Microwave-excited hybrid thermoacoustic and ultrasound imaging with microwave pulse-width modulation
Source abstract
Abstract
We present a method that allows for hybrid microwave-excited thermoacoustic and ultrasound (HMTAU) imaging without an additional ultrasound transmitting circuitry. The same microwave pulse is used to simultaneously generate thermoacoustic (TA) signals from the sample by the thermoacoustic effect, and ultrasound (US) signals from the piezoelectric transducer by the inverse piezoelectric effect. The same transducer collects the US signals reflected from the sample as a result of the US pulse (pulse-echo) and the TA signals as a result of the sample absorbing microwaves. Experiments are conducted to show how the microwave pulse-width significantly impacts the excitation efficiency of ultrasonic waves, which can reduce the requirement for microwave power. We found that the mechanical response of the US transducer to this transient expansion shows a maximum if the pulse-width of the microwave is close to half of the center period of the US transducer. We also use phantom experiments to demonstrate the complementary contrast mechanisms of the two modalities. The results obtained indicate that our method offers the potential of a low-cost dual-modality technique for noninvasive biomedical imaging.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Photoacoustic and Ultrasonic Imaging · Ultrasound and Hyperthermia Applications · Thermography and Photoacoustic Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Physical Electronics, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China 1 , Chengdu 611731, China
Center for Information in Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China 2 , Chengdu 611731, China
Department of Medical Engineering, University of South Florida 3 , Tampa, Florida 33620, USA
References (23)
Show source-provided references
1. IEEE Trans Med Imaging · 2016 · 35 · 83910.1109/tmi.2015.2497901 ↗
2. Journal of Innovative Optical Health Sciences · 2017
3. Medical Physics · 2016 · 43 · 622610.1118/1.4966031 ↗
4. Scientific Reports · 2018 · 8 · 1552210.1038/s41598-018-33732-0 ↗
5. IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics Ferroelectrics & Frequency Control · 2015 · 63 · 24510.1109/tuffc.2015.2513018 ↗
6. IEEE T Ultrason Ferr · 2006 · 53 · 54210.1109/tuffc.2006.1610562 ↗
7. Radiology · 2000 · 216 · 27910.1148/radiology.216.1.r00jl30279 ↗
8. Radiology · 1999 · 211 · 27510.1148/radiology.211.1.r99ap05275 ↗
9. Medical Physics · 2017 · 44 · 149410.1002/mp.12138 ↗
10. Inverse Problems · 2008 · 24 · 05500610.1088/0266-5611/24/5/055006 ↗
11. Physics in Medicine & Biology · 2008 · 53 · 497110.1088/0031-9155/53/18/008 ↗
12. Physics in Medicine & Biology · 2006 · 51 · 643710.1088/0031-9155/51/24/010 ↗
13. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging · 2013 · 32 · 28910.1109/tmi.2012.2224667 ↗
14. Medical Physics · 2008 · 35 · 320510.1118/1.2938731 ↗
15. Oraevsky · 2010
16. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · 2013 · 32 · 28910.1109/tmi.2012.2224667 ↗
17. Applied Physics Letters · 2015 · 107 · 16410310.1063/1.4934699 ↗
18. Applied Physics Letters · 2017 · 110 · 18370110.1063/1.4983166 ↗
19. Journal of Innovative Optical Health Sciences · 2017
20. J. Appl. Phys. · 1963 · 34 · 355910.1063/1.1729258 ↗
21. J. Appl. Phys. · 1963 · 34 · 212310.1063/1.1729762 ↗
22. 1997 · 27
23. 2012