journal article·2022-09-01Open access

The computational simulation of the reflection spectra of copper red glaze

Gen Li, Yong Lei

AIP Advances· Volume 12· Issue 9

Abstract

Owing to the limitation of traditional analytical methods, the coloration mechanism of copper red glaze has been disputed in the academic field for a long time, which mainly focuses on whether the color agent is metallic copper nanoparticles or cuprous oxide (Cu2O) nanoparticles. Based on Mie scattering theory, this work calculated the reflection spectra of nanoparticles uniformly dispersed in transparent glaze with different types, diameters, and volume fractions, then discussed the differences between the reflection spectra of metallic copper and cuprous oxide as scatterers, calculated the corresponding L*a*b* values, and compared them with the experimental results. This work provides a feasible and convenient method to distinguish these two coloration mechanisms.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Pigment Synthesis and Properties · Cultural Heritage Materials Analysis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Conservation Science and Technology, The Palace Museum , Beijing 100009, People’s Republic of China

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China

References (28)

Show source-provided references
1. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. · 2021 · 41 · 380910.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2021.01.018 ↗
2. Nucl. Tech. · 2009 · 32 · 413
3. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. · 2022 · 42 · 114110.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2021.11.002 ↗
4. Ceramics · 2000 · 2000 · 23
5. J. Ceram. Soc. Jpn. · 1986 · 94 · 38710.2109/jcersj1950.94.1088_387 ↗
6. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. · 2018 · 38 · 429010.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2018.05.010 ↗
7. Appl. Phys. A · 2013 · 111 · 12110.1007/s00339-012-7445-x ↗
8. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. · 2014 · 34 · 256310.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2014.03.010 ↗
9. J. Cult. Heritage · 2021 · 48 · 2910.1016/j.culher.2021.01.008 ↗
10. Ceram. Int. · 2020 · 46 · 2318610.1016/j.ceramint.2020.06.099 ↗
11. Nucl. Sci. Tech. · 2019 · 30 · 11410.1007/s41365-019-0630-2 ↗
12. J. Synchrotron Radiat. · 2017 · 24 · 100010.1107/s1600577517010207 ↗
13. J. Univ. Chin. Acad. Sci. · 2016 · 33 · 421
14. Ceram. Int. · 2016 · 42 · 849510.1016/j.ceramint.2016.02.072 ↗
15. J. Synchrotron Radiat. · 2014 · 21 · 75110.1107/s1600577514009382 ↗
16. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. · 1999 · 82 · 68910.1111/j.1151-2916.1999.tb01818.x ↗
17. J. Appl. Phys. · 2012 · 112 · 05430710.1063/1.4749790 ↗
18. Appl. Phys. A · 2011 · 106 · 91510.1007/s00339-011-6707-3 ↗
19. 1983
20. 2002
21. Appl. Opt. · 1984 · 23 · 335310.1364/ao.23.003353 ↗
22. Appl. Opt. · 1986 · 25 · 112210.1364/ao.25.001122 ↗
23. Ceram. Int. · 2016 · 42 · 1534910.1016/j.ceramint.2016.06.179 ↗
24. Phys. Rev. B · 1972 · 6 · 437010.1103/physrevb.6.4370 ↗
25. China Ceram. Ind. · 2002 · 9 · 4
26. 1998
27. 2013
28. J. Ceram. · 2013 · 34 · 476