New neuro-fuzzy system-based holey polymer fibers drawing process
Source abstract
Abstract
Furnace temperature (T), draw tension (TE), and draw ratio (Dr) are the main parameters that could directly affect holey polymer fiber (HPF) production during the drawing stage. Therefore, a suitable mechanism to control (T), (TE), and (Dr) is required to enhance the HPF production process. The conventional approaches, such as observation and tuning technique, experience many difficulties in realizing the accurate values of (T), (TE), and (Dr) in addition to being expensive and time consuming. Therefore, an artificial intelligence model using the adaptive neuro-fuzzy system (ANFIS) method is proposed as an effective solution to achieve an accurate value of the main parameters that affect HPF drawing. Three ANFIS models are developed and tested to determine which one has the best performance for emulating the operation of HPF drawing tower. The ANFIS model with a gbell MF provides a better performance than Gaussian MF ANFIS model and triangular MF ANFIS model in terms of lower mean absolute error and mean square error. Furthermore, the proposed gbell MF model achieved the highest Q–Q response, which indicates the excellent performance of this model.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Fiber Optic Sensors · Photonic Crystal and Fiber Optics · Textile materials and evaluations
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Computer Engineering Techniques, Electrical Engineering Technical College, Middle Technical University , Baghdad, Iraq. Baghdad, Al Doura 10022, Iraq
References (42)
Show source-provided references
1. Opt. Lett. · 1996 · 21 · 154710.1364/ol.21.001547 ↗
2. 2007
3. 2008
4. AIP Adv. · 2016 · 6 · 5592010.1063/1.4943925 ↗
5. Opt. Mater. Express · 2016 · 6 · 64910.1364/ome.6.000649 ↗
6. 2002
7. Opt. Lett. · 2007 · 32 · 46010.1364/ol.32.000460 ↗
8. Opt. Mater. Express · 2017 · 7 · 28610.1364/ome.7.000286 ↗
9. Opt. Express · 2011 · 19 · 1973110.1364/oe.19.019731 ↗
10. Opt. Lett. · 1997 · 22 · 96110.1364/ol.22.000961 ↗
11. Opt. Express · 2009 · 17 · 859210.1364/oe.17.008592 ↗
12. Sensors (Switzerland) · 2013 · 13 · 324210.3390/s130303242 ↗
13. AIP Adv. · 2016 · 6 · 6510710.1063/1.4953810 ↗
14. Opt. Express · 2005 · 13 · 588310.1364/opex.13.005883 ↗
15. IEEE Sens. J. · 2016 · 16 · 8483
16. IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett. · 2012 · 24 · 76310.1109/lpt.2012.2188024 ↗
17. J. Light. Technol. · 2016 · 34 · 219810.1109/jlt.2015.2511022 ↗
18. Opt. Express · 2001 · 9 · 31910.1364/oe.9.000319 ↗
19. J. Light. Technol. · 2009 · 27 · 157110.1109/jlt.2009.2020609 ↗
20. Opt. Express · 2013 · 21 · 475810.1364/oe.21.004758 ↗
21. Opt. Commun. · 2012 · 285 · 182510.1016/j.optcom.2011.12.033 ↗
22. AIP Adv. · 2017 · 7 · 3510610.1063/1.4978393 ↗
23. Optoelectron. Adv. Mater. – RAPID Commun. · 2011 · 5 · 1026
24. Energies · 2016 · 9 · 12010.3390/en9030120 ↗
25. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. · 2016 · 91 · 172810.1002/jctb.4761 ↗
26. Measurement · 2015 · 75 · 33810.1016/j.measurement.2015.07.020 ↗
27. Measurement · 2015 · 74 · 7810.1016/j.measurement.2015.06.019 ↗
28. 2014 · 890
29. IEEE Sens. J. · 2014 · 14 · 357910.1109/jsen.2014.2329333 ↗
30. INFRARED Phys. Technol. · 2014 · 65 · 5410.1016/j.infrared.2014.03.011 ↗
31. 2013 · 204
32. Optoelectron. Adv. Mater. Rapid Commun. · 2013 · 7 · 470
33. Adv. Electr. Comput. Eng. · 2017 · 17 · 1510.4316/aece.2017.01003 ↗
34. Opt. Fiber Technol. · 2004 · 10 · 32510.1016/j.yofte.2004.05.003 ↗
35. Int. J. Comput. Appl. · 2015 · 123 · 3210.5120/ijca2015905635 ↗
36. Proc. IEEE · 1995 · 83 · 37810.1109/5.364486 ↗
37. Int. J. Eng. Sci. · 2016 · 5 · 1
38. J. Light. Technol. · 2005 · 23 · 225510.1109/jlt.2005.850058 ↗
39. Polymer (Guildf) · 2011 · 52 · 165410.1016/j.polymer.2011.01.059 ↗
40. IEEE Photonics J. · 2010 · 2 · 62010.1109/jphot.2010.2052454 ↗
41. Int. J. Comput. Sci. Commun. Networks · 2017 · 7 · 1
42. Prog. Electromagn. Res. B · 2008 · 6 · 22510.2528/pierb08031223 ↗