journal article·2020-01-01Open access

Suppression and saturation of error field-driven tearing mode for different magnetic shears in rotating plasmas

Bang-Feng Zhang, Xian-Qu Wang

AIP Advances· Volume 10· Issue 1

Abstract

Effects of the equilibrium plasma flow on the error field-driven tearing mode are investigated in a two-dimensional resistive magnetohydrodynamics model. It is found that nonlinear suppression of the tearing mode is dominated by the interaction between the magnetic island and the error field rather than the local flow shear on rational surfaces. For a small magnetic shear case, a modest rigid flow can counteract the driving effect of the error field on the mode in the early nonlinear growth stage and transform the error field-driven mode to a general tearing mode. For a large magnetic shear case, after a fast linear growth, the tearing mode will enter a saturated process quickly before the locked mode occurs, and the mode saturation level is reduced due to the magnetic island and error field pushing each other. The threshold flow strength and its scaling analysis for the saturated modes are also given in this paper.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Magnetic confinement fusion research · Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics · Solar and Space Plasma Dynamics

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Institute of Fusion Science, School of Physical Science and Technology, Southwest Jiaotong University , Chengdu, Sichuan 610031, China

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China

References (30)

Show source-provided references
1. Nucl. Fusion · 2007 · 47 · S12810.1088/0029-5515/47/6/s03 ↗
2. Phys. Fluids B · 1992 · 4 · 209810.1063/1.860017 ↗
3. Nucl. Fusion · 2007 · 47 · S110.1088/0029-5515/47/6/S01 ↗
4. Europhys. Lett. · 2010 · 90 · 5500110.1209/0295-5075/90/55001 ↗
5. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1995 · 75 · 441710.1103/physrevlett.75.4417 ↗
6. Phys. Fluids B · 1990 · 2 · 49510.1063/1.859339 ↗
7. Phys. Fluids B · 1991 · 3 · 136410.1063/1.859701 ↗
8. Phys. Fluids B · 1993 · 5 · 427310.1063/1.860595 ↗
9. Phys. Plasmas · 1997 · 4 · 74810.1063/1.872182 ↗
10. Phys. Fluids B · 1991 · 3 · 64410.1063/1.859863 ↗
11. Nucl. Fusion · 1999 · 39 · 210710.1088/0029-5515/39/11y/361 ↗
12. Nucl. Fusion · 2008 · 48 · 02400710.1088/0029-5515/48/2/024007 ↗
13. Phys. Plasmas · 2013 · 20 · 06210510.1063/1.4811391 ↗
14. Nucl. Fusion · 2012 · 52 · 08301110.1088/0029-5515/52/8/083011 ↗
15. Europhys. Lett. · 2018 · 121 · 4500110.1209/0295-5075/121/45001 ↗
16. Phys. Fluids B · 1993 · 5 · 37610.1063/1.860523 ↗
17. Phys. Plasmas · 2010 · 17 · 05611010.1063/1.3333538 ↗
18. Nucl. Fusion · 1993 · 33 · 104910.1088/0029-5515/33/7/i08 ↗
19. Nucl. Fusion · 2005 · 45 · 52410.1088/0029-5515/45/6/015 ↗
20. Phys. Plasmas · 2007 · 14 · 01210110.1063/1.2424427 ↗
21. Nucl. Fusion · 2011 · 51 · 12300510.1088/0029-5515/51/12/123005 ↗
22. Phys. Plasmas · 2011 · 18 · 05070110.1063/1.3586258 ↗
23. Phys. Plasmas · 2013 · 20 · 02211410.1063/1.4793445 ↗
24. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2007 · 99 · 18500410.1103/physrevlett.99.185004 ↗
25. Phys. Scr. · 1982 · T2B · 52510.1088/0031-8949/1982/t2b/034 ↗
26. Phys. Plasmas · 2009 · 16 · 12211310.1063/1.3276534 ↗
27. Phys. Lett. A · 2016 · 380 · 197610.1016/j.physleta.2016.04.018 ↗
28. Phys. Lett. A · 1998 · 249 · 8710.1016/s0375-9601(98)00578-7 ↗
29. Phys. Plasmas · 2002 · 9 · 390610.1063/1.1499495 ↗
30. Nucl. Fusion · 2018 · 58 · 05400310.1088/1741-4326/aab2fb ↗