Numerical analysis on the characteristics of particle orbits in quasi-axisymmetric stellarator
Source abstract
Abstract
Based on the magnetic field configuration of the Chinese First Quasi-axisymmetric Stellarator (CFQS) device, three types of orbits such as the passing orbit, blocked trapped orbit, and localized trapped orbit are simulated using the Boris algorithm. Also, the orbital topology, orbit transition, and loss characteristics of these particles under different initial conditions are studied in this paper. It is found that there exists a transition from blocked trapped orbits to localized trapped orbits due to small continuous helical ripples. This phenomenon is analyzed as follows: we define the angle between the particle drift velocity (v→D) and the radial direction (ρ^) as β. If the blocked-localized transition appears in the region where β>90○, the localized particles will return to the blocked particles and be constrained. However, if the blocked-localized transition happens in the region where β<90○, localized particles will drift out of the last closed flux surface and be lost. The simulation results show that the loss of localized particles in the CFQS is mainly located in some specific regions within the vicinity of the toroidal angle φ=0○,180○ and the poloidal angle θ=90○.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Magnetic confinement fusion research · Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics · Astro and Planetary Science
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
College of Physics, Sichuan University 1 , Chengdu 610065, China
Key Laboratory of High Energy Density Physic and Technology of Ministry of Education, Sichuan University 2 , Chengdu 610065, China
Institute of Fusion Science, Southwest Jiaotong University 3 , Chengdu 610031, China
Funding
Foundation for Innovative Research Groups of the National Natural Science Foundation of China · National Magnetic Confinement Fusion Program of China · The National Natural Science Foundation of China
References (30)
Show source-provided references
1. Matter Radiat. Extremes · 2016 · 1 · 19210.1016/j.mre.2016.07.001 ↗
2. Phys. Plasmas · 1998 · 5 · 164710.1063/1.872833 ↗
3. Plasma Phys. Controlled Fusion · 1999 · 41 · A15910.1088/0741-3335/41/3a/010 ↗
4. Plasma Phys. Controlled Fusion · 2003 · 45 · 182910.1088/0741-3335/45/10/001 ↗
5. Fusion Sci. Technol. · 2017 · 50 · 17110.13182/fst06-a1232 ↗
6. Nucl. Fusion · 2016 · 56 · 09200610.1088/0029-5515/56/9/092006 ↗
7. Nucl. Fusion · 2014 · 54 · 07300210.1088/0029-5515/54/7/073002 ↗
8. Phys. Plasmas · 2013 · 20 · 01251110.1063/1.4813247 ↗
9. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1997 · 78 · 67410.1103/physrevlett.78.674 ↗
10. Phys. Lett. A · 1988 · 129 · 11310.1016/0375-9601(88)90080-1 ↗
11. Plasma Fusion Res. · 2018 · 13 · 340312310.1585/pfr.13.3403123 ↗
12. Nucl. Fusion · 2019 · 59 · 02601410.1088/1741-4326/aaf604 ↗
13. Plasma Phys. Controlled Fusion · 1995 · 37 · A10310.1088/0741-3335/37/11a/007 ↗
14. Plasma Phys. Controlled Fusion · 2001 · 43 · A23710.1088/0741-3335/43/12a/318 ↗
15. J. Nucl. Mater. · 2005 · 337-339 · 40010.1016/j.jnucmat.2004.10.122 ↗
16. J. Plasma Fusion Res. SERIES · 2004 · 6 · 622
17. Plasma Fusion Res. · 2018 · 13 · 340506710.1585/pfr.13.3405067 ↗
18. Nucl. Fusion · 2001 · 41 · 186510.1088/0029-5515/41/12/314 ↗
19. Phys. Plasmas · 2014 · 21 · 06250110.1063/1.4876740 ↗
20. Phys. Plasmas · 1999 · 6 · 350910.1063/1.873611 ↗
21. Phys. Fluids · 1967 · 10 · 265310.1063/1.1762089 ↗
22. Fusion Eng. Des. · 2003 · 65 · 10910.1016/s0920-3796(02)00387-3 ↗
23. Nucl. Fusion · 1987 · 27 · 86710.1088/0029-5515/27/5/018 ↗
24. 1970 · 3
25. 1985 · 356
26. Phys. Plasmas · 2013 · 20 · 08450310.1063/1.4818428 ↗
27. Phys. Plasmas · 2015 · 22 · 12450310.1063/1.4938034 ↗
28. Phys. Lett. A · 2017 · 381 · 56810.1016/j.physleta.2016.12.031 ↗
29. J. Natl. Univ. Def. Technol. · 2003 · 26 · 83
30. 1998