journal article·2021-11-01Open access

A simplified methodology for the modeling of interfaces of elementary metals

Yoyo Hinuma, Ichigaku Takigawa, Masanori Kohyama, Shingo Tanaka

AIP Advances· Volume 11· Issue 11

Abstract

Automated generation of reasonable atomic-level interface models, for example, at a grain boundary, is generally computationally intensive partly because of the three degrees of freedom in a rigid-body translation (RBT) of one side of the interface against the other. We propose an algorithm to obtain reasonable interface models using as few first-principles calculations as possible. The valence charge densities of two surface slabs constituting the interface are calculated using first-principles calculations. The surface charge densities are filtered with an exponential function using a parameter λ to obtain the reaction front. Models where the overlap of filtered charge densities between the two slabs takes a local maximum are adopted as initial models with desirable RBTs, which are then relaxed using first-principles calculations to obtain a reasonable interface model. The proposed algorithm successfully generated reasonable initial models for three out of three orientations in 75% of homointerfaces of body-centered cubic, face-centered cubic, and hexagonal close-packed non-magnetic elementary metals. For the Al {001} Σ5 twist grain boundary, the present algorithm also reproduced γ-surface features of RBTs showing correct displacement shift complete lattice periodicity. Further modifications and improvements to this method are expected to accelerate automated interface model generation from a previously unexplored approach.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Machine Learning in Materials Science · Advanced Chemical Physics Studies · X-ray Diffraction in Crystallography

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (31)

Show source-provided references
1. J. Electron Microsc. · 2011 · 60 · S17310.1093/jmicro/dfr049 ↗
2. Philos. Mag. · 1968 · 18 · 77310.1080/14786436808227500 ↗
3. Phys. Rev. B · 2015 · 92 · 06410710.1103/physrevb.92.064107 ↗
4. Modell. Simul. Mater. Sci. Eng. · 2012 · 21 · 01500910.1088/0965-0393/21/1/015009 ↗
5. Acta Mater. · 2013 · 61 · 34110.1016/j.actamat.2012.09.066 ↗
6. Comput. Mater. Sci. · 2019 · 159 · 35710.1016/j.commatsci.2018.12.013 ↗
7. J. Mater. Sci. Lett. · 1994 · 13 · 4610.1007/bf02352916 ↗
8. Scr. Mater. · 2006 · 54 · 105910.1016/j.scriptamat.2005.11.060 ↗
9. Sci. Adv. · 2016 · 2 · e160074610.1126/sciadv.1600746 ↗
10. Acta Mater. · 2020 · 186 · 4010.1016/j.actamat.2019.12.030 ↗
11. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys., Part 1 · 2016 · 55 · 04550210.7567/jjap.55.045502 ↗
12. Nat. Mater. · 2010 · 9 · 41810.1038/nmat2712 ↗
13. Phys. Rev. B · 2014 · 90 · 03542410.1103/physrevb.90.035424 ↗
14. Sci. Bull. · 2019 · 64 · 30110.1016/j.scib.2019.02.009 ↗
15. Comput. Phys. Commun. · 2020 · 257 · 10751510.1016/j.cpc.2020.107515 ↗
16. Comput. Mater. Sci. · 2016 · 113 · 22110.1016/j.commatsci.2015.11.042 ↗
17. Phys. Rev. Mater. · 2018 · 2 · 12460310.1103/physrevmaterials.2.124603 ↗
18. Mater. Trans. · 2020 · 61 · 7810.2320/matertrans.mt-m2019215 ↗
19. Phys. Rev. B · 1994 · 50 · 1795310.1103/physrevb.50.17953 ↗
20. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2008 · 100 · 13640610.1103/physrevlett.100.136406 ↗
21. Phys. Rev. B · 1996 · 54 · 1116910.1103/physrevb.54.11169 ↗
22. Phys. Rev. B · 1999 · 59 · 175810.1103/physrevb.59.1758 ↗
23. J. Phys. Chem. C · 2020 · 124 · 2762110.1021/acs.jpcc.0c10010 ↗
24. J. Mach. Learn. Res. · 2011 · 12 · 2825
25. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter · 2019 · 31 · 09500110.1088/1361-648x/aaf7f2 ↗
26. Science · 1982 · 218 · 74710.1126/science.218.4574.747 ↗
27. J. Mol. Struct.: THEOCHEM · 1989 · 200 · 30110.1016/0166-1280(89)85062-6 ↗
28. Int. J. Plast. · 2016 · 86 · 9310.1016/j.ijplas.2016.08.003 ↗
29. J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2012 · 134 · 609610.1021/ja300868e ↗
30. J. Phys. Chem. C · 2019 · 123 · 1893910.1021/acs.jpcc.9b03335 ↗
31. J. Appl. Crystallogr. · 2011 · 44 · 127210.1107/s0021889811038970 ↗