Multiple order spin-wave resonance in composition gradient sputtering FeCoB thin films
Source abstract
Abstract
FeCoB films with different B doping contents and different thicknesses were deposited by composition gradient sputtering. The results show that in-plane anisotropy fields and exchange constants change with the increasing B contents and increasing thickness, respectively. Both results of the composition-gradient films and the thickness-dependent films and the micromagnetic simulation indicate that multiple order spin-wave resonances are easy to obtain in the films with the large in-plane anisotropy field. We observed four resonance peaks including three perpendicular standing spin waves. The hysteresis loop and magnetic domain results indicate that such films also have good magnetic softness and an in-plane homogeneous domain structure.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Magnetic properties of thin films · Magnetic Properties and Applications · Magnetic Properties of Alloys
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
College of Physics, Center for Marine Observation and Communications, National Demonstration Center for Experimental Applied Physics Education, Qingdao University 1 , Qingdao 266071, People’s Republic of China
Peter Grünberg Institute, Forschungszentrum Jülich 2 , 52425 Jülich, Germany
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China · China Postdoctoral Science Foundation
References (33)
Show source-provided references
1. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2010 · 105 · 06720810.1103/physrevlett.105.067208 ↗
2. Nat. Commun. · 2017 · 8 · 1500710.1038/ncomms15007 ↗
3. Phys. Rev. B · 2019 · 100 · 10440610.1103/physrevb.100.104406 ↗
4. Phys. Rep. · 2011 · 507 · 10710.1016/j.physrep.2011.06.003 ↗
5. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. · 2015 · 48 · 01500110.1088/0022-3727/48/1/015001 ↗
6. J. Alloys Compd. · 2021 · 869 · 15932710.1016/j.jallcom.2021.159327 ↗
7. Phys. Rev. B · 2019 · 100 · 02443510.1103/physrevb.100.024435 ↗
8. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. · 2017 · 50 · 41500310.1088/1361-6463/aa81a5 ↗
9. J. Appl. Phys. · 2016 · 120 · 18390210.1063/1.4967826 ↗
10. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. · 2015 · 395 · 1810.1016/j.jmmm.2015.06.073 ↗
11. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. · 2015 · 48 · 39500110.1088/0022-3727/48/39/395001 ↗
12. Phys. Rev. B · 2012 · 86 · 01440110.1103/physrevb.86.014401 ↗
13. Phys. Rev. B · 2013 · 87 · 14442610.1103/physrevb.87.144426 ↗
14. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2018 · 120 · 12720110.1103/physrevlett.120.127201 ↗
15. Phys. Rev. B · 2011 · 83 · 05443110.1103/physrevb.83.054431 ↗
16. J. Appl. Phys. · 2015 · 118 · 05391010.1063/1.4928082 ↗
17. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2017 · 111 · 04240410.1063/1.4995991 ↗
18. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2010 · 97 · 09250610.1063/1.3483136 ↗
19. J. Appl. Phys. · 2012 · 111 · 07C91910.1063/1.3679433 ↗
20. Phys. Rev. B · 2010 · 82 · 06440310.1103/physrevb.82.064403 ↗
21. J. Appl. Phys. · 2010 · 108 · 02390710.1063/1.3435318 ↗
22. AIP Adv. · 2017 · 7 · 11500910.1063/1.5001716 ↗
23. J. Appl. Phys. · 2008 · 103 · 07E73610.1063/1.2838226 ↗
24. IEEE Trans. Magn. · 2017 · 53 · 200070610.1109/tmag.2016.2646662 ↗
25. IEEE Magn. Lett. · 2018 · 9 · 510130510.1109/lmag.2017.2779101 ↗
26. Sci. Rep. · 2015 · 5 · 1702310.1038/srep17023 ↗
27. J. Alloys Compd. · 2016 · 688 · 91710.1016/j.jallcom.2016.07.110 ↗
28. J. Appl. Phys. · 2006 · 99 · 08M30210.1063/1.2165583 ↗
29. J. Appl. Phys. · 1960 · 31 · 175510.1063/1.1735441 ↗
30. J. Appl. Phys. · 1977 · 48 · 135510.1063/1.323730 ↗
31. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. · 2012 · 324 · 289910.1016/j.jmmm.2012.04.035 ↗
32. Phys. Rev. · 1948 · 73 · 15510.1103/physrev.73.155 ↗
33. IEEE Trans. Magn. · 2016 · 52 · 200310410.1109/TMAG.2016.2520981 ↗