A three-step model for optimizing coil spacings inside cuboid-shaped magnetic shields
Source abstract
Abstract
A three-step model for calculating the magnetic field generated by coils inside cuboid-shaped shields like magnetically shielded rooms (MSRs) is presented. The shield is modeled as two parallel plates of infinite width and one tube of infinite height. We propose an improved mirror method that considers the effect of the parallel plates of finite thickness. A reaction factor is introduced to describe the influence of the vertical tube, which is obtained from finite element method (FEM) simulations. By applying the improved mirror method and then multiplying the result with the reaction factor, the magnetic flux density within the shielded volume can be determined in a fast computation. The three-step model is verified with both FEM and measurements of the field of a Helmholtz coil inside an MSR with a superconducting quantum interference device. The model allows a fast optimization of shield-coupled coil spacings compared to repetitive, time-consuming FEM calculations. As an example, we optimize the distance between two parallel square coils attached to the MSR walls. Measurements of a coil prototype of 2.75 m side length show a magnetic field change of 18 pT over the central 5 cm at the field strength of 2.7 µT. This obtained relative field change of 6 ppm is a factor of 5.4 smaller than our previously used Helmholtz coil.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Atomic and Subatomic Physics Research · Quantum, superfluid, helium dynamics · Superconducting Materials and Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt Berlin 1 , 10587 Berlin, Germany
Department of Electrical Engineering and Automation, Harbin Institute of Technology 2 , 150001 Harbin, China
Laboratory for Space Environment and Physical Sciences, Harbin Institute of Technology 3 , 150001 Harbin, China
Funding
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft · National Natural Science Foundation of China
References (43)
Show source-provided references
1. Hyperfine Interact. · 2015 · 230 · 14110.1007/s10751-014-1109-5 ↗
2. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A · 2017 · 862 · 3610.1016/j.nima.2017.05.005 ↗
3. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A · 2011 · 660 · 14710.1016/j.nima.2011.09.019 ↗
4. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A · 2018 · 890 · 5110.1016/j.nima.2018.01.026 ↗
5. IEEE Trans. Magn. · 2015 · 51 · 310.1109/tmag.2014.2357783 ↗
6. 1995 · 72
7. IEEE Access · 2019 · 7 · 7480010.1109/access.2019.2920955 ↗
8. Metrol. Meas. Syst. · 2013 · 20 · 23910.2478/mms-2013-0021 ↗
9. IEEE Trans. Magn. · 2009 · 45 · 464410.1109/tmag.2009.2025185 ↗
10. J. Magn. Reson. · 2011 · 211 · 8910.1016/j.jmr.2011.04.008 ↗
11. Phys. Rev. A · 1988 · 37 · 287710.1103/physreva.37.2877 ↗
12. Eur. Phys. J. D · 2017 · 71 · 9810.1140/epjd/e2017-70505-4 ↗
13. Eur. Phys. J. D · 2015 · 69 · 22510.1140/epjd/e2015-60207-4 ↗
14. Phys. Rev. A · 2012 · 85 · 04210510.1103/physreva.85.042105 ↗
15. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2020 · 124 · 08180310.1103/PhysRevLett.124.081803 ↗
16. Phys. Rev. A · 2019 · 99 · 04211210.1103/PhysRevA.99.042112 ↗
17. J. R. Dadisman, “Magnetic field design to reduce systematic effects in neutron electric dipole moment measurements,” Ph.D. thesis and dissertations, Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Kentucky, 2018.
18. Rev. Sci. Instrum. · 1991 · 62 · 247210.1063/1.1142267 ↗
19. AIP Adv. · 2017 · 7 · 03521610.1063/1.4978394 ↗
20. Rev. Sci. Instrum. · 2014 · 85 · 07510610.1063/1.4886146 ↗
21. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A · 2020 · 949 · 16283710.1016/j.nima.2019.162837 ↗
22. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A · 2013 · 723 · 3010.1016/j.nima.2013.05.013 ↗
23. IEEE Access · 2019 · 7 · 12531010.1109/access.2019.2933608 ↗
24. M. Packer, P. J. Hobson, N. Holmes, J. Leggett, P. Glover, M. J. Brookes, R. Bowtell, and T. M. Fromhold, http://arXiv:2006.02981 (2020).
25. Rev. Sci. Instrum. · 1965 · 36 · 17910.1063/1.1719514 ↗
26. IEEE Magn. Lett. · 2014 · 5 · 110.1109/lmag.2014.2330346 ↗
27. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. · 2020 · 507 · 16684610.1016/j.jmmm.2020.166846 ↗
28. 2013 · 243
29. 2018 · 1
30. IRE Trans. Ind. Electron. · 2020 · 67 · 134810.1109/tie.2019.2899544 ↗
31. IEEE Trans. Power Electron. · 2013 · 28 · 141310.1109/tpel.2012.2206404 ↗
32. 2001 · 970
33. Rev. Sci. Instrum. · 2015 · 86 · 05470110.1063/1.4919400 ↗
34. Rev. Sci. Instrum. · 2013 · 84 · 07510910.1063/1.4813275 ↗
35. Electromagnetic shielding
36. 1998 · 182
37. Phys. Plasmas · 2002 · 9 · 441010.1063/1.1507589 ↗
38. W. Frei, “Exploiting symmetry to simplify magnetic field modeling,” available at https://www.comsol.com/blogs/exploiting-symmetry-simplify-magnetic-field-modeling/; accessed on 2 March 2020.
39. Rev. Sci. Instrum. · 1966 · 37 · 126410.1063/1.1720478 ↗
40. Magnicon GmbH, “CSE-1 low-noise current source,” available at http://www.magnicon.com/squid-electronics/accessories/cse-1/; accessed on 2 January 2020.
41. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A · 2017 · 867 · 13910.1016/j.nima.2017.05.050 ↗
42. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2019 · 123 · 14300310.1103/PhysRevLett.123.143003 ↗
43. Rev. Sci. Instrum. · 2007 · 78 · 03510610.1063/1.2713433 ↗