Analysis on the anisotropic electromechanical properties of lead magnoniobate titanate single crystal for ring type ultrasonic motors
Source abstract
Abstract
This work discussed the optimized cut of single crystal lead magnoniobate titanate (PMNT) for use of ring type travelling wave ultrasonic motors (USMs), according to anisotropic analysis on electromechanical properties. The selection criterion of crystal orientation relies on the circular uniformity of the induced travelling wave amplitude on the stator surface. By calculating the equivalent elastic coefficient c11 and lateral piezoelectric constant d31, the optimal crystal orientations were proposed for PMNT single crystals poled along different directions. For single crystal poled along <001>c directions, the optimal orientation lies along [001]c with d31=-1335pC/N and k31=0.87. The crystallographic orientation [025]c is the optimized orientation for single crystals poled along <011>c direction with d31=199pC/N and k31=0.55. The optimal orientation of 1R configuration is [332¯]c with a large enhancement of d31 = 1201 and k31=0.92.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Piezoelectric Actuators and Control · Ferroelectric and Piezoelectric Materials · Advanced Materials and Mechanics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Xi’an Jiaotong University 1 Electronic Materials Research Laboratory, Key Laboratory of the Ministry of Education & International Center for Dielectric Research, , Xi’an 710049, People’s Republic of China
Chongqing University 2 The State Key Laboratory of Mechanical Transmissions, , 400030, People’s Republic of China
North Carolina State University 3 Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, , Raleigh, North Carolina 27695, USA
References (23)
Show source-provided references
1. AIP Conf. Proc · 2006 · 823 · 178310.1063/1.2202607 ↗
2. Appl. Phys. · 2014 · 115 · 14410310.1063/1.4870947 ↗
3. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2013 · 102 · 13410610.1063/1.4799353v ↗
4. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2013 · 102 · 04290610.1063/1.4790142 ↗
5. Sens. Actuators, A · 2013 · 189 · 50410.1016/j.sna.2012.11.009 ↗
6. J Electroceram · 2008 · 20 · 27710.1007/s10832-007-9193-4 ↗
7. Mater. Sci. Eng. B · 2014 · 185 · 13410.1016/j.mseb.2014.02.021 ↗
8. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2008 · 92 · 15350410.1063/1.2908963 ↗
9. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2005 · 86 · 05350110.1063/1.1855424 ↗
10. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. · 2012 · 51 · 07GE0910.7567/jjap.51.07ge09 ↗
11. Proceedings of the Indian Academy of Sciences- Section A · 1967 · 66 · 3310.1007/BF03049406 ↗
12. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2011 · 99 · 16290110.1063/1.3652703 ↗
13. 1987
14. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2003 · 82 · 373710.1063/1.1576510 ↗
15. J. Appl. Phys. · 2011 · 110 · 06410610.1063/1.3638691 ↗
16. Prog. Mater. Sci. · 2015 · 68 · 110.1016/j.pmatsci.2014.10.002 ↗
17. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2013 · 102 · 18351210.1063/1.4804627 ↗
18. 2005
19. Opt. Soc. Am. · 1925 · 11 · 23310.1364/JOSA.11.000233 ↗
20. 1985
21. Phys. Rev. B. · 2015 · 91 · 18410510.1103/PhysRevB.91.184105 ↗
22. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2004 · 85 · 638010.1063/1.1842365 ↗
23. 2007