Multiple intersection properties of optical resonance modes in metallic metamaterials
Source abstract
Abstract
Unusual behavior of Fabry-Perot-like waveguide resonance modes is presented for a quasi-dielectric metamaterial that consists of two metallic sub-wavelength cut-through slit-array slabs separated by an air-gap region. Simulations based on the finite-difference time-domain method were conducted. The unique optical properties were interpreted in terms of multiple intersection of the resonance modes. Depending on the intersection conditions of the optical modes, furthermore, a variety of crossing characteristics, i.e., fade-out crossing with/without an isolated loop, anticrossing with/without intensity reduction, and anticrossing with/without frequency repulsion, were identified for the air-gap dependence of the transmission spectra. These findings, which were obtained by careful observation of the properties of this type of metamaterial, present a novel and interesting aspect of the behavior of the optical resonance modes.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Plasmonic and Surface Plasmon Research · Metamaterials and Metasurfaces Applications · Advanced Antenna and Metasurface Technologies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Okayama Prefectural University 1 Faculty of Computer Science and System Engineering, , Soja, Okayama 719-1197, Japan
Osaka University 2 Institute of Laser Engineering, , Suita, Osaka 565-0871, Japan
Funding
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
References (22)
Show source-provided references
1. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1999 · 83 · 284510.1103/physrevlett.83.2845 ↗
2. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2005 · 95 · 21740210.1103/physrevlett.95.217402 ↗
3. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2006 · 88 · 07111410.1063/1.2174104 ↗
4. Phys. Rev. B · 2007 · 76 · 05430310.1103/physrevb.76.054303 ↗
5. Phys. Rev. B · 2009 · 80 · 15341010.1103/physrevb.80.153410 ↗
6. Opt. Express · 2011 · 19 · 218710.1364/oe.19.002187 ↗
7. Nature · 1998 · 391 · 66710.1038/35570 ↗
8. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2005 · 94 · 19740110.1103/physrevlett.94.197401 ↗
9. Opt. Lett. · 2006 · 31 · 51610.1364/ol.31.000516 ↗
10. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2007 · 91 · 11111110.1063/1.2784175 ↗
11. Phys. Rev. B · 2008 · 78 · 07540610.1103/physrevb.78.075406 ↗
12. Opt. Commun. · 2010 · 283 · 401710.1016/j.optcom.2010.06.031 ↗
13. Opt. Express · 2010 · 18 · 1787610.1364/oe.18.017876 ↗
14. Opt. Commun. · 2011 · 284 · 47110.1016/j.optcom.2010.08.023 ↗
15. J. Mod. Opt. · 2012 · 59 · 134210.1080/09500340.2012.714803 ↗
16. Appl. Phys. Express · 2012 · 5 · 04250210.1143/apex.5.042502 ↗
17. AIP Advances · 2012 · 2 · 04211210.1063/1.4759130 ↗
18. Appl. Phys. Express · 2013 · 6 · 06260210.7567/apex.6.062602 ↗
19. J. Appl. Phys. · 2013 · 113 · 24310310.1063/1.4812384 ↗
20. J. Appl. Phys. · 2014 · 115 · 24310410.1063/1.4885759 ↗
21. Appl. Phys. Express · 2016 · 9 · 03220110.7567/apex.9.032201 ↗
22. Phys. Rev. B · 1991 · 43 · 717010.1103/physrevb.43.7170 ↗