Propagation of femtosecond terawatt laser pulses in N2 gas including higher-order Kerr effects
Source abstract
Abstract
Propagation characteristic of femtosecond terawatt laser pulses in N2 gas with higher-order Kerr effect (HOKE) is investigated. Theoretical analysis shows that HOKE acting as Hamiltonian perturbation can destroy the coherent structure of a laser field and result in the appearance of incoherent patterns. Numerical simulations show that in this case two different types of complex structures can appear. It is found that the high-order focusing terms in HOKE can cause continuous phase shift and off-axis evolution of the laser fields when irregular homoclinic orbit crossings of the field in phase space take place. As the laser propagates, small-scale spatial structures rapidly appear and the evolution of the laser field becomes chaotic. The two complex patterns can switch between each other quasi-periodically. Numerical results show that the two complex patterns are associated with the stochastic evolution of the energy contained in the higher-order shorter-wavelength Fourier modes. Such complex patterns, associated with small-scale filaments, may be typical for laser propagation in a HOKE medium.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Laser-Matter Interactions and Applications · Advanced Fiber Laser Technologies · Laser-Plasma Interactions and Diagnostics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Peking University 1 HEDPS, Center for Applied Physics and Technology, , Beijing 100871, People's Republic of China
Institute of Applied Physics and Computational Mathematics 2 , Beijing 100094, People's Republic of China
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China
References (33)
Show source-provided references
1. Opt. Lett. · 1995 · 20 · 7310.1364/OL.20.000073 ↗
2. Appl. Phys. B · 2000 · 71 · 57310.1007/s003400000375 ↗
3. Phys. Plasmas · 2004 · 11 · 536010.1063/1.1803841 ↗
4. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2007 · 91 · 22111410.1063/1.2819611 ↗
5. Science · 2003 · 301 · 6110.1126/science.1085020 ↗
6. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2008 · 100 · 11390210.1103/PhysRevLett.100.113902 ↗
7. Opt. Express · 2008 · 16 · 46610.1364/OE.16.000466 ↗
8. Opt. Express · 2009 · 17 · 1342910.1364/OE.17.013429 ↗
9. Laser Physics · 2011 · 21 · 131910.1134/S1054660X11130196 ↗
10. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2010 · 104 · 10390310.1103/PhysRevLett.104.103903 ↗
11. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2011 · 106 · 15390210.1103/PhysRevLett.106.153902 ↗
12. Opt. Lett. · 2001 · 26 · 84010.1364/OL.26.000840 ↗
13. Phys. Rev. A · 1990 · 41 · 372710.1103/PhysRevA.41.3727 ↗
14. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2010 · 105 · 20390410.1103/PhysRevLett.105.203904 ↗
15. Phys. Rev. A · 1992 · 46 · 227710.1103/PhysRevA.46.2277 ↗
16. Phys. Rev. E · 1994 · 50 · 413610.1103/PhysRevE.50.4136 ↗
17. 1983
18. 1999 · 27
19. Phys. Plasmas · 2007 · 14 · 11230110.1063/1.2803769 ↗
20. J. Opt. Soc. Am. B · 1988 · 5 · 202910.1364/JOSAB.5.002029 ↗
21. Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. · 1972 · 61 · 118
22. Sov. Phys. JETP · 1972 · 34 · 62
23. J. Plasmas Phys. · 1999 · 61 · 26310.1017/S0022377898007417 ↗
24. Laser and Particle beams. · 2000 · 18 · 7310.1017/S026303460018108X ↗
25. Phys. Rev. E · 1998 · 57 · 38110.1103/PhysRevE.57.381 ↗
26. J. Phys. A · 2000 · 33 · 911910.1088/0305-4470/33/49/307 ↗
27. Opt Lett. · 2011 · 36 · 390010.1364/OL.36.003900 ↗
28. Phys. Plasmas · 2001 · 8 · 311810.1063/1.1373419 ↗
29. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1990 · 64 · 41210.1103/PhysRevLett.64.412 ↗
30. Phys. Rev. E · 1994 · 49 · 441710.1103/PhysRevE.49.4417 ↗
31. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2006 · 96 · 02500310.1103/PhysRevLett.96.025003 ↗
32. Phys. Reps. · 1994 · 241 · 110.1016/0370-1573(94)90134-1 ↗
33. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1998 · 80 · 261010.1103/PhysRevLett.80.2610 ↗