Fano resonances for high performance sensing in an asymmetric resonator based on hybrid graphene/dielectric metasurfaces
Source abstract
Abstract
Improving the performance and sensitivity of metallic sensors is challenging because of the Ohmic loss that occurs for traditional metallic materials. In this work, we optimized a refractive index sensor consisting of graphene and a periodic array of asymmetric Si nanorod units. The sensor was formed by etching an asymmetric pair of nanorods and introducing gaps in the dielectric resonant nanostructures. This confined a large portion of electromagnetic energy into nanoscale hot spots within the gaps. The sensitivity of the sensor increased from 430 to 595 nm/RIU, and the figure of merit increased nearly fivefold from 956 to 4577 RIU−1. The results prove that the gapped dielectric metasurface served as an ideal platform for enhancing the interaction between light and the surrounding medium, making it a promising candidate for high-performance optical sensors.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Plasmonic and Surface Plasmon Research · Metamaterials and Metasurfaces Applications · Photonic Crystals and Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Shanghai Key Laboratory of Modern Optical System, Engineering Research Centre of Optical Instrument and System, The Ministry of Education, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology , Shanghai 200093, China
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China
References (39)
Show source-provided references
1. Opt. Lett. · 2020 · 45 · 250210.1364/ol.392540 ↗
2. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2016 · 108 · 08110910.1063/1.4942644 ↗
3. Opt. Express · 2018 · 26 · 1017910.1364/oe.26.010179 ↗
4. ACS Photonics · 2019 · 6 · 50110.1021/acsphotonics.8b01470 ↗
5. Phys. Rev. Appl. · 2020 · 14 · 04400910.1103/physrevapplied.14.044009 ↗
6. ACS Photonics · 2018 · 5 · 407410.1021/acsphotonics.8b00754 ↗
7. Opt. Express · 2020 · 28 · 2267910.1364/oe.400281 ↗
8. ACS Photonics · 2020 · 7 · 143610.1021/acsphotonics.0c00003 ↗
9. Appl. Phys. Express · 2020 · 13 · 02201310.35848/1882-0786/ab6f26 ↗
10. IEEE Sens. J. · 2015 · 15 · 631310.1109/jsen.2015.2455534 ↗
11. IEEE Sens. J. · 2019 · 19 · 257010.1109/jsen.2018.2886786 ↗
12. Appl. Phys. A · 2012 · 107 · 13310.1007/s00339-012-6757-1 ↗
13. Nano Lett. · 2010 · 10 · 110310.1021/nl902621d ↗
14. Nano Lett. · 2009 · 9 · 166310.1021/nl9001876 ↗
15. Nano Lett. · 2010 · 10 · 468010.1021/nl1029732 ↗
16. Nat. Mater. · 2010 · 9 · 70710.1038/nmat2810 ↗
17. Opt. Express · 2013 · 21 · 324310.1364/oe.21.003243 ↗
18. Adv. Opt. Mater. · 2013 · 1 · 6110.1002/adom.201200025 ↗
19. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2012 · 100 · 03110610.1063/1.3678184 ↗
20. Nano Lett. · 2013 · 13 · 347010.1021/nl4006194 ↗
21. Opt. Mater. Express · 2014 · 4 · 177510.1364/ome.4.001775 ↗
22. Sci. Rep. · 2014 · 4 · 446310.1038/srep04463 ↗
23. Opt. Mater. · 2019 · 88 · 5410.1016/j.optmat.2018.11.017 ↗
24. Carbon · 2020 · 157 · 57810.1016/j.carbon.2019.10.040 ↗
25. New J. Phys. · 2020 · 22 · 05303910.1088/1367-2630/ab83d5 ↗
26. Opt. Express · 2020 · 28 · 1193310.1364/oe.388298 ↗
27. Opt. Express · 2020 · 28 · 3494810.1364/oe.408632 ↗
28. 1985
29. AIP Adv. · 2016 · 6 · 08530110.1063/1.4960465 ↗
30. AIP Adv. · 2020 · 10 · 12511310.1063/5.0029886 ↗
31. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. · 2021 · 27 · 830020610.1109/jstqe.2020.2991884 ↗
32. Opt. Lett. · 2018 · 43 · 184210.1364/ol.43.001842 ↗
33. Rev. Sci. Instrum. · 2018 · 89 · 10390210.1063/1.5048316 ↗
34. Phys. Rev. B · 2003 · 67 · 09411210.1103/physrevb.67.094112 ↗
35. Nat. Commun. · 2014 · 5 · 575310.1038/ncomms6753 ↗
36. Appl. Sci. · 2018 · 8 · 179910.3390/app8101799 ↗
37. Plasmonics · 2018 · 13 · 1510.1007/s11468-016-0478-9 ↗
38. Opt. Express · 2019 · 27 · 1325210.1364/oe.27.013252 ↗
39. Opt. Express · 2014 · 22 · 3088910.1364/OE.22.030889 ↗