journal article·2018-10-01Open access

Charge susceptibility and conductances of a double quantum dot

V. Talbo, M. Lavagna, T. Q. Duong, A. Crépieux

AIP Advances· Volume 8· Issue 10

Abstract

We calculate the charge susceptibility and the linear and differential conductances of a double quantum dot coupled to two metallic reservoirs both at equilibrium and when the system is driven away from equilibrium. This work is motivated by recent progress in the realization of solid state spin qubits. The calculations are performed by using the Keldysh nonequilibrium Green function technique. In the noninteracting case, we give the analytical expression for the electrical current and deduce from there the linear conductance as a function of the gate voltages applied to the dots, leading to a characteristic charge stability diagram. We determine the charge susceptibility which also exhibits peaks as a function of gate voltages. We show how the study can be extended to the case of an interacting quantum dot.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Quantum and electron transport phenomena · Advancements in Semiconductor Devices and Circuit Design · Surface and Thin Film Phenomena

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Univ. Grenoble Alpes, CEA, INAC, PHELIQS 1 , F-38000 Grenoble, France

Aix Marseille Univ, Université de Toulon, CNRS, CPT UMR 7332 2 , 13288 Marseille, France

Funding

CEA Eurotalents Program · Nanoscience Transversal Program of the CEA

References (19)

Show source-provided references
1. Phys. Rev. A · 1998 · 57 · 12010.1103/physreva.57.120 ↗
2. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1995 · 74 · 470210.1103/physrevlett.74.4702 ↗
3. Science · 1998 · 282 · 93210.1126/science.282.5390.932 ↗
4. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1998 · 80 · 495110.1103/physrevlett.80.4951 ↗
5. Nature Nanotechnology · 2014 · 9 · 98610.1038/nnano.2014.211 ↗
6. Nature Communications · 2016 · 7 · 1357510.1038/ncomms13575 ↗
7. Nature Nanotechnology · 2014 · 9 · 98110.1038/nnano.2014.216 ↗
8. Phys. Rev. B · 1996 · 54 · 563710.1103/physrevb.54.5637 ↗
9. Rev. Mod. Phys. · 2002 · 75 · 110.1103/revmodphys.75.1 ↗
10. Phys. Rev. B · 2001 · 63 · 16531310.1103/physrevb.63.165313 ↗
11. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2002 · 89 · 13680210.1103/physrevlett.89.136802 ↗
12. Phys. Rev. B · 2004 · 69 · 24532710.1103/physrevb.69.245327 ↗
13. Phys. Rev. B · 2006 · 74 · 03532610.1103/physrevb.74.035326 ↗
14. Phys. Rev. B · 2010 · 82 · 20530810.1103/physrevb.82.205308 ↗
15. Phys. Rev. B · 2011 · 83 · 12131110.1103/physrevb.83.121311 ↗
16. Phys. Rev. B · 2016 · 93 · 23544910.1103/physrevb.93.235449 ↗
17. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2018 · 120 · 10770210.1103/physrevlett.120.107702 ↗
18. Nano Letters · 2017 · 17 · 100110.1021/acs.nanolett.6b04354 ↗
19. 2008