journal article·2021-07-01Open access

Electrical admittance-based evaluation of piezoelectric active sensor condition using k-nearest neighbors and least-squares regression

Xie Jiang, Xin Zhang, Yuxiang Zhang

AIP Advances· Volume 11· Issue 7

Abstract

In the electromechanical impedance-based health monitoring of structures, partial failure of piezoelectric lead zirconate titanate will result in signal changes, which may cause misjudgment of the structure state. Therefore, this paper proposes an evaluation method of the sensor condition based on k-nearest neighbors (kNNs) and least-squares regression (LSR) to make monitoring more reliable. After the analysis of the signal characteristics of three structural changes and four sensor faults, the principal components (PCs) of three indices are extracted by principal component analysis. Next, the kNN classifier is trained with the data represented by PCs and then tested by tenfold cross-validation. To determine the degree of sensor faults, LSR is used to fit the damage degree laws with multivariate nonlinear equations. The results show that the kNN model trained with three PCs has higher classification accuracy than the one trained with two PCs. The accuracy of the former reaches 100%. The R2 values of damage degree regressions of four sensor faults are all greater than 0.85, and the p-values are far less than 0.05, which denotes the effectiveness of the regression in the prediction of damage degree. This method has great application potential in evaluating sensor conditions accurately and quickly.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation · Structural Health Monitoring Techniques · Non-Destructive Testing Techniques

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

PLA Rocket Force University of Engineering 1 , Xi’an 710025, China

Northwest Institute of Nuclear Technology 2 , Xi’an 710024, China

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China

References (38)

Show source-provided references
1. Quantitative electromechanical impedance method for nondestructive testing based on a piezoelectric bimorph cantilever10.1088/0964-1726/24/6/065038 ↗
2. Structural health monitoring with piezoelectric active sensors10.1115/1.1365123 ↗
3. Electromechanical impedance modeling of PZT transducers for health monitoring of cylindrical shell structures10.1088/0964-1726/17/01/015005 ↗
4. Dual use of PZT patches as sensors in global dynamic and local electromechanical impedance techniques for structural health monitoring10.1177/1045389x11414219 ↗
5. One-dimensional modelling of piezo-structure interaction for debonding configuration using electro-mechanical impedance (EMI) techniques
6. The influence of bonding defects on the electric impedance of a piezoelectric embedded element10.1088/0022-3727/29/12/006 ↗
7. Piezoelectric wafer embedded active sensors for aging aircraft structural health monitoring10.1177/147592170200100104 ↗
8. Closed-loop based detection of debonding of piezoelectric actuator patches in controlled beams10.1016/S0020-7683(03)00080-5 ↗
9. Comparison of metrics to monitor and compensate for piezoceramic debonding in structural health monitoring10.1177/1475921712467490 ↗
10. Sensor self-diagnosis using a modified impedance model for active sensing-based structural health monitoring10.1177/1475921708094792 ↗
11. Diagnosis and validation of damaged piezoelectric sensor in electromechanical impedance technique10.1177/1045389x16657427 ↗
12. Sensor fault diagnosis for impedance monitoring using a piezoelectric-based smart interface technique10.3390/s20020510 ↗
13. Piezoelectric active-sensor diagnostics and validation using instantaneous baseline data10.1109/jsen.2009.2018351 ↗
14. EMI based monitoring of early-age characteristics of concrete and comparison of serial/parallel multi-sensing technique10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.10.079 ↗
15. 2014
16. Detailed models of piezoceramic actuation of beams10.1177/1045389X9000100102 ↗
17. A real-time electromechanical impedance-based active monitoring for composite patch bonded repair structure10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.01.035 ↗
18. Coupled electro-mechanical analysis of adaptive material systems-determination of the actuator power consumption and system energy transfer10.1177/1045389x9700800406 ↗
19. Overview of piezoelectric impedance-based health monitoring and path forward10.1177/05831024030356001 ↗
20. Debonding detection of solid rocket motor based on EMI technology10.4028/www.scientific.net/amr.538-541.2117 ↗
21. Damage evaluation of concrete column under impact load using a piezoelectric-based EMI technique10.3390/s18051591 ↗
22. Low frequency and boundary condition effects on impedance based damage identification10.1016/j.csndt.2014.05.001 ↗
23. Instantaneous monitoring the early age properties of cementitious materials using PZT-based electromechanical impedance (EMI) technique10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.07.164 ↗
24. Nearest neighbor pattern classification10.1109/TIT.1967.1053964 ↗
25. Fusing Gabor and LBP feature sets for KNN and SRC-based face recognition
26. A k-nearest neighbor text classification algorithm based on fuzzy integral
27. An improved KNN text classification algorithm based on clustering10.4304/jcp.4.3.230-237 ↗
28. 2020
29. Principal component analysis in linear systems: Controllability, observability, and model reduction10.1109/TAC.1981.1102568 ↗
30. Sensitivity analysis of k-fold cross validation in prediction error estimation10.1109/tpami.2009.187 ↗
31. 2017
32. An analysis of a least squares regression method for American option pricing10.1007/s007800200071 ↗
33. Linear statistical inference and its applications10.2307/1527895 ↗
34. A note on a general definition of the coefficient of determination10.1093/biomet/78.3.691 ↗
35. Large-scale inference: Empirical bayes methods for estimation, testing, and prediction10.1080/09332480.2012.726568 ↗
36. Statistical tests, P values, confidence intervals, and power: A guide to misinterpretations10.1007/s10654-016-0149-3 ↗
37. The reproducibility of research and the misinterpretation of p-values10.1098/rsos.171085 ↗
38. Alternatives to P value: Confidence interval and effect size10.4097/kjae.2016.69.6.555 ↗