Multi-shot damage on Mo/Si multilayer induced by nanosecond EUV radiation
Source abstract
Abstract
As a vital optical element working in the extreme ultraviolet (EUV) region, the damage mechanism on a Mo/Si multilayer has caught great attention. In this paper, using a nanosecond table-top EUV source, an S-on-1 EUV damage experiment was performed on a Mo/Si multilayer mirror with shot numbers S = 1, 2, 5, and 10. It was demonstrated that the multi-shot damage thresholds follow an inverse-power-law as a function of the pulse number. The incubation effect is explained based on the measured damage morphologies by an atomic force microscope. When the Mo/Si multilayer mirror was exposed to the EUV fluence above the single damage threshold, compaction of the layer structure and melting and resolidification processes are dominating the damage mechanism. It was also found that the crater depth and FWHM at high fluence are independent of the shot numbers, which is explained by the formation of the MoSi2 spacing layer.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Laser-Plasma Interactions and Diagnostics · Advanced Surface Polishing Techniques · Integrated Circuits and Semiconductor Failure Analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
MOE Key Laboratory of Advanced Micro-Structured Materials 1 , Shanghai 200092, China
Institute of Precision Optical Engineering, School of Physics Science and Engineering, Tongji University 2 , Shanghai 200092, China
Sino-German College of Applied Sciences, Tongji University 3 , 200092 Shanghai, China
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China · National Key Research and Development Program of China
References (27)
Show source-provided references
1. Nat. Photonics · 2007 · 1 · 33610.1038/nphoton.2007.76 ↗
2. Nat. Photonics · 2012 · 6 · 69910.1038/nphoton.2012.233 ↗
3. Light: Sci. Appl. · 2017 · 6 · e1708610.1038/lsa.2017.86 ↗
4. Light: Sci. Appl. · 2018 · 7 · 6410.1038/s41377-018-0065-2 ↗
5. Opt. Lett. · 1997 · 22 · 3410.1364/ol.22.000034 ↗
6. J. Appl. Phys. · 2006 · 99 · 05610810.1063/1.2179152 ↗
7. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2009 · 95 · 11110410.1063/1.3216845 ↗
8. Phys. Rev. B · 2012 · 86 · 02410310.1103/physrevb.86.024103 ↗
9. Opt. Express · 2018 · 26 · 1966510.1364/oe.26.019665 ↗
10. Rev. Sci. Instrum. · 2016 · 87 · 05180110.1063/1.4950723 ↗
11. Appl. Phys. A: Mater. Sci. Process. · 2013 · 110 · 17910.1007/s00339-012-7100-6 ↗
12. Opt. Lett. · 2004 · 29 · 62010.1364/ol.29.000620 ↗
13. Opt. Express · 2010 · 18 · 70010.1364/oe.18.000700 ↗
14. Opt. Express · 2011 · 19 · 19310.1364/oe.19.000193 ↗
15. Opt. Express · 2010 · 18 · 434610.1364/oe.18.004346 ↗
16. Appl. Phys. A: Mater. Sci. Process. · 2012 · 108 · 26310.1007/s00339-012-7037-9 ↗
17. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A · 2011 · 635 · S3010.1016/j.nima.2010.10.026 ↗
18. 2016
19. J. Appl. Phys. · 2013 · 113 · 20310610.1063/1.4807644 ↗
20. Rev. Sci. Instrum. · 2018 · 89 · 10310910.1063/1.5044752 ↗
21. J. Opt. Soc. Am. B · 1988 · 5 · 64810.1364/josab.5.000648 ↗
22. Appl. Phys. A: Mater. Sci. Process. · 2002 · 74 · 1910.1007/s003390100893 ↗
23. Appl. Surf. Sci. · 2000 · 154 · 55510.1016/s0169-4332(99)00474-2 ↗
24. Appl. Surf. Sci. · 2009 · 255 · 971710.1016/j.apsusc.2009.04.058 ↗
25. J. Appl. Phys. · 2008 · 103 · 08354910.1063/1.2907964 ↗
26. J. Synchrotron Radiat. · 2018 · 25 · 7710.1107/s1600577517017362 ↗
27. J. Appl. Phys. · 1995 · 78 · 522710.1063/1.359698 ↗