UAV formation control based on distributed Kalman model predictive control algorithm
Source abstract
Abstract
To address the perturbation of formation of multiple unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) subject to external disturbances, an algorithm of distributed Kalman model predictive control is proposed in this paper to improve the accuracy of maintaining a formation in flight. A UAV two-order discrete-time system model was built before devising a Kalman prediction model based on the standard prediction model. The desired formation configuration and neighbor Kalman optimal state estimation were conducted to determine the reference state of UAVs. While taking into account the formation tracking error and input stability, a logarithmic barrier function was introduced in the design of the overall cost function to ensure flight safety. Meanwhile, information was exchanged with neighbors with the directed and time-invariant communication topological structure. With the Lyapunov stability theorem, sufficient conditions were defined for the asymptotic stability of the formation system. Simulation results revealed that the algorithm could effectively suppress the perturbation in the formation of UAVs arising from external disturbances, allowing the formation to cope with the conflicts between individual UAVs.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Distributed Control Multi-Agent Systems · UAV Applications and Optimization · Robotic Path Planning Algorithms
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
College of Weaponry Engineering, Naval University of Engineering 1 , Wuhan 430000, China
32272 Unit, People’s Liberation Army of China 2 , Lanzhou 730000, China
References (34)
Show source-provided references
1. Prog. Aerosp. · 2017 · 91 · 9910.1016/j.paerosci.2017.04.003 ↗
2. 2017 · 573
3. 2018 · 514
4. Mobile Networks Appl. · 2018 · 23 · 169310.1007/s11036-018-1065-4 ↗
5. AIP Adv. · 2022 · 12 · 02500910.1063/5.0083674 ↗
6. Remote Sens. · 2020 · 12 · 64010.3390/rs12040640 ↗
7. Reinforcement learning for autonomous morphing control and cooperative operations of UAV cluster
8. J. Intell. Rob. Syst. · 2016 · 84 · 41510.1007/s10846-015-0318-8 ↗
9. Control Eng. Pract. · 2022 · 121 · 10505410.1016/j.conengprac.2021.105054 ↗
10. J. Intell. Rob. Syst. · 2016 · 84 · 39710.1007/s10846-015-0300-5 ↗
11. Aerosp. Sci. Technol. · 2018 · 77 · 73310.1016/j.ast.2018.04.002 ↗
12. Asian J. Control · 202210.1002/asjc.2806 ↗
13. Ocean Eng. · 2021 · 233 · 10915810.1016/j.oceaneng.2021.109158 ↗
14. Adv. Guid., Navig. Control · 2022 · 644 · 302910.1007/978-981-15-8155-7_253 ↗
15. Trans. Indian Natl. Acad. Eng. · 2022 · 7 · 32510.1007/s41403-021-00305-z ↗
16. Trans. Inst. Meas. Control · 2022 · 44 · 95210.1177/01423312211043012 ↗
17. Int. J. Robust Nonlinear Control · 2022 · 32 · 28610.1002/rnc.5823 ↗
18. Adv. Guid., Navig. Control · 2021 · 644 · 90510.1007/978-981-15-8155-7_76 ↗
19. J. Aerosp. Eng. · 2022 · 35 · 0402110410.1061/(asce)as.1943-5525.0001347 ↗
20. Research on collision avoidance between UAV flocks using behavior-based approach
21. Intell. Serv. Rob. · 2018 · 11 · 12710.1007/s11370-017-0240-y ↗
22. Math. Probl. Eng. · 2014 · 2014 · 20575910.1155/2014/205759 ↗
23. Adv. Guid., Navig. Control · 2022 · 644 · 132110.1007/978-981-15-8155-7_110 ↗
24. Aerosp. Syst. · 2022 · 5 · 7510.1007/s42401-021-00119-5 ↗
25. ISA Trans. · 2022 · 28 · 110.1016/j.isatra.2022.03.022 ↗
26. Electr. Eng. Syst. Sci. · 202210.48550/arXiv.2201.10399 ↗
27. Comput. Sci. · 202210.48550/arXiv.2201.09285 ↗
28. Asian J. Control · 2022 · 24 · 127310.1002/asjc.2521 ↗
29. IEEE Trans. Syst., Man, Cybern.: Syst. · 2019 · 51 · 519810.1109/TSMC.2019.2946127 ↗
30. Ocean Eng. · 2018 · 160 · 16810.1016/j.oceaneng.2018.04.026 ↗
31. Adv. Guid., Navig. Control · 2022 · 644 · 112310.1007/978-981-15-8155-7_94 ↗
32. 2021 · 9212
33. 2019 · 22
34. Int. J. Control · 2022 · 95 · 52610.1080/00207179.2020.1800101 ↗