Electron emission from metal emitters subject to a high intensity laser in the presence of DC electric fields
Source abstract
Abstract
Electron emission driven by both a strong DC applied bias and a superimposed laser field is examined through numerical simulations. Heating at the electrode surface that creates a dynamic, nonequilibrium electron distribution is included based on appropriate rate-equation analyses for energy balance. Much higher emission currents are predicted that follow the AC oscillations over the femtosecond range. The hot carrier population are predicted to persist much longer to yield a more gradual decay in the emission current beyond laser termination. The numerical results are also extended to an emitter array, given the interest in such configurations for obtaining high output coherent currents. The capability can subsequently be extended to assess the coherence and emittance of the electron source based on Monte Carlo transport techniques.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Laser-induced spectroscopy and plasma · Semiconductor materials and devices · Ion-surface interactions and analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Texas Tech University , Lubbock, Texas 79409, USA
Funding
Office of Naval Research · Air Force Office of Scientific Research
References (25)
Show source-provided references
1. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2002 · 88 · 10480210.1103/PhysRevLett.88.104802 ↗
2. Nature (London) · 2005 · 438 · 47910.1038/nature04298 ↗
3. Science · 2003 · 302 · 138210.1126/science.1090052 ↗
4. Science · 2001 · 291 · 45810.1073/pnas.131192898 ↗
5. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. · 2005 · 102 · 706910.1073/pnas.0502607102 ↗
6. 2003
7. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2004 · 92 · 24610310.1103/physrevlett.92.246103 ↗
8. Phys. Rev. B · 2010 · 81 · 11542910.1103/physrevb.81.115429 ↗
9. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2006 · 97 · 24740210.1103/physrevlett.97.247402 ↗
10. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2010 · 105 · 14760110.1103/physrevlett.105.147601 ↗
11. Phys. Rev. B · 2013 · 88 · 19543410.1103/physrevb.88.195434 ↗
12. Scientific Reports · 2016 · 6 · 1989410.1038/srep19894 ↗
13. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1993 · 70 · 190010.1103/physrevlett.70.1900 ↗
14. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1996 · 76 · 401010.1103/physrevlett.76.4010 ↗
15. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1992 · 68 · 283410.1103/physrevlett.68.2834 ↗
16. AIP Advances · 2015 · 5 · 12723710.1063/1.4939569 ↗
17. Phys. Rev B · 1989 · 39 · 118010.1103/physrevb.39.1180 ↗
18. Phys. Rev. B · 1992 · 46 · 1359210.1103/physrevb.46.13592 ↗
19. Journ. Appl. Phys. · 2017 · 121 · 20330310.1063/1.4983680 ↗
20. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2015 · 106 · 20160310.1063/1.4921709 ↗
21. Vacuum · 2016 · 127 · 4510.1016/j.vacuum.2016.01.026 ↗
22. J. Appl. Phys. · 1996 · 79 · 3910.1063/1.360951 ↗
23. J. Appl. Phys. · 2016 · 120 · 12430710.1063/1.4963125 ↗
24. J. Appl. Phys. · 2003 · 93 · 483610.1063/1.1562734 ↗
25. Journal of Physics D · 2013 · 46 · 12530610.1088/0022-3727/46/12/125306 ↗