Magnetic-field tribological behaviors of aluminum-alloy and steel
Source abstract
Abstract
This paper used aluminum-alloy-2A02 (paramagnetic) and High-Speed-Steel (HSS) W18Cr4V (ferromagnetic) as the research objects to study the effect of DC magnetic-field on the dry tribology performance adopting the mutual matching methods (aluminum-alloy pin to HSS ring and HSS pin to aluminum-alloy to HSS ring, respectively). The wear rate of aluminum-alloy ring coupled with HSS pin was larger than that of pin coupled with HSS ring, which indicated that the influence of contacted surface size and hardness of friction pairs should be considered in the tribological research and application. The material of high magnetic permeability led to the wear rate decreases under a magnetic-field. The mechanism of sliding wear namely the ferromagnetic debris is adsorbed by HSS surface under the magnetic force. The wear rate is affected by the magnetic force depending on pin/disc material in a magnetic-field. The friction coefficient of aluminum-alloy pin/HSS ring is larger than that of HSS pin/aluminum-alloy ring, indicating the high difference of magnetic permeability for the coupled materials is disadvantageous to the antifriction effect of magnetic-field.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Electromagnetic Effects on Materials · Aluminum Alloys Composites Properties · Electrical Contact Performance and Analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Zhengzhou University of Aeronautics 1 , Zhenzhou 450046, China
Collaborative Innovation Center for Aviation Economic Development of Henan Province 2 , West Wenyuan Road, 450046 Zhenzhou, China
School of Material Science and Engineering, Anhui University of Technology 3 , Maanshan 243002, China
Funding
foundation for university cadre teacher of henan province · science and technology foundation of henan · National Natural Science Foundation of China
References (23)
Show source-provided references
1. Surf. Coat. Tech. · 2001 · 148 · 24110.1016/s0257-8972(01)01355-x ↗
2. Tribol. Int. · 2016 · 97 · 37110.1016/j.triboint.2016.02.001 ↗
3. Wear · 2015 · 328 · 42210.1016/j.wear.2015.02.062 ↗
4. Procedia Engineering · 2015 · 129 · 11110.1016/j.proeng.2015.12.017 ↗
5. J. Mech. Eng. · 2010 · 46 · 8310.3901/jme.2010.24.083 ↗
6. Wear · 2007 · 262 · 108610.1016/j.wear.2006.11.007 ↗
7. Tribol. Int. · 2013 · 57 · 16210.1016/j.triboint.2012.07.019 ↗
8. Chin. J. Mech. Eng. · 2012 · 48 · 10210.3901/jme.2012.23.102 ↗
9. J. Tribol. · 2013 · 33 · 18410.16078/j.tribology.2013.02.012 ↗
10. Wear · 2007 · 263 · 151810.1016/j.wear.2007.01.081 ↗
11. P. I. Mech. Eng. C-J. Mec. · 2008 · 222 · 27910.1243/13506501jet358 ↗
12. J. Mater. Proc. Tech. · 2003 · 134 · 19010.1016/s0924-0136(02)01002-6 ↗
13. Wear · 1993 · 160 · 11910.1016/0043-1648(93)90412-f ↗
14. Wear · 1980 · 58 · 4910.1016/0043-1648(80)90212-4 ↗
15. Surf. Coat. Tech. · 1996 · 86-87 · 51110.1016/s0257-8972(96)03078-2 ↗
16. Friction · 2014 · 2 · 31010.1007/s40544-014-0048-0 ↗
17. Procedia Engineeing · 2017 · 206 · 66210.1016/j.proeng.2017.10.534 ↗
18. Mater. Sci. Appl. · 2014 · 5 · 4610.4236/msa.2014.51007 ↗
19. Lubr. Sci. · 2018 · 30 · 2310.1002/ls.1392 ↗
20. Plos One · 2015 · 10 · 110.1371/journal.pone.0135004 ↗
21. Eur. Phys. J. Plus. · 2017 · 132 · 15810.1140/epjp/i2017-11428-6 ↗
22. ISRN Tribology · 2013 · 1 · 110.5402/2013/724307 ↗
23. Mater. Res. Exp. · 2016 · 3 · 7510.1088/2053-1591/3/7/075001 ↗