Characterization method of the layer thickness of surface residual stress based on instrumented indentation testing
Source abstract
Abstract
Based on dimensional analysis and finite element analysis (FEA), a test method was developed to determine the layer thickness of the surface residual stress using instrumented indentation testing. The relative loading curvatures of the stressed and stress-free P-h curves were obtained from the FEA results. The platform region of the curve of the relative loading curvature versus the indentation depth was used to estimate the residual stress, and the residual stress layer thickness was obtained by considering the turning point of the curve. According to the error analysis results, the proposed method is valid for estimating the residual stress layer thickness by carefully considering the material properties. The proposed method was reduced to the instrumented indentation testing method to determine the uniform residual stress when the indentation depth was far smaller than the layer thickness.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Metal and Thin Film Mechanics · Welding Techniques and Residual Stresses · Advanced Surface Polishing Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Mechanics and Engineering Science, Zhengzhou University 1 , Zhengzhou, Henan 450001, China
Henan Key Engineering Laboratory for Anti-Fatigue Manufacturing Technology 2 , Zhengzhou, Henan 450001, China
School of Mechanical Engineering, Zhengzhou University 3 , Zhengzhou, Henan 450001, China
Funding
Postdoctoral Research Grant in Henan Province · National Natural Science Foundation of China
References (27)
Show source-provided references
1. 2002
2. Surf Eng · 2018 · 34 · 93810.1080/02670844.2017.1391939 ↗
3. J Power Energ · 2012 · 6 · 6310.1299/jpes.6.63 ↗
4. Appl Mech Rev · 2015 · 67 · 01080110.1115/1.4028160 ↗
5. Mater Design · 2012 · 35 · 57210.1016/j.matdes.2011.08.022 ↗
6. Eng Fract Mech · 2018 · 193 · 1710.1016/j.engfracmech.2018.02.016 ↗
7. Measurement · 2017 · 106 · 15210.1016/j.measurement.2017.04.043 ↗
8. Thin-Wall Struct · 2016 · 104 · 12610.1016/j.tws.2016.03.017 ↗
9. J Mater Sci · 2017 · 52 · 1283410.1007/s10853-017-1321-1 ↗
10. J Mater Process Tech · 2004 · 155-156 · 117110.1016/j.jmatprotec.2004.04.393 ↗
11. NDT & E Int · 2004 · 37 · 910.1016/s0963-8695(03)00046-x ↗
12. Mater Sci Eng A · 2004 · 382 · 25710.1016/j.msea.2004.05.020 ↗
13. J Mater Sci · 2015 · 50 · 775210.1007/s10853-015-9345-x ↗
14. J Mater Res · 1996 · 11 · 75210.1557/jmr.1996.0091 ↗
15. J Mater Res · 1996 · 11 · 76010.1557/jmr.1996.0092 ↗
16. Acta Mater · 1998 · 46 · 575510.1016/s1359-6454(98)00226-2 ↗
17. Scripta Mater · 2003 · 49 · 45910.1016/s1359-6462(03)00290-2 ↗
18. Acta Mater · 2001 · 49 · 217910.1016/s1359-6454(01)00122-7 ↗
19. Acta Mater · 2001 · 49 · 219310.1016/s1359-6454(01)00123-9 ↗
20. Mater Sci Eng A · 2014 · 614 · 26410.1016/j.msea.2014.07.041 ↗
21. Metall Mater Trans A · 2002 · 33 · 177510.1007/s11661-002-0186-2 ↗
22. Int J Solids Struct · 1999 · 36 · 123110.1016/s0020-7683(97)00349-1 ↗
23. Analysis of nanoindentation load-displacement loading curves10.1557/jmr.1996.0250 ↗
24. Scaling, self-similarity, and intermediate asymptotics: Dimensional analysis and intermediate asymptotics
25. J Mater Res · 2009 · 24 · 104510.1557/jmr.2009.0108 ↗
26. 2014
27. J Mater Res · 2004 · 19 · 7310.1557/jmr.2004.19.1.73 ↗