journal article·2017-03-01Open access

Microstructure and coercivity in La-coated Nd2Fe14B thin films

M. Itakura, J. Fukuda, K. Koike, H. Ishikawa, D. Ogawa, H. Kato

AIP Advances· Volume 7· Issue 3

Abstract

We investigated La-coated Nd2Fe14B thin film magnets by scanning/transmission electron microscopy to clarify the coercivity enhancement mechanism in Nd-Fe-B permanent magnets. The coercivity of La-coated film magnets was increased from 8.5 to 15 kOe by post-annealing. The fcc-LaOx layer was epitaxially grown on [001]-oriented Nd2Fe14B fine grains with a crystallographic orientation relation of Nd2Fe14B (001)[110] || LaOx (111)[112¯], both in the as-deposited and post-annealed films. STEM-EDS elemental analysis revealed that the only difference caused by post-annealing was the O content in the LaOx layer, which increased from 15 to 35 at.%. These results suggest that the magnetocrystalline anisotropy of the Nd ions, which were reduced at the surface of Nd2Fe14B, would be recovered by the presence of O, leading to a remarkable increase in the coercivity.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Magnetic Properties of Alloys · Magnetic properties of thin films · Hydrogen Storage and Materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Kyushu University 1 Department of Engineering Sciences for Electronics and Materials, , Kasuga 816-8580, Japan

Kyushu University 2 Department of Applied Science for Electronics and Materials, Interdisciplinary Graduate School of Engineering Sciences, , Kasuga 816-8580, Japan

Yamagata University 3 Department of Applied Mathematics and Physics, , Yonezawa 992-8510, Japan

References (34)

Show source-provided references
1. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. · 2002 · 242–245 · 132910.1016/s0304-8853(01)00967-2 ↗
2. J. Appl. Phys. · 2005 · 97 · 05350410.1063/1.1851017 ↗
3. Scripta Mater. · 2008 · 59 · 18310.1016/j.scriptamat.2008.03.003 ↗
4. J. Appl. Phys. · 2008 · 144 · 01391110.1063/1.2952556 ↗
5. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. · 2010 · 322 · 334610.1016/j.jmmm.2010.06.023 ↗
6. J. Appl. Phys. · 2009 · 105 · 07A74110.1063/1.3076050 ↗
7. Mater. Trans. · 2009 · 50 · 213910.2320/matertrans.maw200913 ↗
8. Scripta Mater. · 2008 · 59 · 17910.1016/j.scriptamat.2008.03.004 ↗
9. IOP Conf. Ser.: Mater. Sci. Eng. · 2009 · 1 · 01203310.1088/1757-8981/1/1/012033 ↗
10. J. Phys: Conf. Ser. · 2011 · 266 · 01203910.1088/1742-6596/266/1/012039 ↗
11. Acta Mater. · 2011 · 59 · 306110.1016/j.actamat.2011.01.046 ↗
12. Mater. Trans. · 2007 · 48 · 91510.2320/matertrans.48.915 ↗
13. Scripta Mater. · 2013 · 68 · 68710.1016/j.scriptamat.2013.01.019 ↗
14. J. Microscopy · 2009 · 236 · 10410.1111/j.1365-2818.2009.03231.x ↗
15. Mater. Trans. · 2011 · 52 · 223910.2320/matertrans.m2011180 ↗
16. J. Appl. Phys. · 2009 · 105 · 07A74010.1063/1.3073931 ↗
17. J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. · 2011 · 266 · 01204610.1088/1742-6596/266/1/012046 ↗
18. Appl. Phys. Exp. · 2011 · 4 · 11300210.1143/apex.4.113002 ↗
19. J. Appl. Phys. · 2014 · 115 · 17A70310.1063/1.4860937 ↗
20. J. Appl. Phys. · 2015 · 117 · 22390510.1063/1.4922500 ↗
21. Scripta Mater. · 2011 · 65 · 39610.1016/j.scriptamat.2011.05.006 ↗
22. Acta Mater. · 2012 · 60 · 81910.1016/j.actamat.2011.10.043 ↗
23. Scripta Mater. · 2014 · 89 · 2910.1016/j.scriptamat.2014.06.020 ↗
24. Acta Mater. · 2014 · 71 · 37010.1016/j.actamat.2014.03.013 ↗
25. J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. · 2010 · 200 · 08201510.1088/1742-6596/200/8/082015 ↗
26. J. Appl. Phys. · 2014 · 115 · 17A73510.1063/1.4866893 ↗
27. Phys. Proc. · 2015 · 75 · 129410.1016/j.phpro.2015.12.144 ↗
28. Acta Mater. · 2015 · 84 · 40510.1016/j.actamat.2014.10.008 ↗
29. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2015 · 107 · 10240610.1063/1.4930829 ↗
30. Nano. Res. Lett. · 2016 · 11 · 3310.1186/s11671-016-1227-x ↗
31. 2012 · 135
32. IEEE Trans. Magn. · 2014 · 50 · 210500410.1109/tmag.2014.2329294 ↗
33. Oxidation of Metals · 2003 · 59 · 16710.1023/a:1023078218047 ↗
34. J. Appl. Phys. · 1997 · 81 · 444410.1063/1.364970 ↗