journal article·2022-03-01Open access

Electrical detection of ferromagnetic resonance in bulk YIG sample covered with a layer of silver paint

Yong Heng Lee, R. Mahendiran

AIP Advances· Volume 12· Issue 3

Abstract

We studied the electrical impedance of a bulk polycrystalline YIG sample at room temperature as a function of varying dc magnetic field (H) and frequency of the microwave (MW) signal (f = 0.9 GHz to 3 GHz) using a single port impedance analyzer. As the YIG sample is an insulator, silver paint was coated on the top surface and the two ends of the sample to allow the MW current to flow between the signal line and ground plane. While H is swept from -5.2 kOe to +5.2 kOe, a sharp peak in resistance and a dip in reactance appear at a specific value of field H = ±Hr. The amplitude of the peak in resistance and the value of Hr increase with frequency of the MW signal. The positive magnetoresistance at the peak is 2300% for 3 GHz. Similar but sharp features were also detected in YIG thin films coated with Ag-paint. We attribute these features in magnetoimpedance to Oersted field-induced ferromagnetic resonance in the underneath YIG sample.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Magnetic properties of thin films · Magneto-Optical Properties and Applications · Photonic Crystals and Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Physics, National University of Singapore , 2 Science Drive 3, Singapore 117551, Republic of Singapore

Funding

Ministry of Education Singapore

References (27)

Show source-provided references
1. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. · 2018 · 51 · 31300110.1088/1361-6463/aaca89 ↗
2. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. · 2018 · 51 · 25300110.1088/1361-6463/aac249 ↗
3. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2017 · 110 · 09240310.1063/1.4977490 ↗
4. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2013 · 110 · 20660110.1103/physrevlett.110.206601 ↗
5. Nature Commun. · 2016 · 7 · 1037710.1038/ncomms10377 ↗
6. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2013 · 102 · 01240210.1063/1.4773993 ↗
7. J. Appl. Phys. · 2014 · 116 · 15390210.1063/1.4898161 ↗
8. J. Appl. Phys. · 2015 · 117 · 17260310.1063/1.4913813 ↗
9. Phys. Rev. B · 2015 · 92 · 05443710.1103/physrevb.92.054437 ↗
10. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. · 2014 · 368 · 39310.1016/j.jmmm.2014.06.004 ↗
11. J. Magn. Magn. · 2017 · 439 · 27710.1016/j.jmmm.2017.04.098 ↗
12. Sharma · AIP Adv. · 2017 · 7 · 05640510.1063/1.4973199 ↗
13. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2012 · 101 · 13241410.1063/1.4754837 ↗
14. Sensors · 2021 · 21 · 614510.3390/s21186145 ↗
15. Nano Lett. · 2017 · 17 · 810.1021/acs.nanolett.6b02794 ↗
16. Phys. Rev. B · 2015 · 92 · 14441110.1103/physrevb.92.144411 ↗
17. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. · 2020 · 499 · 16628710.1016/j.jmmm.2019.166287 ↗
18. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2019 · 115 · 09240510.1063/1.5109371 ↗
19. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces · 2020 · 12 · 4180210.1021/acsami.0c13213 ↗
20. J. Alloys Compd. · 2021 · 865 · 15890310.1016/j.jallcom.2021.158903 ↗
21. Phys. Rev. B · 2014 · 90 · 17441910.1103/physrevb.90.174419 ↗
22. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. · 2019 · 480 · 610.1016/j.jmmm.2019.02.051 ↗
23. Mater. Lett. · 2019 · 256 · 12666210.1016/j.matlet.2019.126662 ↗
24. Phys. Rev. B · 2017 · 96 · 060408(R)10.1103/physrevb.96.060408 ↗
25. Phys. Rev. B · 2011 · 84 · 05442310.1103/physrevb.84.054423 ↗
26. Phys. Rev. · 1948 · 73 · 15510.1103/physrev.73.155 ↗
27. IEEE Trans. Magn. · 2013 · 49 · 99010.1109/tmag.2012.2228172 ↗