journal article·2021-02-01Open access

Bubble characteristics and turbulent dissipation rate in horizontal bubbly pipe flow

Weiyang Zhao, Hang Wang, Ruidi Bai, Wangru Wei, Hongtao Wang

AIP Advances· Volume 11· Issue 2

Abstract

The energy dissipation rate is a crucial parameter for system control and turbulence modeling but is difficult to quantify in gas–liquid two-phase flows. Little relevant information is available, especially in horizontal pipe flows. Based on the consideration that the bubble characteristics in a stable bubbly flow are a reflection of flow turbulence, the bubble shape and bubble size spectrum are investigated in a 10-m-long horizontal rectangular pipe by means of high-speed imaging and graphic processing techniques. The bubble size spectra indicate a critical length scale, deemed to be the Hinze scale, and the spectral shape is related to turbulent fragmentation and, thus, enables calculation of the turbulence dissipation rate. After careful validation of the approach for estimating the turbulence dissipation rate, an empirical prediction equation is proposed based on the present tested flow conditions, reflecting the effects of both the pipe flow velocity and the gas flow rate. Such information is useful for the modeling of turbulent two-phase flows.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Fluid Dynamics and Mixing · Metallurgical Processes and Thermodynamics · Minerals Flotation and Separation Techniques

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

State Key Laboratory of Hydraulics and Mountain River Engineering, Sichuan University , Sichuan, China

Funding

Sichuan Science and Technology Program · National Natural Science Foundation of China

References (42)

Show source-provided references
1. 1981
2. Exp. Therm. Fluid Sci. · 2018 · 93 · 21010.1016/j.expthermflusci.2017.12.033 ↗
3. Math. Probl. Eng. · 2019 · 149057110.1155/2019/1490571 ↗
4. Adv. Mater. Sci. Eng. · 2020 · 201056810.1155/2020/2010568 ↗
5. Nucl. Eng. Des. · 2007 · 237 · 184810.1016/j.nucengdes.2007.02.018 ↗
6. Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer · 1993 · 36 · 106110.1016/s0017-9310(05)80290-x ↗
7. Int. J. Multiphase Flow · 2008 · 34 · 76710.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2008.01.007 ↗
8. Energy Procedia · 2015 · 71 · 33710.1016/j.egypro.2014.11.887 ↗
9. AIP Adv. · 2019 · 9 · 08502510.1063/1.5093219 ↗
10. Nat. Phys. · 2018 · 14 · 38610.1038/s41567-017-0018-3 ↗
11. Science · 2011 · 333 · 19210.1126/science.1203223 ↗
12. Can. J. Chem. Eng. · 2010 · 88 · 111410.1002/cjce.20383 ↗
13. Nucl. Eng. Des. · 2014 · 267 · 3410.1016/j.nucengdes.2013.11.073 ↗
14. 2003 · 2771
15. 1922
16. 2000
17. 1998
18. Int. J. Multiphase Flow · 2015 · 68 · 13510.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2014.09.005 ↗
19. J. Geophys. Res.: Oceans · 1993 · 98 · 1827710.1029/93jc01627 ↗
20. J. Phys. Oceanogr. · 2000 · 30 · 216310.1175/1520-0485(2000)030<2163:tcbbss>2.0.co;2 ↗
21. Nature · 2002 · 418 · 83910.1038/nature00967 ↗
22. Int. J. Multiphase Flow · 1975 · 2 · 5110.1016/0301-9322(75)90028-2 ↗
23. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. · 1979 · 9 · 6210.1109/tsmc.1979.4310076 ↗
24. Comput. Chem. Eng. · 2001 · 25 · 57110.1016/s0098-1354(01)00636-6 ↗
25. Exp. Therm. Fluid Sci. · 2017 · 85 · 24810.1016/j.expthermflusci.2017.03.009 ↗
26. Chem. Eng. Sci. · 2002 · 57 · 184910.1016/s0009-2509(02)00085-4 ↗
27. Trans. Inst. Chem. Eng. · 1976 · 54 · 167
28. Nat. Commun. · 2015 · 6 · 626810.1038/ncomms7268 ↗
29. Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR · 1941 · 31 · 235
30. AIChE J. · 1955 · 1 · 28910.1002/aic.690010303 ↗
31. 1953
32. J. Fluids Eng. · 1973 · 95 · 5310.1115/1.3446958 ↗
33. Nucl. Eng. Des. · 1994 · 148 · 43710.1016/0029-5493(94)90124-4 ↗
34. 1932
35. Chem. Eng. Sci. · 1977 · 32 · 19510.1016/0009-2509(77)80105-x ↗
36. 1982
37. Chem. Eng. Trans. · 1982 · 60 · 283
38. 1986
39. Chem. Eng. Sci. · 1992 · 47 · 326510.1016/0009-2509(92)85034-9 ↗
41. Int. J. Multiphase Flow · 2016 · 87 · 15610.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2016.07.007 ↗
42. AIChE J. · 1987 · 33 · 66310.1002/aic.690330414 ↗