Three techniques for measuring the transverse relaxation time of cesium atoms
Source abstract
Abstract
The transverse relaxation time (T2) is an important indicator to determine the fundamental sensitivity limit of alkali-metal atomic magnetometers. We propose a method based on the principle of longitudinal field modulation that obtains T2 by scanning the transverse static magnetic field. The previous technique of extracting T2 from the linewidth of the modulation frequency and the traditional magnetic-resonance-broadening-fitting method are also described. The T2 measurements of Cesium (Cs) atoms are carried out through these three methods, whose operating environments are applicable to different atomic magnetometers, respectively. The method that we propose can be used for obtaining the T2 of Cs atoms as well as detecting the transverse static magnetic field and is customized for the study of the Cs–Xenon ensemble for the construction of nuclear magnetic resonance gyroscopes. Moreover, the relationship between the limit sensitivities and cell temperatures is further studied in the experiment.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Atomic and Subatomic Physics Research · Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications · Quantum optics and atomic interactions
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
State Key Laboratory of Precision Spectroscopy, East China Normal University 1 , Shanghai 200241, China
Beijing Institute of Aerospace Control Devices 2 , Beijing 100094, China
Shanghai Branch, Hefei National Laboratory 3 , Shanghai 201315, China
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China · National Key Research and Development Program of China · Shanghai Municipal Science and Technology Major Project · Shanghai Excellent Academic Leaders Program
References (25)
Show source-provided references
1. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2006 · 89 · 21110410.1063/1.2392722 ↗
2. Phys. Rev. Appl. · 2020 · 14 · 01100210.1103/physrevapplied.14.011002 ↗
3. Rev. Sci. Instrum. · 2002 · 73 · 371710.1063/1.1510570 ↗
4. Phys. Rev. A · 1999 · 60 · 234610.1103/physreva.60.2346 ↗
5. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2010 · 104 · 01360110.1103/physrevlett.104.013601 ↗
6. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2002 · 89 · 13080110.1103/physrevlett.89.130801 ↗
7. Nature · 2003 · 422 · 59610.1038/nature01484 ↗
8. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2005 · 95 · 06300410.1103/physrevlett.95.063004 ↗
9. Phys. Rev. A · 1977 · 16 · 187710.1103/physreva.16.1877 ↗
10. T. W. Kornack, Ph.D. thesis, Princeton University, 2005.
11. Phys. Rev. A · 1989 · 40 · 495910.1103/physreva.40.4959 ↗
12. Sci. Rep. · 2017 · 7 · 677610.1038/s41598-017-06434-2 ↗
13. E. D. Babcock, Ph.D. thesis, The University of Wisconsin-Madison, 2005.
14. Rev. Mod. Phys. · 1997 · 69 · 62910.1103/revmodphys.69.629 ↗
15. 2010
16. Phys. Rev. · 1959 · 115 · 85010.1103/physrev.115.850 ↗
17. 2017 · S4G.5
18. 1977
19. Optik · 2017 · 138 · 34110.1016/j.ijleo.2017.03.043 ↗
20. Phys. Rev. A · 2013 · 88 · 06341310.1103/physreva.88.063413 ↗
21. IEEE Photonics J. · 2017 · 9 · 530020910.1109/jphot.2017.2743013 ↗
22. AIP Adv. · 2020 · 10 · 06530310.1063/5.0007009 ↗
23. E. J. Eklund, Ph.D. thesis, University of California, Irvine, 2008.
24. Rev. Phys. Appl. · 1970 · 5 · 9510.1051/rphysap:019700050109500 ↗
25. S. J. Seltzer, Ph.D. thesis, Princeton University, 2008.