Effect of nanostructure layout on spin pumping phenomena in antiferromagnet/nonmagnetic metal/ferromagnet multilayered stacks
Source abstract
Abstract
In this work we focus on magnetic relaxation in Mn80Ir20(12 nm)/Cu(6 nm)/Py(dF) antiferromagnet/Cu/ferromagnet (AFM/Cu/FM) multilayers with different thickness of the ferromagnetic permalloy layer. An effective FM-AFM interaction mediated via the conduction electrons in the nonmagnetic Cu spacer – the spin-pumping effect – is detected as an increase in the linewidth of the ferromagnetic resonance (FMR) spectra and a shift of the resonant magnetic field. We further find experimentally that the spin-pumping-induced contribution to the linewidth is inversely proportional to the thickness of the Py layer. We show that this thickness dependence likely originates from the dissipative dynamics of the free and localized spins in the AFM layer. The results obtained could be used for tailoring the dissipative properties of spintronic devices incorporating antiferromagnetic layers.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Magnetic properties of thin films · Theoretical and Computational Physics · Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Institute of Magnetism 1 , National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, 03680 Kyiv, Ukraine
Royal Institute of Technology 2 Nanostructure Physics, , 10691 Stockholm, Sweden
Johannes Gutenberg Universität Mainz 3 Institut für Physik, , D-55099 Mainz, Germany
National Technical University of Ukraine “KPI” 4 , 03056 Kyiv, Ukraine
Funding
ERC Synergy · Transregional Collaborative Research Center · National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine · Svenska Forskningsrådet Formas
References (26)
Show source-provided references
1. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A · 2011 · 369 · 309810.1098/rsta.2011.0014 ↗
2. Low Temp. Phys. · 2014 · 40 · 1710.1063/1.4862467 ↗
3. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2014 · 104 · 03240610.1063/1.4862971 ↗
4. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2016 · 116 · 07720310.1103/PhysRevLett.116.077203 ↗
5. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2014 · 113 · 09720210.1103/PhysRevLett.113.097202 ↗
6. Europhys. Lett. · 2014 · 108 · 5700510.1209/0295-5075/108/57005 ↗
7. Nat. Commun. · 2016 · 7 · 1267010.1038/ncomms12670 ↗
8. Phys. Rev. B · 2002 · 66 · 22440310.1103/PhysRevB.66.224403 ↗
9. Maekawa · 2012 · 8710.1093/acprof:oso/9780199600380.001.0001 ↗
10. J. Appl. Phys. · 2003 · 93 · 771710.1063/1.1543126 ↗
11. Phys. Rep. · 2006 · 427 · 15710.1016/j.physrep.2006.01.001 ↗
12. Phys. Rev. B · 2014 · 90 · 21440710.1103/PhysRevB.90.214407 ↗
13. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2014 · 113 · 05760110.1103/PhysRevLett.113.057601 ↗
14. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2014 · 113 · 19660210.1103/PhysRevLett.113.196602 ↗
15. Phys. Rev. B · 2012 · 86 · 21441310.1103/PhysRevB.86.214413 ↗
16. Rev. Mod. Phys. · 2005 · 77 · 137510.1103/RevModPhys.77.1375 ↗
17. Sov. J. Low Temp. Phys. · 1979 · 5 · 36110.1063/10.0029893 ↗
18. J. Magn. Soc. Jpn. · 2008 · 32 · 53510.3379/msjmag.32.535 ↗
19. Phys. Rev. · 1948 · 73 · 134910.1103/PhysRev.73.1349 ↗
20. Phys. Rev. B · 2014 · 89 · 08110510.1103/PhysRevB.89.081105 ↗
21. Phys. Rev. B · 2011 · 84 · 05441610.1103/PhysRevB.84.054416 ↗
22. Phys. Rev. B · 2014 · 89 · 17441710.1103/PhysRevB.89.174417 ↗
23. J. Appl. Phys. · 2011 · 109 · 07C50310.1063/1.3535340 ↗
24. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. · 2001 · 40 · 58010.1143/JJAP.40.580 ↗
25. Phys. Rev. B · 2016 · 94 · 06442910.1103/PhysRevB.94.064429 ↗
26. Phys. Rev. B · 2016 · 94 · 05441610.1103/PhysRevB.94.054416 ↗