journal article·2018-08-01Open access

Limits of emission quantum yield determination

Bart van Dam, Benjamin Bruhn, Gejza Dohnal, Kateřina Dohnalová

AIP Advances· Volume 8· Issue 8

Abstract

The development of new fluorescent molecules and dyes requires precise determination of their emission efficiency, which ultimately defines the potential of the developed materials. For this, the photoluminescence quantum yield (QY) is commonly used, given by the ratio of the number of emitted and absorbed photons, where the latter can be determined by subtraction of the transmitted signal by the sample and by a blank reference. In this work, we show that when the measurement uncertainty is larger than 10% of the absorptance of the sample, the QY distribution function becomes skewed, which can result in underestimated QY values by more than 200%. We demonstrate this effect in great detail by simulation of the QY methodology that implements an integrating sphere, which is widely used commercially and for research. Based on our simulations, we show that this effect arises from the non-linear propagation of the measurement uncertainties. The observed effect applies to the measurement of any variable defined as Z = X/Y, with Y = U − V, where X, U and V are random, normally distributed parameters. For this general case, we derive the analytical expression and quantify the range in which the effect can be avoided.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Photochemistry and Electron Transfer Studies · Analytical Chemistry and Sensors · Quantum Dots Synthesis And Properties

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

University of Amsterdam, Institute of Physics 1 , Science Park 904, 1098 XH Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Czech Technical University in Prague, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering 2 , Karlovo náměstí 13, 121 35 Prague 2, Czech Republic

Funding

Center of Advanced Aerospace Technology, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Czech Technical University in Prague · ESIF, EU Operational Programme Research, Development and Education · Stichting voor Fundamenteel Onderzoek der Materie · Universiteit van Amsterdam · Stichting voor de Technische Wetenschappen

References (18)

Show source-provided references
1. Nano Letters · 2012 · 12 · 33710.1021/nl2036194 ↗
2. ACS Nano · 2012 · 6 · 738910.1021/nn302524k ↗
3. Advanced Materials · 2015 · 27 · 74610.1002/adma.201403552 ↗
4. Nature Nanotechnology · 2011 · 6 · 71010.1038/nnano.2011.167 ↗
5. Nature Communications · 2014 · 5 · 466510.1038/ncomms5665 ↗
6. Advanced Optical Materials · 2017 · 5 · 160070910.1002/adom.201600709 ↗
7. Applied Physics Letters · 2014 · 105 · 24310710.1063/1.4904472 ↗
8. Journal of Applied Physics · 2015 · 117 · 14430610.1063/1.4917388 ↗
9. Nature Protocols · 2013 · 8 · 153510.1038/nprot.2013.087 ↗
10. Nanoscience Methods · 2014 · 3 · 1110.1080/21642311.2014.884288 ↗
11. Review of Scientific Instruments · 2007 · 78 · 200510.1063/1.2768926 ↗
12. Laser and Photonics Reviews · 2012 · 6 · 80210.1002/lpor.201200077 ↗
13. Applied Spectroscopy · 2015 · 69 · 74910.1366/14-07679 ↗
14. Chemical Physics Letters · 1995 · 241 · 8910.1016/0009-2614(95)00584-q ↗
15. Advanced Materials · 1997 · 9 · 23010.1002/adma.19970090308 ↗
16. Journal of Luminescence · 2006 · 121 · 32710.1016/j.jlumin.2006.08.068 ↗
17. Metodoloski Zvezki · 2004 · 1 · 99
18. Proc. SPIE · 2015 · 9562 · 95620O10.1117/12.2191105 ↗