journal article·2016-04-01Open access

Vacancy enhanced formation and phase transition of Cu-rich precipitates in α - iron under neutron irradiation

G. C. Lv, H. Zhang, X. F. He, W. Yang, Y. J. Su

AIP Advances· Volume 6· Issue 4

Abstract

In this paper, we employed both molecular statics and molecular dynamics simulation methods to investigate the role of vacancies in the formation and phase transition of Cu-rich precipitates in α-iron. The results indicated that vacancies promoted the diffusion of Cu atoms to form Cu-rich precipitates. After Cu-rich precipitates formed, they further trapped vacancies. The supersaturated vacancy concentration in the Cu-rich precipitate induced a shear strain, which triggered the phase transition from bcc to fcc structure by transforming the initial bcc (110) plane into fcc (111) plane. In addition, the formation of the fcc-twin structure and the stacking fault structure in the Cu-rich precipitates was observed in dynamics simulations.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Metallurgical Processes and Thermodynamics · Microstructure and mechanical properties · Fusion materials and technologies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

University of Science and Technology Beijing 1 Basic Experimental Center of Natural Science, , Beijing, 100083, China

University of Science and Technology Beijing 2 Corrosion and Protection Center, Key Laboratory of Environmental Fracture (MOE), , Beijing, 100083, China

University of Alberta 3 Department of Chemical and Materials Engineering, , Edmonton, Canada , T6G2V4

China Institute of Atomic Energy 4 , Beijing, 102413, China

References (46)

Show source-provided references
1. J. Nucl. Mater. · 2005 · 345 · 6510.1016/j.jnucmat.2005.05.001 ↗
2. J. Nucl. Mater. · 2002 · 300 · 12710.1016/S0022-3115(01)00752-8 ↗
3. Phys. Rev. B · 2001 · 63 · 13411010.1103/PhysRevB.63.134110 ↗
4. Phys. Rev. B · 2012 · 85 · 02420210.1103/PhysRevB.85.024202 ↗
5. J. Nucl. Mater. · 2010 · 406 · 7310.1016/j.jnucmat.2009.12.021 ↗
6. JOM · 2001 · 53 · 1810.1007/s11837-001-0081-0 ↗
7. Philos. Mag. Lett. · 1991 · 64 · 38310.1080/09500839108215121 ↗
8. Philos. Mag. A · 1994 · 70 · 110.1080/01418619408242533 ↗
9. Philos. Mag. Lett. · 1996 · 73 · 15510.1080/095008396180786 ↗
10. Philos. Mag. A · 2000 · 80 · 71110.1080/01418610008212077 ↗
11. Philos. Mag. · 2007 · 87 · 20910.1080/14786430600909014 ↗
12. Acta Mater. · 2001 · 49 · 266110.1016/S1359-6454(01)00178-1 ↗
13. Phys. Rev. B · 2013 · 88 · 02411610.1103/PhysRevB.88.024116 ↗
14. J. Nucl. Mater. · 2003 · 323 · 26810.1016/j.jnucmat.2003.08.028 ↗
15. Philos. Mag. & Philos. Mag. Lett. · 2009 · 89 · 3333
16. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2007 · 90 · 02190610.1063/1.2429902 ↗
17. Philos. Mag. & Philos. Mag. Lett. · 2007 · 87 · 925
18. Philos. Mag. A · 1997 · 75 · 109710.1080/01418619708214013 ↗
19. Acta Mater. · 2015 · 85 · 10710.1016/j.actamat.2014.11.026 ↗
20. Acta Mater. · 1996 · 44 · 378910.1016/1359-6454(95)00447-5 ↗
21. Philos. Mag. A · 2001 · 81 · 212710.1080/01418610108217139 ↗
22. Chin. Phys. Lett. · 2012 · 29 · 09610210.1088/0256-307X/29/9/096102 ↗
23. J. Nucl. Mater. · 2008 · 373 · 38710.1016/j.jnucmat.2007.06.016 ↗
24. Phil. Mag. A · 2003 · 83 · 397710.1080/14786430310001613264 ↗
25. Phys. Rev. B · 2001 · 63 · 22410610.1103/PhysRevB.63.224106 ↗
26. J. Nucl. Mater. · 2010 · 406 · 1910.1016/j.jnucmat.2010.05.017 ↗
27. Science · 2002 · 298 · 80710.1126/science.1076652 ↗
28. Acta Mater. · 2006 · 54 · 495310.1016/j.actamat.2006.08.004 ↗
29. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2006 · 97 · 17020110.1103/PhysRevLett.97.170201 ↗
30. Prog. Mater. Sci. · 2011 · 56 · 37910.1016/j.pmatsci.2010.12.002 ↗
31. J. Nucl. Mater. · 2007 · 360 · 11810.1016/j.jnucmat.2006.09.008 ↗
32. Philos. Mag. · 2009 · 89 · 353110.1080/14786430903299824 ↗
33. Modelling Simul. Mater. Sci. Eng. · 2009 · 17 · 02501010.1088/0965-0393/17/2/025010 ↗
34. J. Nucl. Mater. · 2013 · 442 · 28210.1016/j.jnucmat.2013.08.018 ↗
35. J. Nucl. Mater. · 2010 · 406 · 5510.1016/j.jnucmat.2010.05.018 ↗
36. J. Nucl. Mater. · 2011 · 414 · 16110.1016/j.jnucmat.2011.02.051 ↗
37. Comput. Mater. Sci. · 2015 · 101 · 18110.1016/j.commatsci.2015.01.041 ↗
38. J. Nucl. Mater. · 2014 · 451 · 8210.1016/j.jnucmat.2014.03.031 ↗
39. Acta Mater. · 2007 · 55 · 110.1016/j.actamat.2006.05.029 ↗
40. Phys. Rev. B · 2005 · 71 · 17420510.1103/PhysRevB.71.174205 ↗
41. Comput. Mater. Sci. · 2004 · 31 · 34710.1016/j.commatsci.2004.03.023 ↗
42. J. Nucl. Mater. · 1978 · 69-70 · 7010.1016/0022-3115(78)90237-4 ↗
43. Phys. Rev. B · 2007 · 76 · 21410210.1103/PhysRevB.76.214102 ↗
44. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. B · 2013 · 303 · 2810.1016/j.nimb.2013.01.049 ↗
45. Comput. Mater. Sci. · 1994 · 2 · 27910.1016/0927-0256(94)90109-0 ↗
46. Acta Mater. · 2013 · 61 · 51910.1016/j.actamat.2012.09.068 ↗