journal article·2017-06Open access

Acoustic model order reduction for the lowest condition number in inverse method

Reza Madoliat, Nowrouz Mohammad Nouri, Ali Rahrovi

AIP Advances· Volume 7· Issue 6

Abstract

Acoustic sources with wide surfaces can be broken down in a fluid environment into smaller acoustic sources. In this study, a general model is presented, indicating the type, number, direction, position and strength of these sources in such a way that the main sound and the sound of the equivalent sources match each other acceptably. When the position and direction of the source is determined, the strength of the source can be found using the inverse method. However, since the solution is not unique in the inverse method, a different acoustic strength is obtained for the sources if different positions are selected. By selecting an arrangement of general sources and using an optimization algorithm, the least possible mismatch between the main sound and the sound of equivalent sources can be achieved. In the inverse method, it is important to reduce the effects of measurement errors. The sensor placement and acoustic model order reduction (AMOR) are studied for reducing these effects.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Underwater Acoustics Research · Acoustic Wave Phenomena Research · Speech and Audio Processing

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (30)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.2514/3.287410.2514/3.2874 ↗
2. 10.2514/3.302710.2514/3.3027 ↗
3. 10.2514/3.1102610.2514/3.11026 ↗
4. 10.1016/0022-460x(92)90455-710.1016/0022-460x(92)90455-7 ↗
5. Qu Z.-Q. · Journal of Mechanical Strength · 1998 · 3 · 122
6. 10.1006/jsvi.1995.045110.1006/jsvi.1995.0451 ↗
7. 10.1006/jsvi.1997.154310.1006/jsvi.1997.1543 ↗
8. Qu Z.-Q. · 2004
9. Woerkom P. T. L. M. V. · 1986
10. 10.1115/1.311107510.1115/1.3111075 ↗
11. 10.2514/3.1338610.2514/3.13386 ↗
12. Yoon S. · 1998
13. Li X. D. · 1995
14. 10.2514/3.1319810.2514/3.13198 ↗
15. 10.1006/jsvi.2001.367110.1006/jsvi.2001.3671 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.apacoust.2014.03.00810.1016/j.apacoust.2014.03.008 ↗
17. E. V. Wijngaarden,Prediction of Propeller-Induced Hull-Pressure Fluctuations, in Marin 2011, Delft; Netherlands. p. 210.
18. 10.1016/j.jsv.2013.11.00210.1016/j.jsv.2013.11.002 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.jsv.2014.07.02510.1016/j.jsv.2014.07.025 ↗
20. S. W. Rienstra and A. Hirschberg,An Introduction to Acoustics, 2013, UK: Eindhoven University of Technology, 298 Pages.
21. Y. A. Iskander Akhatov and K. Attenborough.Springer Handbook of Acoustics. 2007, Stanford: Springer, 1182 Pages.
22. 10.1016/j.ymssp.2010.02.00910.1016/j.ymssp.2010.02.009 ↗
23. Chanaud R. C. · 2010
24. M. R. Bai, J.G. Ih, and J. Benesty,Acoustic Array Systems Theory, Implementation, and Application, edition first ed, 2013: John Wiley & Sons Singapore :195-206. 516.10.1002/9780470827253 ↗
25. 10.1121/1.40838710.1121/1.408387 ↗
26. C. Liu, Advanced Signal Processing Techniques for Underwater Acoustic Communication Networks, in Department of Electronics. 2011, University of York. 136.
27. 10.1016/j.apacoust.2016.06.03010.1016/j.apacoust.2016.06.030 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.jsv.2005.01.02310.1016/j.jsv.2005.01.023 ↗
29. 10.1016/0024-3795(92)90016-410.1016/0024-3795(92)90016-4 ↗
30. 10.1063/1.497718510.1063/1.4977185 ↗