journal article·2023-09-01Open access

Excitation of radially propagating electrostatic shear Alfvén wave during the formation of ambipolar radial electric field in a stochastic magnetic field

Jinxiang You, Shaojie Wang

AIP Advances· Volume 13· Issue 9

Abstract

A radially propagating electrostatic shear Alfvén wave (ωH mode) is found during the formation of ambipolar radial electric field in a magnetic stochastic layer through gyrokinetic simulation. It is found that the times scale of the ambipolar radial electric field formation is the damping time of the ωH mode. The frequency and damping rate of the ωH mode are theoretical derived, which are in good agreement with the simulation results.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Magnetic confinement fusion research · Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics · Geomagnetism and Paleomagnetism Studies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Engineering and Applied Physics, University of Science and Technology of China , Hefei 230026, China

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China · National MCF Energy R&D Program of China

References (34)

Show source-provided references
1. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2004 · 92 · 23500310.1103/physrevlett.92.235003 ↗
2. J. Nucl. Mater. · 2005 · 337 · 69110.1016/j.jnucmat.2004.10.062 ↗
3. Nat. Phys. · 2006 · 2 · 41910.1038/nphys312 ↗
4. Nucl. Fusion · 2019 · 59 · 12604510.1088/1741-4326/ab4631 ↗
5. Nucl. Fusion · 2018 · 58 · 09603110.1088/1741-4326/aace93 ↗
6. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2016 · 117 · 11500110.1103/physrevlett.117.115001 ↗
7. Nucl. Fusion · 2021 · 61 · 10603710.1088/1741-4326/ac1a1d ↗
8. Nucl. Fusion · 2008 · 48 · 02400510.1088/0029-5515/48/2/024005 ↗
9. J. Comput. Phys. · 2009 · 228 · 774210.1016/j.jcp.2009.07.015 ↗
10. Nucl. Fusion · 2019 · 59 · 12600910.1088/1741-4326/ab3be2 ↗
11. Phys. Plasmas · 2000 · 7 · 368110.1063/1.1287744 ↗
12. Nucl. Fusion · 2020 · 60 · 12602710.1088/1741-4326/abb422 ↗
13. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1978 · 40 · 3810.1103/physrevlett.40.38 ↗
14. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1981 · 47 · 10210.1103/physrevlett.47.102 ↗
15. Phys. Plasmas · 2011 · 18 · 04250510.1063/1.3578366 ↗
16. Phys. Plasmas · 2016 · 23 · 02230310.1063/1.4941597 ↗
17. Phys. Plasmas · 2018 · 25 · 04250110.1063/1.5023321 ↗
18. Phys. Plasmas · 2016 · 23 · 05450310.1063/1.5023167 ↗
19. Phys. Plasmas · 2010 · 17 · 10250310.1063/1.3487733 ↗
20. J. Comput. Phys. · 2016 · 316 · 18010.1016/j.jcp.2016.03.068 ↗
21. Comput. Phys. Commun. · 2019 · 242 · 7210.1016/j.cpc.2019.04.004 ↗
22. Ann. Phys. · 1983 · 151 · 110.1016/0003-4916(83)90313-5 ↗
23. Phys. Plasmas · 2012 · 19 · 06250410.1063/1.4729660 ↗
24. Phys. Plasmas · 2013 · 20 · 08231210.1063/1.4818593 ↗
25. Phys. Fluids · 1983 · 26 · 55610.1063/1.864140 ↗
26. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1979 · 43 · 150610.1103/physrevlett.43.1506 ↗
27. Phys. Fluids · 1980 · 23 · 122910.1063/1.863102 ↗
28. Phys. Plasmas · 2018 · 25 · 06230110.1063/1.5018662 ↗
29. Sov. Phys. Usp · 1972 · 14 · 54910.1070/pu1972v014n05abeh004669 ↗
30. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1976 · 36 · 58710.1103/physrevlett.36.587 ↗
31. Plasma Phys. Controlled Fusion · 1993 · 35 · 59510.1088/0741-3335/35/5/005 ↗
32. Phys. Plasmas · 2016 · 23 · 07251010.1063/1.4960035 ↗
33. Phys. Plasmas · 1998 · 5 · 390110.1063/1.873109 ↗
34. Phys. Plasmas · 2001 · 8 · 443510.1063/1.1400124 ↗