journal article·2021-08-01Open access

Fano resonances for high performance sensing in an asymmetric resonator based on hybrid graphene/dielectric metasurfaces

Shuhua Cao, Qi Wang, Xufeng Gao, Shijie Zhang, Ruijin Hong, Dawei Zhang

AIP Advances· Volume 11· Issue 8

Abstract

Improving the performance and sensitivity of metallic sensors is challenging because of the Ohmic loss that occurs for traditional metallic materials. In this work, we optimized a refractive index sensor consisting of graphene and a periodic array of asymmetric Si nanorod units. The sensor was formed by etching an asymmetric pair of nanorods and introducing gaps in the dielectric resonant nanostructures. This confined a large portion of electromagnetic energy into nanoscale hot spots within the gaps. The sensitivity of the sensor increased from 430 to 595 nm/RIU, and the figure of merit increased nearly fivefold from 956 to 4577 RIU−1. The results prove that the gapped dielectric metasurface served as an ideal platform for enhancing the interaction between light and the surrounding medium, making it a promising candidate for high-performance optical sensors.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Plasmonic and Surface Plasmon Research · Metamaterials and Metasurfaces Applications · Photonic Crystals and Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Shanghai Key Laboratory of Modern Optical System, Engineering Research Centre of Optical Instrument and System, The Ministry of Education, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology , Shanghai 200093, China

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China

References (39)

Show source-provided references
1. Opt. Lett. · 2020 · 45 · 250210.1364/ol.392540 ↗
2. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2016 · 108 · 08110910.1063/1.4942644 ↗
3. Opt. Express · 2018 · 26 · 1017910.1364/oe.26.010179 ↗
4. ACS Photonics · 2019 · 6 · 50110.1021/acsphotonics.8b01470 ↗
5. Phys. Rev. Appl. · 2020 · 14 · 04400910.1103/physrevapplied.14.044009 ↗
6. ACS Photonics · 2018 · 5 · 407410.1021/acsphotonics.8b00754 ↗
7. Opt. Express · 2020 · 28 · 2267910.1364/oe.400281 ↗
8. ACS Photonics · 2020 · 7 · 143610.1021/acsphotonics.0c00003 ↗
9. Appl. Phys. Express · 2020 · 13 · 02201310.35848/1882-0786/ab6f26 ↗
10. IEEE Sens. J. · 2015 · 15 · 631310.1109/jsen.2015.2455534 ↗
11. IEEE Sens. J. · 2019 · 19 · 257010.1109/jsen.2018.2886786 ↗
12. Appl. Phys. A · 2012 · 107 · 13310.1007/s00339-012-6757-1 ↗
13. Nano Lett. · 2010 · 10 · 110310.1021/nl902621d ↗
14. Nano Lett. · 2009 · 9 · 166310.1021/nl9001876 ↗
15. Nano Lett. · 2010 · 10 · 468010.1021/nl1029732 ↗
16. Nat. Mater. · 2010 · 9 · 70710.1038/nmat2810 ↗
17. Opt. Express · 2013 · 21 · 324310.1364/oe.21.003243 ↗
18. Adv. Opt. Mater. · 2013 · 1 · 6110.1002/adom.201200025 ↗
19. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2012 · 100 · 03110610.1063/1.3678184 ↗
20. Nano Lett. · 2013 · 13 · 347010.1021/nl4006194 ↗
21. Opt. Mater. Express · 2014 · 4 · 177510.1364/ome.4.001775 ↗
22. Sci. Rep. · 2014 · 4 · 446310.1038/srep04463 ↗
23. Opt. Mater. · 2019 · 88 · 5410.1016/j.optmat.2018.11.017 ↗
24. Carbon · 2020 · 157 · 57810.1016/j.carbon.2019.10.040 ↗
25. New J. Phys. · 2020 · 22 · 05303910.1088/1367-2630/ab83d5 ↗
26. Opt. Express · 2020 · 28 · 1193310.1364/oe.388298 ↗
27. Opt. Express · 2020 · 28 · 3494810.1364/oe.408632 ↗
28. 1985
29. AIP Adv. · 2016 · 6 · 08530110.1063/1.4960465 ↗
30. AIP Adv. · 2020 · 10 · 12511310.1063/5.0029886 ↗
31. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. · 2021 · 27 · 830020610.1109/jstqe.2020.2991884 ↗
32. Opt. Lett. · 2018 · 43 · 184210.1364/ol.43.001842 ↗
33. Rev. Sci. Instrum. · 2018 · 89 · 10390210.1063/1.5048316 ↗
34. Phys. Rev. B · 2003 · 67 · 09411210.1103/physrevb.67.094112 ↗
35. Nat. Commun. · 2014 · 5 · 575310.1038/ncomms6753 ↗
36. Appl. Sci. · 2018 · 8 · 179910.3390/app8101799 ↗
37. Plasmonics · 2018 · 13 · 1510.1007/s11468-016-0478-9 ↗
38. Opt. Express · 2019 · 27 · 1325210.1364/oe.27.013252 ↗
39. Opt. Express · 2014 · 22 · 3088910.1364/OE.22.030889 ↗