Compton sequence estimation based on the deep learning method
Source abstract
Abstract
Determining the sequence of Compton scattering and photoelectric absorption events for a Compton camera system through timing information is difficult due to the finite timing resolution of radiation detectors. The conventional method compares the energies of two sequential events and determines the order of these events. The deep learning method can estimate the sequence of Compton scattering followed by the photoelectric effect better than the conventional method because it determines the sequence based on both energy and positional information of the radiation interaction. The initial information of the deep learning models is the position and energy information, and the input data are then processed in the nodes of the hidden layers. In this study, the performance of deep learning models for Compton sequence estimation and the effect of position information on these methods were investigated. The accuracies of the deep learning method and the conventional comparison method were compared. The weights connecting each node were analyzed to evaluate the effects of position and energy information to determine the Compton sequence.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications · Radiation Detection and Scintillator Technologies · Nuclear Physics and Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Health Science Research Center, Korea University 1 , Seoul 02841, Republic of Korea
School of Health and Environmental Science, Korea University 2 , Seoul 02841, Republic of Korea
Trans-disciplinary Major in Learning Health Systems, Graduate School, Korea University 3 , Seoul 02841, Republic of Korea
Funding
National Research Foundation · Korea Institute of Energy Technology Evaluation and Planning
References (12)
Show source-provided references
1. IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. · 2020 · 67 · 251110.1109/tns.2020.3037896 ↗
2. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A · 2018 · 912 · 110.1016/j.nima.2017.09.048 ↗
3. IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. · 2021 · 68 · 227910.1109/tns.2021.3086799 ↗
4. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A · 2018 · 895 · 7410.1016/j.nima.2018.03.076 ↗
5. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A · 2020 · 954 · 16149910.1016/j.nima.2018.10.177 ↗
6. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A · 2021 · 990 · 16499810.1016/j.nima.2020.164998 ↗
7. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A · 2021 · 1014 · 16570210.1016/j.nima.2021.165702 ↗
8. Nucl. Eng. Technol. · 2021 · 53 · 408010.1016/j.net.2021.06.027 ↗
9. 4π Compton imaging using a 3-D position-sensitive CdZnTe detector via weighted list-mode maximum likelihood
10. IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. · 2016 · 63 · 25910.1109/tns.2015.2514120 ↗
11. Image artifacts resulting from gamma-ray tracking algorithms used with Compton imagers
12. Nature · 2015 · 521 · 43610.1038/nature14539 ↗