On the discrimination between nucleation and propagation in nanomagnetic logic devices
Source abstract
Abstract
In this paper we present the extensive nucleation and propagation characterization of fabricated nanomagnets by applying ns-range magnetic field pulses. For that, an artificial nucleation center (ANC) is created by focused ion beam irradiation (FIB) of a 50 x 50 nm area at the side of a Co/Pt island as typically used in Nanomagnetic Logic with perpendicular anisotropy (pNML). Laser-Kerr Microscope is applied for statistical evaluation of the switching probability of the whole magnet, while the wide-field-Kerr microscopy is employed to discriminate between the nucleation process (which takes place at the irradiated ANC area) and the domain wall propagation process along the magnet. We show that the nanomagnet can be treated as a single Stoner-Wolfhart particle above 100 ns field-pulse width, as the whole magnetization is switched during the field-pulse. By contrary, for field-pulse width below 100 ns, the domain wall (DW) motion is the limiting process hindering full magnetization reversal on that time-scale. However, the nucleation still follows the Arrhenius law. The results allow precise understanding of the reversal process and highlight the need for faster DW speed in pNML materials.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Magnetic properties of thin films · Advanced Electron Microscopy Techniques and Applications · Ion-surface interactions and analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Chair of Circuit Design, Technical University of Munich (TUM) 1 , Germany
Faculty of Information Technology and Bionics, Pázmány Péter Catholic University Budapest 2 , Hungary
Chair of Nanoelectronics, Technical University of Munich (TUM) 3 , Germany
Funding
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
References (16)
Show source-provided references
1. Solid-State Electronics · 2014 · 102 · 4610.1016/j.sse.2014.06.012 ↗
2. Journal of Applied Physics · 2014 · 115 · 17E51010.1063/1.4863810 ↗
3. Nanotechnology · 2014 · 25 · 33520210.1088/0957-4484/25/33/335202 ↗
4. Science · 2000 · 287 · 146610.1126/science.287.5457.1466 ↗
5. The nanoelectronics roadmap10.1002/9781118958254.ch01 ↗
6. Journal of Applied Physics · 2013 · 113 · 17B90210.1063/1.4794184 ↗
7. Journal of Applied Physics · 2015 · 117 · 17B50310.1063/1.4913729 ↗
8. Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter · 2012 · 24 · 02421610.1088/0953-8984/24/2/024216 ↗
9. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics · 2012 · 48 · 433610.1109/tmag.2012.2197184 ↗
10. 2015 · 121
11. AIP Advances · 2016 · 6 · 05640410.1063/1.4944336 ↗
12. AIP Advances · 2017 · 7 · 05662510.1063/1.4974021 ↗
13. Solid-State Electronics · 2016 · 125 · 24710.1016/j.sse.2016.05.013 ↗
14. Journal of Applied Physics · 1994 · 76 · 641310.1063/1.358282 ↗
15. 1999
16. EPL (Europhysics Letters) · 2016 · 113 · 6700110.1209/0295-5075/113/67001 ↗