journal article·2018-02-01Open access

Tuning perpendicular exchange bias in IrMn/[Co/Pt] and IrMn/CoFe/Co/[Pt/Co] systems with ultra thin Pt layers

Qin Ying, Liu Yifan

AIP Advances· Volume 8· Issue 2

Abstract

As-deposited IrMn/[Co/Pt] systems with ultra thin Pt layers (∼5.0 Å) have no perpendicular exchange bias and exhibit in-plane anisotropy. After perpendicular field-annealing, the perpendicular exchange bias is established and can be tuned by the Co thickness. It is found that the perpendicular exchange bias of IrMn/[Co/Pt] systems with ultra thin Pt layers appreciably surpasses that of the ever reported counterparts which contains relatively thick Pt layers. Perpendicular field-annealing also promotes a perpendicular orientation of magnetization, and a well-defined perpendicular anisotropy is obtained for an intermediate Co thickness. By replacing Co layer adjacent to IrMn with Co60Fe40/Co bilayer, the perpendicular exchange bias is drastically enhanced, and extremely tiny Co60Fe40 can yield a perpendicular exchange bias far superior to that of previously reported IrMn/Co60Fe40/[Pt/Co] system with Co60Fe40 layer of 6.0 Å.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Magnetic properties of thin films · Magnetic Properties and Applications · Advanced Memory and Neural Computing

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

School of Physical Science and Technology, Inner Mongolia University , Inner Mongolia, Hohhot 010021, People’s Republic of China

References (25)

Show source-provided references
1. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. · 1999 · 192 · 20310.1016/s0304-8853(98)00266-2 ↗
2. Chinese Physics B · 2014 · 23 · 2750310.1088/1674-1056/23/2/027503 ↗
3. Phys. Rev. B · 1991 · 43 · R129710.1103/PhysRevB.43.1297 ↗
4. J. Appl. Phys. · 1999 · 85 · 582810.1063/1.369932 ↗
5. Sci. Rep. · 2014 · 4 · 610910.1038/srep06109 ↗
6. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2001 · 87 · 08720210.1103/physrevlett.87.087202 ↗
7. J. Appl. Phys. · 2003 · 94 · 110510.1063/1.1582378 ↗
8. J. Appl. Phys. · 2002 · 91 · 690510.1063/1.1447870 ↗
9. Phys. Rev. B · 2005 · 71 · 05441110.1103/physrevb.71.054411 ↗
10. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2013 · 103 · 04240110.1063/1.4816336 ↗
11. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. · 2015 · 394 · 34910.1016/j.jmmm.2015.07.006 ↗
12. J. App. Phys. · 1989 · 66 · 490910.1063/1.343760 ↗
13. Rep. Prog. Phys. · 1996 · 59 · 140910.1088/0034-4885/59/11/002 ↗
14. J. Phys D: App. Phys. · 2009 · 42 · 11500210.1088/0022-3727/42/11/115002 ↗
15. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2003 · 83 · 353710.1063/1.1619562 ↗
16. J. Appl. Phys. · 2005 · 97 · 10K11410.1063/1.1855699 ↗
17. J. Appl. Phys. · 2003 · 93 · 839710.1063/1.1558096 ↗
18. J. Appl. Phys. · 2005 · 97 · 06390710.1063/1.1861964 ↗
19. J. Appl. Phys. · 2006 · 99 · 08390110.1063/1.2180527 ↗
20. J. App. Phys. · 2003 · 93 · 684110.1063/1.1544447 ↗
21. App. Phys. Lett. · 2005 · 87 · 24250410.1063/1.2139840 ↗
22. Phys. Rev. B · 2011 · 83 · 10441710.1103/physrevb.83.104417 ↗
23. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. · 2002 · 239 · 18210.1016/s0304-8853(01)00519-4 ↗
24. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. · 2006 · 39 · 73010.1088/0022-3727/39/4/019 ↗
25. J. Appl. Phys. · 1991 · 69 · 564910.1063/1.347924 ↗