Saturation of VCMA in out-of-plane magnetized CoFeB/MgO/CoFeB magnetic tunnel junctions
Source abstract
Abstract
Voltage controlled magnetic anisotropy (VCMA) currently attracts considerable attention as a novel method to control and manipulate magnetic moments in high-speed and low-power spintronic applications based on magnetic tunnel junctions (MTJs). In our experiments, we use ferromagnetic resonance (FMR) to study and quantify VCMA in out-of-plane magnetized CoFeB/MgO/CoFeB MTJ pillars. FMR is excited by applying a microwave current and detected via a small rectified voltage which develops across MTJ at resonance. The VCMA effective field can be extracted from the measured resonance field and was found to vary as a function of electrical bias applied to MTJ. At low applied biases, we observe a linear shift of the VCMA field as a function of the applied voltage which is consistent with the VCMA picture based on the bias-induced electron migration across the MgO/CoFeB interface. At higher biases, both positive and negative, we observe a deviation from the linear behavior which may indicate a saturation of the VCMA effect. These results are important for the design of MTJ-based applications.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Magnetic properties of thin films · ZnO doping and properties · Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Physics Department, University of Texas at Austin 1 , Austin, TX 78712, USA
Department of Physics, University of Arizona 2 , Tucson, AZ 85721, USA
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Minnesota 3 , Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA
Funding
SRC | Microelectronics Advanced Research Corporation
References (23)
Show source-provided references
1. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. · 1996 · 159 · L110.1016/0304-8853(96)00062-5 ↗
2. Phys. Rev. B · 1996 · 54 · 935310.1103/physrevb.54.9353 ↗
3. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1998 · 80 · 428110.1103/physrevlett.80.4281 ↗
4. Nat. Nanotechnol. · 2015 · 10 · 20910.1038/nnano.2015.22 ↗
5. Nat. Mater. · 2011 · 11 · 6410.1038/nmat3171 ↗
6. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2012 · 101 · 12240310.1063/1.4753816 ↗
7. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2014 · 105 · 05241510.1063/1.4892824 ↗
8. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2012 · 108 · 19720310.1103/physrevlett.108.266805 ↗
9. Sci. Rep. · 2017 · 7 · 4251110.1038/srep42511 ↗
10. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2016 · 109 · 03240110.1063/1.4958732 ↗
11. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2009 · 102 · 18720110.1103/PhysRevLett.102.187201 ↗
12. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2009 · 102 · 24720310.1103/physrevlett.102.247203 ↗
13. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2008 · 101 · 13720110.1103/PhysRevLett.101.137201 ↗
14. Nature · 2005 · 438 · 33910.1038/nature04207 ↗
15. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2006 · 96 · 22760110.1103/physrevlett.96.227601 ↗
16. J. Appl. Phys. · 2011 · 109 · 07C91210.1063/1.3553942 ↗
17. J. of Appl. Phys. · 2015 · 117 · 17C50710.1063/1.4913643 ↗
18. J. Appl. Phys. · 2012 · 111 · 07C50110.1063/1.3670002 ↗
19. Sci. Rep. · 2014 · 4 · 410510.1038/srep04105 ↗
20. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. · 2016 · 414 · 12610.1016/j.jmmm.2016.04.027 ↗
21. Nat. Mater. · 2014 · 14 · 17410.1038/nmat4134 ↗
22. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2013 · 103 · 6240210.1063/1.4817268 ↗
23. Phys. Rev. B · 2017 · 96 · 01443510.1103/physrevd.96.054008 ↗