241805 ↗
29. 22161