Sn tuned microstructure and phase-change characteristics of GeTe nanowires
Source abstract
Abstract
Sn-doped GeTe (SGT) nanowires (NWs) were investigated systematically for use in phase-change memory (PCM) applications. Composition and microstructure characterizations indicate that SGT with ∼3.0% Sn (SGT_3.0) NWs preserves the GeTe rhombohedral (R) structure, whereas SGT with a Sn content of ∼25.0% (SGT_25.0) NWs exhibits a cubic (C) structure. R–C structural conversion of SGT NWs is revealed with increasing Sn content. According to ab initio calculations, optimizing doping leads to a decrease in density of states near the Fermi level and reduces electrical conductivity, and thereby, SGT_3.0 is more applicable for PCM than SGT_25.0, which is attributed to Sn-induced structural change that brings about a diversity in the electrical properties. Experimentally, SGT_3.0 NWs have two significant threshold switchings and ideal high/low resistance ratio (∼105). Compared with undoped GeTe, SGT_3.0 NWs experience an increase in crystalline resistance, in agreement with our theoretical calculations, perfectly satisfying the requirement of low programming currents for PCM.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Phase-change materials and chalcogenides · Chalcogenide Semiconductor Thin Films · Perovskite Materials and Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
College of Electronic and Information Engineering, Changshu Institute of Technology 1 , Changshu 215500, China
Basic Experimental Teaching Center, Shanxi Normal University 2 , Xi’an 710062, China
Funding
the National Natural Science Foundation of China · the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
References (26)
Show source-provided references
1. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys., Part 1 · 2003 · 42 · 80910.1143/jjap.42.809 ↗
2. Nat. Mater. · 2005 · 4 · 26510.1038/nmat1359 ↗
3. J. Phys. Chem. C · 2007 · 111 · 242110.1021/jp0658804 ↗
4. J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2008 · 130 · 625210.1021/ja711481b ↗
5. Nat. Nanotechnol. · 2007 · 2 · 62610.1038/nnano.2007.291 ↗
6. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2012 · 100 · 06191010.1063/1.3683522 ↗
7. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces · 2016 · 8 · 2018510.1021/acsami.6b05071 ↗
8. J. Mater. Chem. C · 2017 · 5 · 359210.1039/c7tc00127d ↗
9. Acta Mater. · 2012 · 60 · 202110.1016/j.actamat.2011.12.034 ↗
10. J. Alloys Compd. · 2017 · 721 · 67410.1016/j.jallcom.2017.06.070 ↗
11. Phys. Rev. B · 2005 · 71 · 22410210.1103/physrevb.71.224102 ↗
12. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2014 · 105 · 12190210.1063/1.4894864 ↗
13. J. Mater. Chem. C · 2015 · 3 · 939310.1039/c5tc01081k ↗
14. Nano Lett. · 2011 · 11 · 114710.1021/nl104075v ↗
15. Thin Solid Films · 2005 · 478 · 4910.1016/j.tsf.2004.09.057 ↗
16. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1971 · 27 · 80810.1103/physrevlett.27.808 ↗
17. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2019 · 122 · 14570110.1103/physrevlett.122.145701 ↗
18. Appl. Surf. Sci. · 2018 · 452 · 13410.1016/j.apsusc.2018.04.246 ↗
19. Thin Solid Films · 2020 · 693 · 13770810.1016/j.tsf.2019.137708 ↗
20. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2018 · 120 · 18570110.1103/physrevlett.120.185701 ↗
21. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. · 2018 · 115 · 533210.1073/pnas.1802020115 ↗
22. Adv. Mater. · 2018 · 30 · 170594210.1002/adma.201705942 ↗
23. J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2018 · 140 · 267310.1021/jacs.7b13611 ↗
24. Energy Environ. Sci. · 2019 · 12 · 58910.1039/c8ee03162b ↗
25. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2013 · 102 · 06310410.1063/1.4790590 ↗
26. Nano Lett. · 2011 · 11 · 136410.1021/nl104537c ↗