Link between hopping models and percolation scaling laws for charge transport in mixtures of small molecules
Source abstract
Abstract
Mixed host compositions that combine charge transport materials with luminescent dyes offer superior control over exciton formation and charge transport in organic light emitting devices (OLEDs). Two approaches are typically used to optimize the fraction of charge transport materials in a mixed host composition: either an empirical percolative model, or a hopping transport model. We show that these two commonly-employed models are linked by an analytic expression which relates the localization length to the percolation threshold and critical exponent. The relation is confirmed both numerically and experimentally through measurements of the relative conductivity of Tris(4-carbazoyl-9-ylphenyl)amine (TCTA) :1,3-bis(3,5-dipyrid-3-yl-phenyl)benzene (BmPyPb) mixtures with different concentrations, where the TCTA plays a role as hole conductor and the BmPyPb as hole insulator. The analytic relation may allow the rational design of mixed layers of small molecules for high-performance OLEDs.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Organic Light-Emitting Diodes Research · Organic Electronics and Photovoltaics · Conducting polymers and applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Massachusetts Institute of Technology 1 Department of Materials Science and Engineering, , Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, USA
Seoul National University 2 Department of Materials Science and Engineering, , 151-744 Seoul, Korea
Massachusetts Institute of Technology 3 Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, , Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, USA
References (31)
Show source-provided references
1. J. Appl. Phys. · 2008 · 104 · 09450110.1063/1.3000046 ↗
2. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2010 · 97 · 03330410.1063/1.3464969 ↗
3. Adv. Funct. Mater. · 2013 · 23 · 491410.1002/adfm.201300547 ↗
4. Adv. Mater. · 2014 · 26 · 473010.1002/adma.201400955 ↗
5. Adv. Funct. Mater. · 2015 · 25 · 36110.1002/adfm.201402707 ↗
6. Chem. Mater. · 2006 · 18 · 238910.1021/cm0600677 ↗
7. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2007 · 91 · 14210610.1063/1.2787890 ↗
8. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2008 · 93 · 07330410.1063/1.2973151 ↗
9. Org. Electron. · 2012 · 13 · 307410.1016/j.orgel.2012.08.029 ↗
10. Org. Electron. · 2013 · 14 · 331210.1016/j.orgel.2013.09.039 ↗
11. 1994
12. Phys. Rev. B · 1994 · 50 · 1393110.1103/PhysRevB.50.13931 ↗
13. Phys. Rev. B · 1997 · 56 · 460410.1103/PhysRevB.56.4604 ↗
14. Phys. Rev. B · 1998 · 58 · 777410.1103/PhysRevB.58.7774 ↗
15. Phys. Status Solidi B · 2000 · 218 · 27310.1002/(SICI)1521-3951(200003)218:1<273::AID-PSSB273>3.0.CO;2-S ↗
16. Phys. Rev. B · 2004 · 70 · 18420310.1103/PhysRevB.70.184203 ↗
17. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2012 · 108 · 02660110.1103/PhysRevLett.108.026601 ↗
18. Phys. Rev. · 1960 · 120 · 74510.1103/PhysRev.120.745 ↗
19. J. Appl. Phys. · 1972 · 43 · 503310.1063/1.1661065 ↗
20. Polym. J. · 1985 · 17 · 55710.1295/polymj.17.557 ↗
21. Philos. Mag. Part B · 1986 · 53 · 2510.1080/13642818608238969 ↗
22. Phys. Rev. B · 2004 · 69 · 01420610.1103/PhysRevB.69.014206 ↗
23. Phys. Status Solidi B · 2014 · 251 · 48710.1002/pssb.201350339 ↗
24. Phys. Status Solidi B · 1993 · 175 · 1510.1002/pssb.2221750102 ↗
25. Synth. Met. · 1998 · 93 · 16910.1016/S0379-6779(97)04093-9 ↗
26. Nat. Mater. · 2006 · 5 · 95010.1038/nmat1779 ↗
27. 1984
28. J. Phys. Condens. Matter · 2015 · 27 · 09320110.1088/0953-8984/27/9/093201 ↗
29. Philos. Mag. Part B · 2001 · 81 · 98510.1080/13642810108205785 ↗
30. J. Phys. C Solid State Phys. · 1979 · 12 · 32110.1088/0022-3719/12/2/020 ↗
31. Rev. Mod. Phys. · 1973 · 45 · 57410.1103/RevModPhys.45.574 ↗