journal article·2016-05-01Open access

Detection of a magnetic bead by hybrid nanodevices using scanning gate microscopy

H. Corte-León, P. Krzysteczko, F. Marchi, J.-F. Motte, A. Manzin, H. W. Schumacher, V. Antonov, O. Kazakova

AIP Advances· Volume 6· Issue 5

Abstract

Hybrid ferromagnetic(Py)/non-magnetic metal(Au) junctions with a width of 400 nm are studied by magnetotransport measurements, magnetic scanning gate microscopy (SGM) with a magnetic bead (MB) attached to the probe, and micromagnetic simulations. In the transverse geometry, the devices demonstrate a characteristic magnetoresistive behavior that depends on the direction of the in plane magnetic field, with minimum/maximum variation when the field is applied parallel/perpendicular to the Py wire. The SGM is performed with a NdFeB bead of 1.6 μm diameter attached to the scanning probe. Our results demonstrate that the hybrid junction can be used to detect this type of MB. A rough approximation of the sensing volume of the junction has the shape of elliptical cylinder with the volume of ∼1.51 μm3. Micromagnetic simulations coupled to a magnetotransport model including anisotropic magnetoresistance and planar Hall effects are in good agreement with the experimental findings, enabling the interpretation of the SGM images.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Magnetic properties of thin films · Force Microscopy Techniques and Applications · Surface and Thin Film Phenomena

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

National Physical Laboratory 1 , Teddington, TW11 0LW, United Kingdom

Royal Holloway University of London 2 , Egham, TW20 0EX, United Kingdom

Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt 3 , Braunschweig, D-38116, Germany

Univ. Grenoble Alpes 4 , Inst. NEEL, Grenoble, F-38042, France

Istituto Nazionale di Ricerca Metrologica 5 , Torino, I-10135, Italy

Funding

European Commission

References (33)

Show source-provided references
1. Adv. Mater. · 2010 · 22 · 270610.1002/adma.201000146 ↗
2. J. Appl. Phys. · 2015 · 117 · 17B31710.1063/1.4917191 ↗
3. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. · 2005 · 293 · 67710.1016/j.jmmm.2005.02.071 ↗
4. J. Appl. Phys. · 2015 · 117 · 17E31310.1063/1.4914365 ↗
5. Sensors Actuators, A Phys. · 2010 · 157 · 4210.1016/j.sna.2009.11.033 ↗
6. Phys. Rev. B · 2012 · 85 · 17444010.1103/PhysRevB.85.174440 ↗
7. Nanotechnology · 2009 · 20 · 38550110.1088/0957-4484/20/38/385501 ↗
8. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2008 · 93 · 20350210.1063/1.3030984 ↗
9. J. Appl. Phys. · 2010 · 107 · 09B30110.1063/1.3352579 ↗
10. Sci. Rep. · 2014 · 4 · 604510.1038/srep06045 ↗
11. J. Appl. Phys. · 2014 · 115 · 18450510.1063/1.4876256 ↗
12. J. Magn. · 2014 · 19 · 15110.4283/JMAG.2014.19.2.151 ↗
13. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. · 2015 · 381 · 48110.1016/j.jmmm.2014.10.172 ↗
14. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. · 2009 · 187 · 01205610.1088/1742-6596/187/1/012056 ↗
15. J. Magn. · 2014 · 19 · 1010.4283/JMAG.2014.19.1.010 ↗
16. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 1995 · 66 · 275110.1063/1.113697 ↗
17. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2010 · 97 · 510.1063/1.3460290 ↗
18. J. Appl. Phys. · 2008 · 103 · 5
19. IEEE Trans. Nanotechnol. · 2013 · 12 · 66810.1109/TNANO.2013.2266733 ↗
20. J. Appl. Phys. · 2006 · 99 · 08B71010.1063/1.2177205 ↗
21. Sensors Actuators A Phys. · 2012 · 174 · 110.1016/j.sna.2011.10.031 ↗
22. J. Appl. Phys. · 2011 · 109 · 06451110.1063/1.3561364 ↗
23. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 1 · 201510.1016/j.jmmm.2015.07.116 ↗
24. J. Appl. Phys. · 2007 · 102 · 01450710.1063/1.2752144 ↗
25. J. Appl. Phys. · 2014 · 115 · 17D12210.1063/1.4862379 ↗
26. IEEE Trans. Magn. · 2012 · 48 · 278910.1109/TMAG.2012.2195648 ↗
27. J. Appl. Phys. · 2010 · 108 · 09391710.1063/1.3503873 ↗
28. IEEE Trans. Magn. · 1975 · MAG-11 · 101810.1109/TMAG.1975.1058782 ↗
29. IEEE Trans. Magn. · 1990 · 26 · 31110.1109/20.50560 ↗
30. IEEE Trans. Magn. · 2014 · 50 · 110.1109/TMAG.2013.2285937 ↗
31. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2009 · 94 · 04251110.1063/1.3077174 ↗
32. Sensors Actuators A Phys. · 2003 · 106 · 31410.1016/S0924-4247(03)00192-4 ↗
33. 1973